World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
16274
World Ranking
8373
National Ranking
4461

Clark McCauley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clark McCauley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Clark McCauley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clark McCauley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clark McCauley is affiliated with Bryn Mawr College in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the field of Social Sciences, with notable focus on Sociology and Political Science. Their research intersects areas of Social Psychology and Philosophy, with occasional work in Insect Science and Clinical Psychology.

Their scholarly output emphasizes terrorism, counterterrorism, and political violence alongside social and intergroup psychology. Other thematic interests include war ethics and justification, cultural differences and values, bullying, victimization and aggression, insect and pesticide research, and crime patterns and interventions.

The list of frequent publication venues for their work includes:

  • Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict
  • Terrorism and Political Violence
  • Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
  • Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College)
  • The Journal of Intelligence Conflict and Warfare

Clark McCauley has collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors, including:

  • Sophia Moskalenko
  • Tomislav Pavlović
  • Christian Leuprecht
  • David B. Skillicorn
  • Joshua D. Freilich

Their recent papers include:

  • "The ABC Model: Commentary from the Perspective of the Two Pyramids Model of Radicalization", 2020, Terrorism and Political Violence
  • "Bifactor analyses provide uncorrelated measures of activism intentions and radicalism intentions", 2021, Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict
  • "Two classes of political activists: evidence from surveys of U.S. college students and U.S. prisoners", 2022, Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression
  • "Growth opportunities in American and British terrorism research", 2023, Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict
  • "Introduction to the Special Issue: putting the Capitol Breach in context", 2021, Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

Clark McCauley has also published a book titled Radicalization to Terrorism with Oxford University Press in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Jobs, Careers, and Callings: People's Relations to Their Work

    Amy Wrzesniewski;Clark McCauley;Paul Rozin;Barry Schwartz

  • Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors

    Jonathan Haidt;Clark McCauley;Paul Rozin

  • Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism

    Clark McCauley;Sophia Moskalenko

  • Body, Psyche, and Culture: The Relationship between Disgust and Morality

    Jonathan Haidt;Paul Rozin;Clark Mccauley;Sumio Imada

  • Measuring Political Mobilization: The Distinction Between Activism and Radicalism

    Sophia Moskalenko;Clark McCauley

  • Friction: How Radicalization Happens to Them and Us

    Clark R. McCauley;Sophia Moskalenko

  • Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction.

    Clark McCauley;Christopher L. Stitt;Mary Segal

  • Understanding Political Radicalization: The Two-Pyramids Model

    Clark R. McCauley;Sophia Moskalenko

  • An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes.

    Clark McCauley;Christopher L. Stitt

  • Disgust: The Body and Soul Emotion

    Paul Rozin;Jonathan Haidt;Clark R. McCauley

  • Stereotype Accuracy: Toward Appreciating Group Differences.

    Yueh-Ting Lee;Lee J. Jussim;Clark R. McCauley

  • Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity: Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper-and-Pencil versus Behavioral Measures

    Paul Rozin;Jonathan Haidt;Clark McCauley;Lance Dunlop

  • The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization.

    Clark McCauley

  • Threat, Dehumanization, and Support for Retaliatory Aggressive Policies in Asymmetric Conflict:

    Ifat Maoz;Clark McCauley

  • Psychological issues in understanding terrorism and the response to terrorism.

    Clark McCauley

  • Toward a Profile of Lone Wolf Terrorists: What Moves an Individual From Radical Opinion to Radical Action

    Clark McCauley;Sophia Moskalenko

  • Sensitivity to indirect contacts with other persons: AIDS aversion as a composite of aversion to strangers, infection, moral taint, and misfortune.

    Paul Rozin;Maureen Markwith;Clark McCauley

  • Psychological Correlates of Support for Compromise: A Polling Study of Jewish-Israeli Attitudes toward Solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

    Ifat Maoz;Clark McCauley

  • The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis.

    Clark McCauley;Susan Jacques

  • Group Identification under Conditions of Threat: College Students' Attachment to Country, Family, Ethnicity, Religion, and University Before and After September 11, 2001

    Sophia Moskalenko;Clark McCauley;Paul Rozin

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Rozin
Paul Rozin University of Pennsylvania
Lee Jussim
Lee Jussim Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jonathan Haidt
Jonathan Haidt New York University
Gretchen B. Chapman
Gretchen B. Chapman Carnegie Mellon University
A.B. Cohen
A.B. Cohen Arizona State University
Scott Atran
Scott Atran University of Oxford
Sonia Roccas
Sonia Roccas Open University of Israel
Joseph P. Newman
Joseph P. Newman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Richard S. John
Richard S. John University of Southern California
Emily B. Falk
Emily B. Falk University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to many rewarding careers in counseling, education, and mental health services. With the rise of online programs, earning credentials has become more accessible. Yet, it’s important to understand state-specific requirements for various career paths—especially if you’re interested in school counseling.

For those considering a school counselor role, each state has unique standards and certification steps. For example, Montana school counselor certification requirements include specific coursework and practical experiences. Similarly, if you are interested in becoming a school counselor in Nebraska, you'll need to meet education and internship criteria particular to that state.

Before enrolling in any program, research whether your chosen online degree meets the licensure requirements where you plan to work. For example, those eyeing Nevada should investigate the Nevada school counselor certification requirements. Similarly, professionals pursuing becoming a school counselor in New Hampshire must understand local regulations.

By choosing an accredited online psychology program tailored to your state’s licensure demands, you can start on a clear path to a fulfilling career in school counseling or other mental health professions.

Best Scientists Citing Clark McCauley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles