World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
54
Citations
7996
World Ranking
485
National Ranking
170

Burk A. Dehority publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burk A. Dehority sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 177 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Burk A. Dehority D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burk A. Dehority sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

Burk A. Dehority was affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States during their academic career. The available data does not list any recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues connected with their research output.

There is no detailed record of specific fields or subfields of study attributed to Burk A. Dehority, nor any main topics of work explicitly documented in the accessible information.

The scientist did not have documented book publications or listed awards within the available records. The lack of such data suggests that either these contributions were not present or not captured in the source information.

Burk A. Dehority is recorded as deceased.

Best Publications

  • Electricity generation from cellulose by rumen microorganisms in microbial fuel cells

    Hamid Rismani-Yazdi;Ann D. Christy;Burk A. Dehority;Mark Morrison;Mark Morrison

  • Effects of long-chain Fatty acids on growth of rumen bacteria.

    A. E. Maczulak;B. A. Dehority;D. L. Palmquist

  • Effect of starch on the digestion of cellulose in vitro and in vivo by rumen microorganisms.

    K. El-shazly;B. A. Dehority;R. R. Johnson

  • Effect of external resistance on bacterial diversity and metabolism in cellulose-fed microbial fuel cells.

    Hamid Rismani-Yazdi;Ann D. Christy;Sarah M. Carver;Zhongtang Yu

  • Vitamin Requirements of Several Cellulolytic Rumen Bacteria

    Unknown

  • Extent of Cellulose and Hemicellulose Digestion in Various Forages by Pure Cultures of Rumen Bacteria

    B.A. Dehority;H.W. Scott

  • Corn Plant Maturity. II. Effect on In Vitro Cellulose Digestibility and Soluble Carbohydrate Content

    Ronald R. Johnson;Tikam L. Balwani;L. J. Johnson;K. E. McClure

  • Phylogeny of the Rumen Ciliates Entodinium, Epidinium and Polyplastron (Litostomatea : Entodiniomorphida) Inferred from Small Subunit Ribosomal RNA Sequences

    André-Deenis G. Wright;Burk A. Dehority;Denis H. Lynn

  • Effect of prolonged high-concentrate feeding on ruminal protozoa concentrations.

    Unknown

  • Pectin-fermenting Bacteria Isolated from the Bovine Rumen

    Unknown

  • Effect of Particle Size upon the in Vitro Cellulose Digestibility of Forages by Rumen Bacteria

    B.A. Dehority;R.R. Johnson

  • Synergism in Degradation and Utilization of Intact Forage Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Pectin by Three Pure Cultures of Ruminal Bacteria

    J. M. Osborne;B. A. Dehority

  • Interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forages.

    M Fondevila;B A Dehority

  • Development of, and natural fluctuations in, rumen microbial populations

    Unknown

  • Effects of diet and hindgut defaunation on diet digestibility and microbial concentrations in the cecum and colon of the horse.

    B E Moore;B A Dehority

  • Effects of an abrupt diet change from hay to concentrate on microbial numbers and physical environment in the cecum of the pony

    Unknown

  • Effects of an abrupt change in ration from all roughage to high concentrate upon rumen microbial numbers in sheep.

    Jean A. Grubb;B. A. Dehority

  • Degradation and utilization of hemicellulose from intact forages by pure cultures of rumen bacteria.

    Judith A. Coen;B. A. Dehority

  • Most-probable-number procedures for enumerating ruminal bacteria, including the simultaneous estimation of total and cellulolytic numbers in one medium

    Unknown

  • Digestibility of Forage Hemicellulose and Pectin by Rumen Bacteria in Vitro and the Effect of Lignification Thereon

    B.A. Dehority;R.R. Johnson;H.R. Conrad

  • Characterization of Several Bovine Rumen Bacteria Isolated with a Xylan Medium

    Unknown

  • Rumen Ciliate Fauna of Alaskan Moose (Alces americana), Musk‐Ox (Ovibos moschatus) and Dall Mountain Sheep (Ovis dalli)

    B. A. Dehority

  • Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria.

    N E Obispo;B A Dehority

  • Effects of microbial synergism on fibre digestion in the rumen.

    Burk A. Dehority

  • Basal medium for the selective enumeration of rumen bacteria utilizing specific energy sources.

    B A Dehority;J A Grubb

  • Effect of Short-Term Chilling of Rumen Contents on Viable Bacterial Numbers

    Burk A. Dehority;Jean A. Grubb

  • Biochemical and Microscopic Comparison of in vivo and in vitro Rumen Fermentations

    K. el-Shazly;R. R. Johnson;B. A. Dehority;A. L. Moxon

Frequent Co-Authors

F. L. Fluharty
F. L. Fluharty The Ohio State University
Zhongtang Yu
Zhongtang Yu The Ohio State University
Mark Morrison
Mark Morrison University of Queensland
Steven Christopher Loerch
Steven Christopher Loerch The Ohio State University
Denis H. Lynn
Denis H. Lynn University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond traditional Animal Science and Veterinary programs, various online degrees offer flexible options to enhance career prospects. For example, professionals considering a focus on mental health and counseling can explore mft master's programs online, which provide specialized training in family therapy and client support.

If pursuing advanced credentials is a priority, the online doctorate in counseling offers a cost-effective path to expertise that can complement work in animal-assisted therapy or rehabilitation.

Many graduates also aim to discover well-paying roles aligned with their passion for animals. Resources listing jobs with animals that pay well provide valuable insights into careers ranging from wildlife management to veterinary specialties.

For those interested in leadership roles within sports programs or animal-related organizations, exploring the role of an athletic director can offer a unique career pathway that blends management skills with a passion for wellness and education.

Best Scientists Citing Burk A. Dehority

Recently Published Articles