World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
4714
World Ranking
5674
National Ranking
1931

Daniel L. Roelke publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Roelke sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 126 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Daniel L. Roelke D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Roelke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel L. Roelke is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States, with a research focus primarily in Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work spans several subfields, including Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics covered in their research involve Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, and Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis.

Frequent collaborators in their work include Sierra E. Cagle, Bryan W. Brooks, Joydeb Bhattacharyya, Kevin M. Stroski, and Crista M. Kieley, indicating a strong network in interdisciplinary environmental studies.

They have published multiple articles in notable scientific venues, with repeated contributions to Ecological Modelling as well as publications in Climate, Environmental Science & Technology, Theoretical Population Biology, and Hydrobiologia.

Notable recent papers by Daniel L. Roelke include:

  • Integrating Agriculture and Ecosystems to Find Suitable Adaptations to Climate Change, 2020, Climate
  • Competitive superiority of N-fixing cyanobacteria when fixed N is scarce: Reconsiderations based on a model with heterocyst differentiation, 2022, Ecological Modelling
  • What, How, When, and Where: Spatiotemporal Water Quality Hazards of Cyanotoxins in Subtropical Eutrophic Reservoirs, 2024, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Using YY supermales to destabilize invasive fish populations, 2020, Theoretical Population Biology
  • Tropical macrophytes promote phytoplankton community shifts in lake mesocosms: relevance for lake restoration in warm climates, 2021, Hydrobiologia

Best Publications

  • Autecology of the diatom Pseudonitzschia australis, a domoic acid producer, from Monterey Bay, California

    K. R. Buck;L. Uttalcooke;C. H. Pilskaln;D. L. Roelke

  • The ecophysiology and bloom dynamics of Prymnesium spp.

    Edna Granéli;Bente Edvardsen;Daniel L. Roelke;Johannes A. Hagström

  • Health and Ecological Impacts of Harmful Algal Blooms: Risk Assessment Needs

    Frances M. Van Dolah;Daniel Roelke;Richard M. Greene

  • Growth and toxicity of Prymnesium parvum (Haptophyta) as a function of salinity, light, and temperature

    Jason W. Baker;James P. Grover;Bryan W. Brooks;Fabiola Ureña-Boeck

  • Carbon dioxide exchange in a high marsh on the Texas Gulf Coast: effects of freshwater availability

    F.A. Heinsch;J.L. Heilman;K.J. McInnes;D.R. Cobos

  • Enrichment and detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from water samples using an antibody modified microfluidic chip.

    Udara Dharmasiri;Małgorzata A. Witek;Andre A. Adams;Andre A. Adams;John K. Osiri

  • A decade of fish-killing Prymnesium parvum blooms in Texas: roles of inflow and salinity

    Daniel L. Roelke;James P. Grover;Bryan W. Brooks;Joan Glass

  • A chronicle of a killer alga in the west: ecology, assessment, and management of Prymnesium parvum blooms

    Daniel L. Roelke;Aaron Barkoh;Bryan W. Brooks;James P. Grover

  • A model of phytoplankton competition for limiting and nonlimiting nutrients: Implications for development of estuarine and nearshore management schemes

    D. L. Roelke;P. M. Eldridge;L. A. Cifuentes

  • Effects of nutrient enrichment on Prymnesium parvum population dynamics and toxicity: results from field experiments, Lake Possum Kingdom, USA

    Daniel L. Roelke;Reagan M. Errera;Richard Kiesling;Bryan W. Brooks

  • Copepod food-quality threshold as a mechanism influencing phytoplankton succession and accumulation of biomass, and secondary productivity: a modeling study with management implications

    D.L. Roelke

  • Interactions between flow, periphyton, and nutrients in a heavily impacted urban stream: implications for stream restoration effectiveness

    Justin Murdock;Daniel Roelke;Frances Gelwick

  • Influence of pulsed inflows and nutrient loading on zooplankton and phytoplankton community structure and biomass in microcosm experiments using estuarine assemblages

    Yesim Buyukates;Daniel Roelke

  • Detection of the marine toxins okadaic acid and domoic acid in shellfish and phytoplankton in the Gulf of Mexico.

    Robert W. Dickey;Greta A. Fryxell;H.Ray Granade;Daniel Roelke

  • Prymnesium parvum: An emerging threat to inland waters

    Bryan W. Brooks;James P. Grover;Daniel L. Roelke

  • Seasonally variable riverine production in the Venezuelan llanos

    J. B. Cotner;J. V. Montoya;D. L. Roelke;K. O. Winemiller

  • Nutrient and Phytoplankton Dynamics in a Sewage-Impacted Gulf Coast Estuary: A Field Test of the PEG-Model and Equilibrium Resource Competition Theory

    D. I. Roelke;L. A. Cifuentes;P. M. Eldridge

  • Seasonally varying impact of detritivorous fishes on the benthic ecology of a tropical floodplain river

    Kirk O. Winemiller;José V. Montoya;Daniel L. Roelke;Craig A. Layman

  • The Diversity of Harmful Algal Bloom-Triggering Mechanisms and the Complexity of Bloom Initiation

    Daniel Roelke;Yesim Buyukates

  • Comparison of two domoic acid-producing diatoms: a review

    M. C. Villac;D. L. Roelke;T. A. Villareal;G. A. Fryxell

  • Fundamental predictability in multispecies competition: the influence of large disturbance.

    Daniel Roelke;Sarah Augustine;Yesim Buyukates

Frequent Co-Authors

Bryan W. Brooks
Bryan W. Brooks Baylor University
James P. Grover
James P. Grover The University of Texas at Arlington
Kirk O. Winemiller
Kirk O. Winemiller Texas A&M University
Antonietta Quigg
Antonietta Quigg Texas A&M University at Galveston
James L. Pinckney
James L. Pinckney University of South Carolina
James B. Cotner
James B. Cotner University of Minnesota
Simon M. Mitrovic
Simon M. Mitrovic University of Technology Sydney
Luis A. Cifuentes
Luis A. Cifuentes New Mexico State University
Tracy A. Villareal
Tracy A. Villareal The University of Texas at Austin
Edna Granéli
Edna Granéli Linnaeus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution provides a solid foundation for various science-focused career paths. If you’re interested in how living systems interact—and how to help people thrive within these systems—several masters in child psychology programs are available online. These programs focus on understanding development, behavior, and well-being in young people, often drawing on ecological and evolutionary principles.

For those interested in supporting individuals and communities, consider exploring online master degree programs in counseling. These advance both theoretical knowledge and hands-on skills to prepare graduates for client-centered practice. Similarly, clinical psychologist online programs offer flexible training options for those who want to pursue mental health careers with a strong science background.

If you prefer a broader approach that blends helping professions with community impact, you might look into an online degree in human services. This pathway covers essential skills for supporting diverse populations and is a great fit for those who want to apply ecological perspectives to real-world challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel L. Roelke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles