World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
19289
World Ranking
3753
National Ranking
1794

Daniele Micciancio publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniele Micciancio sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Daniele Micciancio D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniele Micciancio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • 2001 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Daniele Micciancio is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research contributions span the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on areas such as Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Information Systems.

Their research topics cover diverse aspects of cryptography and data security, privacy-preserving technologies in data, and complexity and algorithms in graphs. More specifically, their work includes cryptographic implementations and security, cryptography and residue arithmetic, coding theory and cryptography, and chaos-based image and signal encryption.

Micciancio's publication record includes articles in several notable venues. Recent papers include:

  • "Collaborative privacy-preserving analysis of oncological data using multiparty homomorphic encryption," 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Semi-Parallel logistic regression for GWAS on encrypted data," 2020, BMC Medical Genomics
  • "Simulation-Secure Threshold PKE from LWE with Polynomial Modulus," 2025, IACR Communications in Cryptology
  • "Fully Composable Homomorphic Encryption," 2025, IACR Communications in Cryptology

Frequent publication venues include:

  • IACR Communications in Cryptology (2 publications)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 publication)
  • BMC Medical Genomics (1 publication)

Their collaborative work often features recurring coauthors, including Baiyu Li, Mark Schultz-Wu, Thomas Ristenpart, Yuriy Polyakov, and Jessica Sorrell.

In addition to articles, Micciancio has contributed to several books published by Springer Science+Business Media. These include multiple editions of "Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO 2020," which have varying citation counts.

The scientist has received recognition in the form of awards, notably being named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2003 and a Hellman Fellow in 2001.

Best Publications

  • Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions Based on Gaussian Measures

    Daniele Micciancio;Oded Regev

  • Trapdoors for lattices: simpler, tighter, faster, smaller

    Daniele Micciancio;Chris Peikert

  • Multicast security: a taxonomy and some efficient constructions

    R. Canetti;J. Garay;G. Itkis;D. Micciancio

  • Lattice Based Cryptography.

    Daniele Micciancio

  • Foundations of group signatures: Formal definitions, simplified requirements, and a construction based on general assumptions

    Mihir Bellare;Daniele Micciancio;Bogdan Warinschi

  • Complexity of lattice problems : a cryptographic perspective

    Daniele Micciancio;S. Goldwasser

  • FHEW: Bootstrapping Homomorphic Encryption in Less Than a Second

    Léo Ducas;Daniele Micciancio

  • Generalized Compact Knapsacks Are Collision Resistant

    Vadim Lyubashevsky;Daniele Micciancio

  • A Deterministic Single Exponential Time Algorithm for Most Lattice Problems Based on Voronoi Cell Computations

    Daniele Micciancio;Panagiotis Voulgaris

  • Complexity of lattice problems

    Daniele Micciancio;S. Goldwasser

  • Hardness of SIS and LWE with Small Parameters.

    Daniele Micciancio;Chris Peikert

  • The Shortest Vector in a Lattice is Hard to Approximate to within Some Constant

    Daniele Micciancio

  • SWIFFT: A Modest Proposal for FFT Hashing

    Vadim Lyubashevsky;Daniele Micciancio;Chris Peikert;Alon Rosen

  • Generalized Compact Knapsacks, Cyclic Lattices, and Efficient One-Way Functions

    Daniele Micciancio

  • Soundness of Formal Encryption in the Presence of Active Adversaries

    Daniele Micciancio;Bogdan Warinschi

  • A New Paradigm for Collision-free Hashing: Incrementality at Reduced Cost.

    Mihir Bellare;Daniele Micciancio

  • The hardness of the closest vector problem with preprocessing

    D. Micciancio

  • Asymptotically Efficient Lattice-Based Digital Signatures

    Vadim Lyubashevsky;Daniele Micciancio

  • Improving Lattice Based Cryptosystems Using the Hermite Normal Form

    Daniele Micciancio

  • Efficient generic forward-secure signatures with an unbounded number of time periods

    Tal Malkin;Daniele Micciancio;Sara Miner

  • Faster exponential time algorithms for the shortest vector problem

    Daniele Micciancio;Panagiotis Voulgaris

Frequent Co-Authors

Bogdan Warinschi
Bogdan Warinschi University of Bristol
Shafi Goldwasser
Shafi Goldwasser University of California, Berkeley
Mihir Bellare
Mihir Bellare University of California, San Diego
Vadim Lyubashevsky
Vadim Lyubashevsky IBM (Switzerland)
Oded Regev
Oded Regev Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Salil P. Vadhan
Salil P. Vadhan Harvard University
Chris Peikert
Chris Peikert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ran Canetti
Ran Canetti Boston University
Amit Sahai
Amit Sahai University of California, Los Angeles
Erez Petrank
Erez Petrank Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree can be a flexible and cost-effective way to advance your career in Computer Science or pivot into related fields. Students seeking a shorter commitment might consider online associate degrees, which can fast-track entry into tech roles or build a foundation for further study.

If affordability is your main concern, researching the cheapest online colleges is essential. Lower tuition rates can lessen your financial burden while still delivering the credentials needed to compete in the workforce.

For those interested in the business side of technology, obtaining a degree from the cheapest online business management degree programs opens pathways to tech management and lead roles. Similarly, an online engineering degree is a logical step for blending Computer Science skills with applied engineering. Exploring the cheapest online engineering degree options can help maximize ROI and job prospects.

Whether your end goal is software development, IT management, or engineering innovation, these affordable online pathways make higher education and dynamic tech careers more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Daniele Micciancio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles