World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

R.M. Joeckel publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.M. Joeckel sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

R.M. Joeckel D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.M. Joeckel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

R.M. Joeckel is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. The research work focuses primarily on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with substantial contributions in subfields including Ecology, Paleontology, Earth-Surface Processes, Environmental Engineering, and Atmospheric Science.

The major research topics covered by Joeckel's publications include:

  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Geological formations and processes
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
  • Landslides and related hazards

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Joeckel provide insight into the scope and focus of their work. Notable publications include:

  • Berriasian-Valanginian Geochronology and Carbon-Isotope Stratigraphy of the Yellow Cat Member, Cedar Mountain Formation, Eastern Utah, USA, 2023, in Geosciences
  • Exhumed fluvial landforms reveal evolution of late Eocene-Pliocene rivers on the Central and Northern Great Plains, USA, 2023, in Geosphere
  • Genesis of giant, bouldery bars in a Miocene gravel-bed river: Insights from outcrop sedimentology, UAS-SfM photogrammetry, and GPR, 2020, in Journal of Sedimentary Research
  • Reconstruction of pre-Illinoian ice margins and glaciotectonic structures from airborne ElectroMagnetic (AEM) surveys at the western limit of Laurentide glaciation, Midcontinent U.S.A., 2021, in Quaternary Science Advances
  • Impact of Bank Stabilization Structures on Upstream and Downstream Bank Mobilization at Cedar River, Nebraska, 2021, in Transactions of the ASABE

Joeckel frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Jesse T. Korus
  • Andreas Möller
  • Marina B. Suarez
  • Noah M. McLean
  • Gregory A. Ludvigson

The primary venues for Joeckel's publications include:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Geosciences
  • Geosphere
  • Transactions of the ASABE
  • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology

Best Publications

  • Annual monsoon rains recorded by Jurassic dunes.

    David B. Loope;Clinton M. Rowe;R. Matthew Joeckel

  • Mass-balance reconstruction of a modern Vertisol : implications for interpreting the geochemistry and burial alteration of paleo-Vertisols

    Steven G. Driese;Claudia I. Mora;Cynthia A. Stiles;R.M. Joeckel

  • Impact of Longer-Term Modest Climate Shifts on Architecture of High-Frequency Sequences (Cyclothems), Pennsylvanian of Midcontinent U.S.A.

    Howard R. Feldman;Evan K. Franseen;R.M. Joeckel;Philip H. Heckel

  • Sulfate-mineral crusts from pyrite weathering and acid rock drainage in the Dakota Formation and Graneros Shale, Jefferson County, Nebraska

    R.M. Joeckel;B.J. Ang Clement;L.R. VanFleet Bates

  • Late Albian Kiowa-Skull Creek Marine Transgression, Lower Dakota Formation, Eastern Margin of Western Interior Seaway, U.S.A.

    Richard L. Brenner;Greg A. Ludvigson;B.J. Witzke;A.N. Zawistoski

  • Recognizing the Albian-Cenomanian (OAE1d) sequence boundary using plant carbon isotopes: Dakota Formation, Western Interior Basin, USA

    Darren R. Gröcke;Gregory A. Ludvigson;Brian L. Witzke;Stuart A. Robinson

  • Correlation of Aptian-Albian Carbon Isotope Excursions in Continental Strata of the Cretaceous Foreland Basin, Eastern Utah, U.S.A.

    Greg A. Ludvigson;R.M. Joeckel;Luis A. González;Erik L. Gulbranson

  • Progressive abandonment and planform changes of the central Platte River in Nebraska, central USA, over historical timeframes

    J.D. Horn;R.M. Joeckel;C.R. Fielding

  • Middle to Late Pleistocene loess record in eastern Nebraska, USA, and implications for the unique nature of Oxygen Isotope Stage 2

    J.A. Mason;R.M. Joeckel;E.A. Bettis

  • Paleosols Below the Ames Marine Unit (Upper Pennsylvanian, Conemaugh Group) in the Appalachian Basin, U.S.A.: Variability on an Ancient Depositional Landscape

    R. M. Joeckel

  • Channel and island change in the lower Platte River, Eastern Nebraska, USA: 1855–2005

    R.M. Joeckel;G.M. Henebry

  • Late Holocene dune activity in the Eastern Platte River Valley, Nebraska

    P.R. Hanson;R.M. Joeckel;A.R. Young;J. Horn

  • The emerging terrestrial record of aptian-albian global change

    G. A. Ludvigson;R. M. Joeckel;L. R. Murphy;Daniel Stockli

  • Megadroughts and late Holocene dune activation at the eastern margin of the Great Plains, north-central Kansas, USA

    P.R. Hanson;A.F. Arbogast;W.C. Johnson;R.M. Joeckel

  • Revision of Platte River Alluvial Facies Model Through Observations of Extant Channels and Barforms, and Subsurface Alluvial Valley Fills

    John D. Horn;Christopher R. Fielding;R. M. Joeckel

  • Fluvial-estuarine reinterpretation of large, isolated sandstone bodies in epicontinental cyclothems, Upper Pennsylvanian, northern Midcontinent, USA, and their significance for understanding late Paleozoic sea-level fluctuations

    S.A. Fischbein;R.M. Joeckel;C.R. Fielding

  • Laser diffraction analysis of the disintegration of aeolian sedimentary aggregates in water

    Joseph A Mason;Richard Greene;Robert M Joeckel

  • Geomorphic and hydrologic controls of dust emissions during drought from Yellow Lake playa, West Texas, USA

    M.R. Sweeney;V.A. Zlotnik;R.M. Joeckel;J.E. Stout

  • Soils, surficial geology, and geomicrobiology of saline-sodic wetlands, North Platte River Valley, Nebraska, USA

    R.M. Joeckel;B.J. Ang Clement

  • Reply to comment on “Progressive abandonment and planform changes of the central Platte River in Nebraska, central USA, over historical timeframes”

    John Daniel Horn;Christopher Fielding;Robert M. Joeckel

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher R. Fielding
Christopher R. Fielding University of Connecticut
Luis A. González
Luis A. González University of Kansas
Joseph A. Mason
Joseph A. Mason University of Wisconsin–Madison
Darren R. Gröcke
Darren R. Gröcke Durham University
Yongsong Huang
Yongsong Huang Brown University
Dennis A. Bazylinski
Dennis A. Bazylinski University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Neil M.J. Crout
Neil M.J. Crout University of Nottingham
Sherilyn C. Fritz
Sherilyn C. Fritz University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Geoffrey M. Henebry
Geoffrey M. Henebry Michigan State University
Thomas B. Moorman
Thomas B. Moorman Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths, from environmental consulting to geotechnical engineering. As the field evolves, many students and professionals consider complementary online degrees to broaden their expertise and improve career prospects.

For those interested in management roles within environmental organizations or research agencies, an online masters in human resource management can offer valuable skills in leadership and personnel development.

The rise in accessible education has also encouraged lifelong learners, including seniors, to explore new interests. Open learning options like open university free courses for over 60s enable mature students to engage with Earth Science topics or related fields at their own pace.

Additionally, integrating Earth Science knowledge with information management is increasingly important. Programs such as ala accredited mlis programs provide skills for managing scientific data and resources effectively.

For those inclined toward organizing and disseminating scientific research, pursuing a library science masters can be a strategic move, combining Earth Science expertise with information curation and archival skills.

Best Scientists Citing R.M. Joeckel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles