World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
23801
World Ranking
4437
National Ranking
2076

Oded Regev publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oded Regev sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 136 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Oded Regev D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oded Regev sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oded Regev is affiliated with the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Mathematics, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Computer Science. They have contributed to subfields such as Molecular Biology, Applied Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Physics, and Geometry and Topology.

The main topics of their scholarly work include:

  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Point processes and geometric inequalities
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Limits and Structures in Graph Theory

Regev has published extensively across various venues. The most frequent publication outlets consist of:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Science Advances
  • Journal of the ACM

Their recent papers include the following:

  • "Splicing at the phase-separated nuclear speckle interface: a model" (2020), published in Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Dynamics of RNA localization to nuclear speckles are connected to splicing efficiency" (2024), published in Science Advances
  • "Deciphering RNA splicing logic with interpretable machine learning" (2023), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "An Efficient Quantum Factoring Algorithm" (2024), published in Journal of the ACM
  • "RNA molecules display distinctive organization at nuclear speckles" (2024), published in iScience

Frequent co-authors who have contributed to research alongside Regev include:

  • Sneha Paul
  • Jingyi Fei
  • Susan E. Liao
  • Li Wen
  • Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

Best Publications

  • On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography

    Oded Regev

  • On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors over Rings

    Vadim Lyubashevsky;Chris Peikert;Oded Regev

  • Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions Based on Gaussian Measures

    Daniele Micciancio;Oded Regev

  • Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2-ε

    Subhash Khot;Oded Regev

  • Adiabatic Quantum Computation Is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation

    Dorit Aharonov;Wim van Dam;Julia Kempe;Zeph Landau

  • The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem

    Julia Kempe;Alexei Kitaev;Oded Regev

  • Classical hardness of learning with errors

    Zvika Brakerski;Adeline Langlois;Chris Peikert;Oded Regev

  • A Toolkit for Ring-LWE Cryptography.

    Vadim Lyubashevsky;Chris Peikert;Oded Regev

  • Lattice-based cryptography

    Oded Regev

  • New lattice-based cryptographic constructions

    Oded Regev

  • Lattice enumeration using extreme pruning

    Nicolas Gama;Phong Q. Nguyen;Oded Regev

  • The Learning with Errors Problem (Invited Survey)

    Oded Regev

  • Learning a Parallelepiped: Cryptanalysis of GGH and NTRU Signatures

    Phong Q. Nguyen;Oded Regev

  • Lattice problems in NP ∩ coNP

    Dorit Aharonov;Oded Regev

  • Quantum Computation and Lattice Problems

    Oded Regev

  • Globally distributed computation over the Internet-the POPCORN project

    N. Nisan;S. London;O. Regev;N. Camiel

  • Pseudorandomness of ring-LWE for any ring and modulus

    Chris Peikert;Oded Regev;Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

  • Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation

    D. Aharonov;W. van Dam;J. Kempe;Z. Landau

  • Recovering Short Generators of Principal Ideals in Cyclotomic Rings

    Ronald Cramer;Léo Ducas;Chris Peikert;Oded Regev

  • A New Multilayered PCP and the Hardness of Hypergraph Vertex Cover

    Irit Dinur;Venkatesan Guruswami;Subhash Khot;Oded Regev

  • Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2-/spl epsiv/

    S. Khot;O. Regev

Frequent Co-Authors

Julia Kempe
Julia Kempe New York University
Thomas Vidick
Thomas Vidick California Institute of Technology
Chris Peikert
Chris Peikert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ronald de Wolf
Ronald de Wolf University of Amsterdam
Irit Dinur
Irit Dinur Weizmann Institute of Science
Yossi Azar
Yossi Azar Tel Aviv University
Assaf Naor
Assaf Naor Princeton University
Vadim Lyubashevsky
Vadim Lyubashevsky IBM (Switzerland)
Dorit Aharonov
Dorit Aharonov Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Daniele Micciancio
Daniele Micciancio University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the tech industry evolves, students exploring Computer Science in the USA may also consider other valuable fields of study to future-proof their careers. Evaluating the best college degrees for the future can help you identify in-demand programs and adapt to market needs, whether you're interested in software development, data science, or cybersecurity.

For those looking to enhance their credentials with minimal barriers, exploring the easiest masters programs to get into provides options that balance accessibility and career growth. Online learning also makes advanced study more flexible and affordable.

If you’re pursuing research or academia, finding the cheapest online phd can be a smart financial decision. Similarly, fast-track education leadership is possible with the cheapest ed.d online program. These pathways offer both cost-effective and accelerated routes to advanced qualifications—broadening your career options in tech, academia, or organizational leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Oded Regev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles