World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
36
Citations
4678
World Ranking
1617
National Ranking
473

D. H. Crews publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. H. Crews sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 66 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

D. H. Crews D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. H. Crews sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

D. H. Crews was affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States during their academic career. Their research contributions are documented, though no specific recent papers or co-authors have been recorded in the available data.

The scientist's professional record does not include details on publication venues, fields or subfields of study, or topics of research within the accessible information. Likewise, there are no listed book publications or awards associated with their name.

As the individual is noted as deceased, all references to their work are presented in the past tense. The data does not provide further specific insights into their scholarly output or areas of specialization.

Best Publications

  • Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers.

    A. K. Kelly;M. McGee;D. H. Crews;A. G. Fahey

  • Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls.

    J. J. Crowley;J. J. Crowley;M. McGee;D. A. Kenny;D. H. Crews

  • Effect of bunk management on feeding behavior, ruminal acidosis and performance of feedlot cattle: A review

    K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein;K. A. Beauchemin;D. J. Gibb;D. H. Crews

  • Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle.

    J. D. Nkrumah;J. A. Basarab;Z. Wang;C. Li;C. Li

  • Sex reversal by estradiol in three reptilian orders

    James J Bull;W. H.N. Gutzke;David P Crews

  • Characterization of feed efficiency traits and relationships with feeding behavior and ultrasound carcass traits in growing bulls

    P. A. Lancaster;G. E. Carstens;F. R. B. Ribeiro;L. O. Tedeschi

  • Test duration for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency in beef cattle using the GrowSafe System

    Z. Wang;J. D. Nkrumah;C. Li;C. Li;J. A. Basarab

  • Repeatability of feed efficiency, carcass ultrasound, feeding behavior, and blood metabolic variables in finishing heifers divergently selected for residual feed intake.

    A. K. Kelly;M. McGee;D. H. Crews;T. Sweeney

  • Primary genome scan to identify putative quantitative trait loci for feedlot growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency of beef cattle.

    J. D. Nkrumah;E. L. Sherman;C. Li;C. Li;E. Marques

  • Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers.

    P. A. Lancaster;G. E. Carstens;D. H. Crews;T. H. Welsh

  • Grass silage intake, rumen and blood variables, ultrasonic and body measurements, feeding behavior, and activity in pregnant beef heifers differing in phenotypic residual feed intake

    P. Lawrence;D. A. Kenny;D. A. Kenny;B. Earley;D. H. Crews

  • Genetic parameters for carcass traits and their live animal indicators in Simmental cattle.

    D. H. Crews;E. J. Pollak;R. L. Weaber;R. L. Quaas

  • Phenotypic and genetic relationships of feed efficiency with growth performance, ultrasound, and carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais steers.

    F. Mao;L. Chen;M. Vinsky;E. Okine

  • Genetic parameters for ultrasound and carcass measures of yield and quality among replacement and slaughter beef cattle.

    D H Crews;R A Kemp

  • 3H-estradiol, 3H-testosterone and 3H-dihydrotestosterone localization in the brain of the lizard Anolis carolinensis: an autoradiographic study.

    J. I. Morrell;David P Crews;A. Ballin;A. Morgentaler

  • Genetic relationships between feed efficiency in growing males and beef cow performance

    J. J. Crowley;R. D. Evans;N. Mc Hugh;N. Mc Hugh;D. A. Kenny

  • Genetic and phenotypic relationships of serum leptin concentration with performance, efficiency of gain, and carcass merit of feedlot cattle

    J. D. Nkrumah;D. H. Keisler;D. H. Crews;J. A. Basarab

  • Genetic parameters for calving ease, gestation length, and birth weight in Charolais cattle.

    F. D. N. Mujibi;D. H. Crews;D. H. Crews

  • Effect of feed restriction during calfhood on serum concentrations of metabolic hormones, gonadotropins, testosterone, and on sexual development in bulls.

    Unknown

  • Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.

    L. Chen;F. Schenkel;M. Vinsky;D. H. Crews

  • Relationship between feeding behavior and performance of feedlot steers fed barley-based diets.

    K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein;D. D. Hickman;D. D. Hickman;M. A. Shah;C. R. Krehbiel

  • Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.

    F. D. N. Mujibi;J. D. Nkrumah;O. N. Durunna;P. Stothard

  • Relationship between body measurements, metabolic hormones, metabolites and residual feed intake in performancetested pedigree beef bulls

    A.K. Kelly;M. McGee;D.H. Crews;C.O. Lynch

  • Genetic and phenotypic correlations among feed efficiency, production and selected conformation traits in dairy cows.

    G. Manafiazar;L. Goonewardene;F. Miglior;D.H. Crews

  • Genetic associations between feed efficiency measured in a performance test station and performance of growing cattle in commercial beef herds.

    J. J. Crowley;R. D. Evans;N. Mc Hugh;N. Mc Hugh;T. Pabiou

  • Genetic parameters for intramuscular fat percentage, marbling score, scrotal circumference, and heifer pregnancy in Red Angus cattle.

    C. M. McAllister;S. E. Speidel;D. H. Crews;R. M. Enns

  • Phenotypic and genetic relationships of feeding behavior with feed intake, growth performance, feed efficiency, and carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais steers.

    L. Chen;F. Mao;D. H. Crews;M. Vinsky

  • Associations of marker panel scores with feed intake and efficiency traits in beef cattle using preselected single nucleotide polymorphisms

    F. D. N. Mujibi;J. D. Nkrumah;O. N. Durunna;J. R. Grant

  • Genetic analysis of longitudinal data in beef cattle: a review.

    Speidel Se;Enns Rm;Crews Dh

  • Relationships among performance, residual feed intake, and product quality of progeny from Red Angus sires divergent for maintenance energy EPD.

    C. M. Welch;J. K. Ahola;J. B. Hall;G. K. Murdoch

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Kenny
David A. Kenny Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Mark McGee
Mark McGee Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Changxi Li
Changxi Li Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
Ross D Evans
Ross D Evans Wageningen University & Research
John A. Basarab
John A. Basarab University of Alberta
Gordon E. Carstens
Gordon E. Carstens Texas A&M University
Donagh P. Berry
Donagh P. Berry Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Erasmus K. Okine
Erasmus K. Okine University of Lethbridge
Stephen S. Moore
Stephen S. Moore University of Queensland
Luis O. Tedeschi
Luis O. Tedeschi Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Animal Science and Veterinary fields opens doors to diverse career paths beyond traditional roles. For those interested in counseling within animal-related or family settings, pursuing a marriage and family therapy masters programs online offers a flexible way to gain essential skills that complement animal care professions.

Advanced academic pursuits such as an online PhD in counseling can further enhance expertise, enabling professionals to specialize in behavioral health aspects of both human and animal populations, an area gaining importance in holistic veterinary practices.

If your passion lies strictly with animals, discovering the best animal degree programs online can pave the way for careers in wildlife management, veterinary technology, and animal welfare advocacy, ensuring you stay competitive in this evolving field.

Interestingly, skills gained through Animal Science and Veterinary studies can also lead to leadership roles in sports and education sectors. For instance, learning how to become an athletic director shows a unique career crossover that combines organizational and animal-related knowledge, especially in managing animal therapy or equine programs.

Best Scientists Citing D. H. Crews

Recently Published Articles