World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 106 6423 6043 3420 3172 616 51271

David D. Celentano publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David D. Celentano between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David D. Celentano published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2008. 4 of the 621 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2008. 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 21 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 19 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 39 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

621 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David D. Celentano: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 3
1979 1
1980 3
1981 1
1982 5
1983 3
1984 5
1985 2
1986 1
1987 4
1988 4
1989 10
1990 10
1991 21
1992 7
1993 6
1994 19
1995 15
1996 17
1997 9
1998 12
1999 11
2000 10
2001 22
2002 16
2003 26
2004 17
2005 17
2006 24
2007 27
2008 39
2009 19
2010 29
2011 34
2012 16
2013 16
2014 14
2015 17
2016 21
2017 10
2018 10
2019 13
2020 16
2021 21
2022 9
2023 5
2024 3
2025 1
Total 621
Download as CSV

David D. Celentano publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D. Celentano sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 616 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 616
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David D. Celentano D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D. Celentano sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 106
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David D. Celentano is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research falls predominantly within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. Additional areas of study include Sociology and Political Science, Virology, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's main research topics focus on HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions as well as the intersection of HIV, Drug Use, and Sexual Risk. Related areas include Sex work and related issues, HIV Research and Treatment, LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy, Hepatitis C virus research, and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health.

David D. Celentano has contributed research published in a variety of venues. Frequent publication sites include UNC Libraries, Journal of the International AIDS Society, Journal of Adolescent Health, PLoS ONE, and The Lancet HIV.

Recent selected papers include:

  • Role of Structural Marginalization, HIV Stigma, and Mistrust on HIV Prevention and Treatment Among Young Black Latinx Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women: Perspectives from Youth Service Providers (2020, AIDS Patient Care and STDs)
  • Depressive symptoms among Peruvian adult residents amidst a National Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021, BMC Psychiatry)
  • Randomized trial of two artificial intelligence coaching interventions to increase physical activity in cancer survivors (2021, npj Digital Medicine)
  • Mortality among people who inject drugs: a prospective cohort followed over three decades in Baltimore, MD, USA (2021, Addiction)
  • Awareness of and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India: Results from a multi-city cross-sectional survey (2021, PLoS ONE)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David D. Celentano include:

  • Shruti H. Mehta
  • Sunil S. Solomon
  • Aylur K. Srikrishnan
  • Allison M. McFall
  • Gregory M. Lucas

Best Publications

  • Prevention of HIV-1 Infection with Early Antiretroviral Therapy

    Myron S. Cohen;Ying Q. Chen;Marybeth McCauley;Theresa Gamble

  • Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors.

    Walter F. Stewart;Richard B. Lipton;David D. Celentano;Michael L. Reed

  • Antiretroviral Therapy for the Prevention of HIV-1 Transmission

    Myron S. Cohen;Ying Q. Chen;Marybeth McCauley;Theresa Gamble

  • HIV Prevalence and Associated Risks in Young Men Who Have Sex With Men

    Linda A. Valleroy;Duncan A. MacKellar;John M. Karon;Daniel H. Rosen

  • Association between Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance

    Ajay K. Sethi;David D. Celentano;Stephen J. Gange;Richard D. Moore;Richard D. Moore

  • Effects of early versus delayed initiation of antiretroviral treatment on clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infection: results from the phase 3 HPTN 052 randomised controlled trial

    Beatriz Grinsztejn;Mina C. Hosseinipour;Heather J. Ribaudo;Susan Swindells

  • The Social Epidemiology of Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

    K. E. Poundstone;Steffanie Strathdee;David D. Celentano

  • An epidemiologic study of headache among adolescents and young adults.

