World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel F. Sahm

Daniel F. Sahm

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 92 632 561 293 243 460 26709

Daniel F. Sahm publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel F. Sahm between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel F. Sahm published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2021. 25 of the 522 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2021. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 5 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 7 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 28 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 16 publications
1976 2025

522 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel F. Sahm: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 1
1985 5
1986 2
1987 1
1988 3
1989 4
1990 1
1991 7
1992 4
1993 3
1994 5
1995 3
1996 2
1997 4
1998 7
1999 13
2000 13
2001 12
2002 28
2003 26
2004 17
2005 6
2006 6
2007 15
2008 26
2009 3
2010 5
2011 5
2012 4
2013 5
2014 13
2015 19
2016 32
2017 25
2018 23
2019 17
2020 27
2021 38
2022 30
2023 34
2024 9
2025 16
Total 522
Download as CSV

Daniel F. Sahm publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. Sahm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 455–464 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 460 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25 460
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Daniel F. Sahm D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. Sahm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27 92
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel F. Sahm is affiliated with IHMA in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Immunology and Microbiology. The scholar's work extends across various subfields, including Molecular Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Pharmacology, Epidemiology, and Clinical Biochemistry.

The scientist's research focuses mainly on several key topics: antibiotic resistance in bacteria, antibiotic use and resistance, antibiotics pharmacokinetics and efficacy, pneumonia and respiratory infections, bacterial identification and susceptibility testing, urinary tract infections management, and infections and bacterial resistance.

Daniel F. Sahm has several frequent collaborators, demonstrating ongoing research partnerships with Katherine Young, Mary Motyl, Meredith Hackel, Sibylle Lob, and Mark G. Wise. These co-authors have contributed significantly to the body of work produced.

Their publications appear regularly in a variety of scientific journals, with a notable volume in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, and International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel F. Sahm include:

  • Trends in Antibiotic Resistance Among Ocular Microorganisms in the United States From 2009 to 2018 (2020), published in JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Reduced susceptibility mechanism to cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, among clinical isolates from a global surveillance programme (SIDERO-WT-2014) (2020), published in Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
  • Epidemiology of Carbapenem Resistance Determinants Identified in Meropenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales Collected as Part of a Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2017 (2021), published in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
  • In Vitro Activity of Imipenem/Relebactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Clinical Isolates of Gram-negative Bacilli With Difficult-to-Treat Resistance and Multidrug-resistant Phenotypes-Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends, United States 2015-2017 (2020), published in Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Taniborbactam and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli from 2018 to 2020: Results from the Global Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance via Surveillance (GEARS) Program (2022), published in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Best Publications

  • Multiple-drug resistant enterococci: the nature of the problem and an agenda for the future.

    Mark M. Huycke;Daniel F. Sahm;Michael S. Gilmore

  • Prevalence in the United States of aac(6′)-Ib-cr Encoding a Ciprofloxacin-Modifying Enzyme

    Chi Hye Park;Ari Robicsek;George A. Jacoby;Daniel Sahm

  • qnr Prevalence in Ceftazidime-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates from the United States

    A. Robicsek;J. Strahilevitz;D. F. Sahm;G. A. Jacoby

  • Relationships between Enterococcal Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance

    L. M. Mundy;D. F. Sahm;M. Gilmore

  • Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Escherichia coli from Female Outpatients in the United States

    James A. Karlowsky;Laurie J. Kelly;Clyde Thornsberry;Mark E. Jones

  • Laboratory-based surveillance of current antimicrobial resistance patterns and trends among Staphylococcus aureus: 2005 status in the United States

    David Styers;Daniel J Sheehan;Patricia Hogan;Daniel F Sahm

  • Surveillance for Antimicrobial Susceptibility among Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii from Hospitalized Patients in the United States, 1998 to 2001

    James A. Karlowsky;Deborah C. Draghi;Mark E. Jones;Clyde Thornsberry

  • Antimicrobial Resistance Among Uropathogens that Cause Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Nationwide Analysis

    Kalpana Gupta;Daniel F. Sahm;David Mayfield;Walter E. Stamm

  • Resistance surveillance of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolated in the United States, 1997-1998.

    Clyde Thornsberry;Mark E. Jones;Mary L. Hickey;Yolanda Mauriz

  • Multidrug-resistant urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli: prevalence and patient demographics in the United States in 2000.

    Daniel F. Sahm;Clyde Thornsberry;David C. Mayfield;Mark E. Jones

  • Emerging resistance among bacterial pathogens in the intensive care unit – a European and North American Surveillance study (2000–2002)

    Mark E Jones;Deborah C Draghi;Clyde Thornsberry;James A Karlowsky

  • Emerging plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance associated with the qnr gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in the United States.

    Minggui Wang;Daniel F. Sahm;George A. Jacoby;David C. Hooper

  • VanE, a New Type of Acquired Glycopeptide Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis BM4405

    Marguerite Fines;Bruno Perichon;Peter Reynolds;Daniel F. Sahm

  • Ocular TRUST: nationwide antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in ocular isolates.

    Penny A. Asbell;Kathryn A. Colby;Sophie Deng;Peter McDonnell

  • Regional Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States: Results from the TRUST Surveillance Program, 1999–2000

    Clyde Thornsberry;Daniel F. Sahm;Laurie J. Kelly;Ian A. Critchley

  • Epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria causing skin and soft tissue infections in the USA and Europe: a guide to appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

    Mark E. Jones;James A. Karlowsky;Deborah C. Draghi;Clyde Thornsberry

  • Antimicrobial resistance in key bloodstream bacterial isolates: electronic surveillance with the Surveillance Network Database--USA.

    Daniel F. Sahm;Mark K. Marsilio;Geriann Piazza

  • Novel plasmid-mediated beta-lactamase (TEM-10) conferring selective resistance to ceftazidime and aztreonam in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

    J P Quinn;D Miyashiro;D Sahm;R Flamm

  • Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from blood cultures of hospitalized patients in the United States in 2002

    James A Karlowsky;Mark E Jones;Deborah C Draghi;Clyde Thornsberry

  • In Vitro Activity of the Siderophore Cephalosporin, Cefiderocol, against Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible and Multidrug-Resistant Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli Collected Worldwide in 2014 to 2016.

    Meredith A. Hackel;Masakatsu Tsuji;Yoshinori Yamano;Roger Echols

  • Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Escherichia coli from Female Outpatients in the

    James A. Karlowsky;Laurie J. Kelly;Clyde Thornsberry;Mark E. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark E. Jones
Mark E. Jones Basilea Pharmaceutica (Switzerland)
Clyde Thornsberry
Clyde Thornsberry Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
James A. Karlowsky
James A. Karlowsky University of Manitoba
Ian A. Critchley
Ian A. Critchley Spero Therapeutics (United States)
Mary Motyl
Mary Motyl MSD (United States)
Karen Bush
Karen Bush Indiana University
Robert K. Flamm
Robert K. Flamm JMI Laboratories
David C. Hooper
David C. Hooper Massachusetts General Hospital
George A. Jacoby
George A. Jacoby Tufts University
Helio S. Sader
Helio S. Sader JMI Laboratories

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Microbiology opens doors to various related fields, including healthcare and information management. For those interested in patient care from a broader perspective, becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner is a promising path that combines microbiological knowledge with holistic health approaches.

Beyond clinical roles, the healthcare industry increasingly relies on accurate data management. Pursuing a certified professional coder (CPC) credential offers a specialized skill set in medical coding, essential for patient record accuracy and billing processes.

Another growing area is health information management. Understanding how to manage medical data effectively is crucial, with roles such as those covered under health information management salary entry-level highlighting strong demand and competitive compensation for new graduates.

For those wanting to advance in this field, selecting one of the best online health information management degree CAHIIM accredited programs ensures quality education that meets industry standards and enhances career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel F. Sahm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles