World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
12790
World Ranking
6601
National Ranking
2352

David C. Smith publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 84 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

David C. Smith D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Smith is affiliated with the University of Rhode Island in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the field of Engineering, with a special focus on Ocean Engineering. The body of work also extends into subfields including Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research topics cover several areas relevant to both theoretical and applied engineering sciences. These include Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, Drilling and Well Engineering, Offshore Engineering and Technologies, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with David C. Smith include Arthur J. Spivack, Gilles Guérin, Steven D'Hondt, Barry A. Cragg, and Gerald R. Dickens. This network reflects interdisciplinary partnerships largely centered on marine, environmental, and geological engineering studies.

Their recent scholarly publications demonstrate a focus on marine and subseafloor studies as well as broader environmental and fisheries impacts. Notable recent papers include:

  • The contribution of water radiolysis to marine sedimentary life (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Atribacteria Reproducing over Millions of Years in the Atlantic Abyssal Subseafloor (2020, mBio)
  • Atribacteria reproducing over millions of years in the Atlantic abyssal subseafloor (2020, bioRxiv - Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Incorporating Climate Change Impacts Within Harvest Strategies: An Overview of Approaches (2025, Fish and Fisheries)
  • ODP Leg 201, Hole 1230A - Well Logging Data (2021, Zenodo - CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

David C. Smith has contributed extensively to publication venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) and OPAL (Open@LaTrobe, La Trobe University), in addition to journals like Nature Communications, mBio, and Fish and Fisheries. Their publication record indicates an engagement with both open-access repositories and peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Best Publications

  • A simple, economical method for measuring bacterial protein synthesis rates in seawater using 3H-leucine

    D. C Smith;F Azam

  • Intense hydrolytic enzyme activity on marine aggregates and implications for rapid particle dissolution

    David C. Smith;Meinhard Simon;Alice L. Alldredge;Farooq Azam

  • Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment

    Jens Kallmeyer;Robert Pockalny;Rishi Ram Adhikari;David C. Smith

  • Distributions of Microbial Activities in Deep Subseafloor Sediments

    Steven D'Hondt;Bo Barker Jørgensen;D. Jay Miller;Anja Batzke

  • Subtropical Arctic Ocean temperatures during the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum

    Appy Sluijs;Stefan Schouten;Mark Pagani;Martijn Woltering

  • The Cenozoic palaeoenvironment of the Arctic Ocean.

    Kathryn Moran;Jan Backman;Henk Brinkhuis;Steven C. Clemens

  • Abundance and production of bacteria and viruses in the Bering and Chukchi Seas

    Steward Gf;Smith Dc;Azam F

  • Variability in ectohydrolytic enzyme activities of pelagic marine bacteria and its significance for substrate processing in the sea

    Josefina Martinez;David C. Smith;Grieg F. Steward;Farooq Azam

  • Bacteria-organic matter coupling and its significance for oceanic carbon cycling.

    Farooq Azam;D.C. Smith;G. F. Steward;Åke Hagström

  • Bacterial mediation of carbon fluxes during a diatom bloom in a mesocosm

    David C. Smith;Grieg F. Steward;Richard A. Long;Farooq Azam

  • Subseafloor sedimentary life in the South Pacific Gyre

    Steven D’Hondt;Arthur J. Spivack;Robert Pockalny;Timothy G. Ferdelman

  • SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION OF VIRUSES, BACTERIA AND CHLOROPHYLL-A IN NERITIC, OCEANIC AND ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENTS

    William P Cochlan;Johan Wikner;Grieg F Steward;David C Smith

  • Microbial food web structure in the Arabian Sea: a US JGOFS study

    David L. Garrison;Marcia M. Gowing;Margaret P. Hughes;Lisa D. Campbell

  • Characteristics, distribution and persistence of thin layers over a 48 hour period

    M. A. McManus;A. L. Alldredge;A. H. Barnard;Emmanuel Boss

  • Presence of oxygen and aerobic communities from sea floor to basement in deep-sea sediments

    Steven D'hondt;Steven D'hondt;Fumio Inagaki;Fumio Inagaki;Carlos Alvarez Zarikian;Carlos Alvarez Zarikian;Lewis J. Abrams

  • New insights into deformation and fluid flow processes in the Nankai Trough accretionary prism: Results of Ocean Drilling Program Leg 190

    Gregory F. Moore;Asahiko Taira;Adam Klaus;Luann Becker

  • Bacterial diversity and community composition from seasurface to subseafloor

    Emily A Walsh;John B Kirkpatrick;Scott D Rutherford;David C Smith

  • New cell extraction procedure applied to deep subsurface sediments

    Jens Kallmeyer;David C. Smith;Arthur J. Spivack;Steven D'Hondt

  • Blooms of sequence‐specific culturable bacteria in the sea

    Ann-Sofi Rehnstam;Stina Bäckman;David C. Smith;Farooq Azam

  • Molecular analysis of deep subsurface microbial communities in Nankai Trough sediments (ODP Leg 190, Site 1176).

    Konstantinos Ar Kormas;David C Smith;Virginia Edgcomb;Andreas Teske

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven D'Hondt
Steven D'Hondt University of Rhode Island
Farooq Azam
Farooq Azam University of California, San Diego
Grieg F. Steward
Grieg F. Steward University of Hawaii at Manoa
Arthur J. Spivack
Arthur J. Spivack University of Rhode Island
Jens Kallmeyer
Jens Kallmeyer Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Michael T. Montgomery
Michael T. Montgomery Naval Postgraduate School
Timothy G. Ferdelman
Timothy G. Ferdelman Max Planck Society
Gerald R. Dickens
Gerald R. Dickens Trinity College Dublin
William P. Cochlan
William P. Cochlan San Francisco State University
Christopher L. Osburn
Christopher L. Osburn North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths that extend beyond the traditional roles in environmental management and research. For those interested in policy and public administration, pursuing a 1 year mpa online program offers a flexible way to gain leadership skills that are vital for driving sustainable initiatives within government and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding social dynamics is crucial in addressing environmental challenges. An accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into human behavior and community structure, enhancing one’s ability to implement effective environmental policies and education programs.

For educators and professionals aiming to advance their expertise, exploring online edd programs no dissertation can offer a streamlined doctoral path focused on applied research and leadership, making it ideal for those who want to influence environmental education and community outreach efficiently.

Additionally, those looking to build upon their education credentials may consider online eds to edd programs, which provide a cohesive and flexible progression from a specialist degree to a doctoral level, supporting deeper involvement in environmental policy development, educational leadership, or academic research.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Smith

Trending Scientists