    Martha S. Linet;Walter F. Stewart;David D. Celentano;Dewey Ziegler

  • Age- and Sex-specific Incidence Rates of Migraine with and without Visual Aura

    Walter F. Stewart;Martha S. Linet;David D. Celentano;Mark Van Natta

  • Changes in Sexual Behavior and a Decline in HIV Infection among Young Men in Thailand

    Kenrad E. Nelson;David D. Celentano;Sakol Eiumtrakol;Donald R. Hoover

  • Sex differences in risk factors for hiv seroconversion among injection drug users: a 10-year perspective.

    Steffanie A. Strathdee;Noya Galai;Mahboobeh Safaiean;David D. Celentano

  • The ALIVE study, a longitudinal study of HIV-1 infection in intravenous drug users: description of methods and characteristics of participants.

    D. Vlahov;J. C. Anthony;A. Munoz;J. Margolick

  • Condom use to prevent incident STDs: the validity of self-reported condom use.

    Jonathan M. Zenilman;Carol S. Weisman;Anne M. Rompalo;Nancy Ellish

  • The NIMH multisite HIV prevention trial: Reducing HIV sexual risk behavior

    D. D. Celentano;C. Dilorio;T. Hartwell;J. Kelly

  • A comparison of HIV/AIDS-related stigma in four countries: negative attitudes and perceived acts of discrimination towards people living with HIV/AIDS.

    Becky L. Genberg;Zdenek Hlavka;Kelika A. Konda;Suzanne Maman

  • Unrecognized HIV infection, risk behaviors, and perceptions of risk among young men who have sex with men: opportunities for advancing HIV prevention in the third decade of HIV/AIDS.

    Duncan A. MacKellar;Linda A. Valleroy;Gina M. Secura;Stephanie Behel

  • Associations of Race/Ethnicity With HIV Prevalence and HIV-Related Behaviors Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in 7 Urban Centers in the United States

    Nina T. Harawa;Sander Greenland;Trista A. Bingham;Denise F. Johnson

  • The Alive Study: A Longitudinal Study of HIV-1 Infection in Intravenous Drug Users: Description of Methods

    David Vlahov;James C. Anthony;Alvaro Muñoz;Joseph Margolick

  • Does marital status matter in an HIV hyperendemic country? Findings from the 2012 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey.

    Olive Shisana;Kathryn Risher;David D Celentano;Nompumelelo Zungu

  • Sex Differences in Risk Factors for HIV Seroconversion Among Injection Drug Users

    Steffanie A. Strathdee;Noya Galai;Mahboobeh Safaiean;David D. Celentano

Frequent Co-Authors

David Vlahov
David Vlahov Yale University
Kenrad Edwin Nelson
Kenrad Edwin Nelson Johns Hopkins University
Carl A. Latkin
Carl A. Latkin Johns Hopkins University
Shruti H. Mehta
Shruti H. Mehta Johns Hopkins University
Chris Beyrer
Chris Beyrer Johns Hopkins University
Susan G. Sherman
Susan G. Sherman Johns Hopkins University
Kenneth H. Mayer
Kenneth H. Mayer Harvard Medical School
Steffanie A. Strathdee
Steffanie A. Strathdee University of California, San Diego
Thomas J. Coates
Thomas J. Coates University of California, Los Angeles
Jonathan M. Zenilman
Jonathan M. Zenilman Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA isn’t limited to traditional medical school routes. Many students and working professionals are turning to online nursing and healthcare degrees for greater flexibility and faster advancement. For registered nurses who want to expand their qualifications, the online rn to bsn no clinicals pathway offers an opportunity to complete a bachelor’s degree without the requirement of additional clinical hours, helping those with busy schedules progress in their careers.

Nursing professionals looking to pursue leadership or advanced clinical roles might consider the fastest msn to dnp program options, designed for those eager to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in the shortest time possible. For an easier transition, some universities offer the easiest dnp program online, which features user-friendly formats and accessible admission requirements.

Starting your medical journey can also begin with practical nursing. The fast track lpn programs online provide a quick, convenient way to start working in healthcare or to serve as a stepping stone to more advanced degrees.

Best Scientists Citing David D. Celentano

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles