| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering and Technology | 42 | 6411 | 6185 | 1203 | 1197 | 82 | 9535 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Richard C.M. Yam between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard C.M. Yam published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2001. 1 of the 91 publications appeared in the last two years.
91 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1996 | 3 |
| 1997 | 1 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 8 |
| 2001 | 9 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 8 |
| 2004 | 2 |
| 2005 | 5 |
| 2006 | 3 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2010 | 9 |
| 2011 | 3 |
| 2012 | 5 |
| 2013 | 3 |
| 2014 | 2 |
| 2015 | 2 |
| 2016 | 3 |
| 2017 | 5 |
| 2018 | 1 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| Total | 91 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C.M. Yam sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 82 publications — 4th percentile
4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 20 | |
| 48–57 | 35 | |
| 58–67 | 96 | |
| 68–77 | 135 | |
| 78–87 | 190 | 82 |
| 88–97 | 259 | |
| 98–107 | 283 | |
| 108–117 | 369 | |
| 118–127 | 341 | |
| 128–137 | 386 | |
| 138–147 | 372 | |
| 148–157 | 457 | |
| 158–167 | 415 | |
| 168–177 | 407 | |
| 178–187 | 421 | |
| 188–197 | 378 | |
| 198–207 | 403 | |
| 208–217 | 317 | |
| 218–227 | 346 | |
| 228–237 | 321 | |
| 238–247 | 260 | |
| 248–257 | 280 | |
| 258–267 | 240 | |
| 268–277 | 214 | |
| 278–287 | 242 | |
| 288–297 | 203 | |
| 298–307 | 166 | |
| 308–317 | 154 | |
| 318–327 | 175 | |
| 328–337 | 159 | |
| 338–347 | 99 | |
| 348–357 | 131 | |
| 358–367 | 106 | |
| 368–377 | 118 | |
| 378–387 | 97 | |
| 388–397 | 108 | |
| 398–407 | 82 | |
| 408–417 | 71 | |
| 418–427 | 64 | |
| 428–437 | 55 | |
| 438–447 | 54 | |
| 448–457 | 60 | |
| 458–467 | 47 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 30 | |
| 488–497 | 29 | |
| 498–507 | 38 | |
| 508–517 | 40 | |
| 518–527 | 32 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 28 | |
| 548–557 | 23 | |
| 558–567 | 19 | |
| 568–577 | 16 | |
| 578–587 | 17 | |
| 588–597 | 18 | |
| 598–607 | 22 | |
| 608–617 | 15 | |
| 618–627 | 9 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 21 | |
| 648–657 | 12 | |
| 658–667 | 9 | |
| 668–677 | 11 | |
| 678–687 | 9 | |
| 688–697 | 6 | |
| 698–707 | 14 | |
| 708–717 | 7 | |
| 718–727 | 8 | |
| 728–737 | 10 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 5 | |
| 758–767 | 5 | |
| 768–777 | 11 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 2 | |
| 798–803 | 4 | |
| 804+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C.M. Yam sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile
35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 59 | |
| 31 | 114 | |
| 32 | 129 | |
| 33 | 189 | |
| 34 | 200 | |
| 35 | 262 | |
| 36 | 311 | |
| 37 | 312 | |
| 38 | 350 | |
| 39 | 385 | |
| 40 | 348 | |
| 41 | 362 | |
| 42 | 426 | 42 |
| 43 | 380 | |
| 44 | 310 | |
| 45 | 341 | |
| 46 | 301 | |
| 47 | 306 | |
| 48 | 271 | |
| 49 | 246 | |
| 50 | 210 | |
| 51 | 253 | |
| 52 | 213 | |
| 53 | 221 | |
| 54 | 195 | |
| 55 | 186 | |
| 56 | 170 | |
| 57 | 167 | |
| 58 | 166 | |
| 59 | 144 | |
| 60 | 152 | |
| 61 | 141 | |
| 62 | 138 | |
| 63 | 131 | |
| 64 | 118 | |
| 65 | 114 | |
| 66 | 119 | |
| 67 | 95 | |
| 68 | 87 | |
| 69 | 77 | |
| 70 | 89 | |
| 71 | 69 | |
| 72 | 54 | |
| 73 | 46 | |
| 74 | 55 | |
| 75 | 54 | |
| 76 | 49 | |
| 77 | 53 | |
| 78 | 46 | |
| 79 | 28 | |
| 80 | 39 | |
| 81 | 36 | |
| 82 | 24 | |
| 83 | 26 | |
| 84 | 36 | |
| 85 | 18 | |
| 86 | 25 | |
| 87 | 19 | |
| 88 | 26 | |
| 89 | 27 | |
| 90 | 23 | |
| 91 | 15 | |
| 92 | 12 | |
| 93 | 9 | |
| 94 | 15 | |
| 95 | 10 | |
| 96 | 13 | |
| 97 | 13 | |
| 98 | 9 | |
| 99 | 7 | |
| 100 | 7 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 7 | |
| 103 | 7 | |
| 104 | 9 | |
| 105 | 6 | |
| 106 | 9 | |
| 107+ | 99 |
Richard C.M. Yam is affiliated with the City University of Hong Kong in China. Their academic contributions involve collaboration with other researchers in their field, notably Daming Lin and Ming J. Zuo.
Their work is characterized by partnerships with these frequent co-authors:
Although specific recent papers, publication venues, and detailed research topics are not listed, they have maintained an active role in academic research at their institution. This suggests ongoing engagement in scholarly activities in their field.
No records indicate awards or distinctions at this time.
Richard C.M. Yam;Jian Cheng Guan;Kit Fai Pun;Esther P.Y. Tang
Richard C.M. Yam;William Lo;Esther P.Y. Tang;Antonio K.W. Lau
Jian Cheng Guan;Richard C.M. Yam;Chiu Kam Mok;Ning Ma
R. C. M. Yam;P.W. Tse;L. Li;P. Tu
Peter W. Tse;Y. H. Peng;Richard Yam
Jiye Liang;Kwai-Sang Chin;Chuangyin Dang;Richard C. M. Yam
Jian Cheng Guan;Jian Cheng Guan;Richard C.M. Yam
Jian Cheng Guan;Richard C.M. Yam;Esther P.Y. Tang;Antonio K.W. Lau
Jian Cheng Guan;Chiu Kam Mok;Richard C.M. Yam;K.S. Chin
Antonio K.W. Lau;Richard C.M. Yam;Esther P.Y. Tang
Daming Lin;Ming J. Zuo;Richard C. M. Yam
M.J. Zuo;Renyan Jiang;R.C.M. Yam
Jian Cheng Guan;Richard C. M. Yam;Chiu Kam Mok
Darning Lin;Ming J. Zuo;Richard C. M. Yam
Antonio K. W. Lau;Richard C. M. Yam;Esther Tang
JianCheng Guan;KaiRui Zuo;KaiHua Chen;Richard C.M. Yam
Qiang Zhao;Baoqing Zhang;Hui Quan;Richard C.M. Yam
Yiqiang Wang;Richard C. M. Yam;Ming Jian Zuo;Peter W. Tse
Qiang Zhao;Jian Tao;Richard C.M. Yam;Albert C.K. Mok
Zhigang Tian;Ming J. Zuo;Richard C.M. Yam
Qiang Zhao;Richard C. M. Yam;Baoqing Zhang;Yingkui Yang
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
The landscape of Engineering and Technology education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with a growing number of flexible, online study options available. Many institutions now offer programs tailored to fit diverse lifestyles, making it easier for non-traditional students to advance their careers. For example, online degrees for stay at home moms allow busy parents to balance family responsibilities with academic progress.
For those looking to accelerate their learning, 6 week courses and intensive online programs offer the opportunity to fast-track your education. In fields like finance, students can earn credentials quickly by enrolling in an accelerated finance degree online. Similarly, earning an accelerated MBA is a smart pathway for engineers aiming to move into management roles.
Exploring these flexible online degrees and accelerated study options can open doors to new career pathways in engineering, technology, and beyond.
Technical University of Berlin
Australian National University
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Spanish National Research Council
University of Barcelona
University of Manchester
PSL University
Kumamoto University
Eburon Resources LLC
Duke University
University of Copenhagen
Seoul National University
Shahid Beheshti University
University of Warwick
University of Missouri–St. Louis
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
