World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
8648
World Ranking
8133
National Ranking
4363

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
9402
World Ranking
7554
National Ranking
3256

Brian T. Gold publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian T. Gold sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 147 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Brian T. Gold D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian T. Gold sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian T. Gold is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on various facets of neuroscience and medicine, with specific attention to advanced neuroimaging techniques, dementia and cognitive impairment, and neurological disease mechanisms and treatments.

Their work encompasses several main fields of study:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Key subfields of their research include:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Physiology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Brian T. Gold contributes to a range of topics within their research domain, such as:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The scientist has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Christopher E. Bauer
  • Danny J.J. Wang
  • Gregory A. Jicha
  • Valentinos Zachariou
  • Pauline Maillard

Brian T. Gold has published in numerous venues, with a particular emphasis on Alzheimer's and Dementia research as well as neuroimaging. Recurring publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • NeuroImage
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Some of the recent papers they have contributed to are:

  • Water exchange rate across the blood-brain barrier is associated with CSF amyloid-β 42 in healthy older adults, 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: II. Neuroimaging protocols, 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Instrumental validation of free water, peak-width of skeletonized mean diffusivity, and white matter hyperintensities: MarkVCID neuroimaging kits, 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • Cross-Vendor Test-Retest Validation of Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis along the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS) for Evaluating Glymphatic System Function, 2023, Aging and Disease
  • Brain arteriolosclerosis, 2020, Acta Neuropathologica

Best Publications

  • Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance

    Yaakov Stern;Eider M. Arenaza-Urquijo;David Bartrés-Faz;Sylvie Belleville

  • The seats of reason? An imaging study of deductive and inductive reasoning.

    Vinod Goel;Brian Gold;Shitij Kapur;Sylvain Houle

  • Lifelong Bilingualism Maintains Neural Efficiency for Cognitive Control in Aging

    Brian T. Gold;Chobok Kim;Nathan F. Johnson;Richard J. Kryscio

  • Common prefrontal regions coactivate with dissociable posterior regions during controlled semantic and phonological tasks

    Brian T Gold;Brian T Gold;Randy L Buckner;Randy L Buckner;Randy L Buckner

  • Domain general and domain preferential brain regions associated with different types of task switching: A Meta‐Analysis

    Chobok Kim;Sara E. Cilles;Nathan F. Johnson;Brian T. Gold

  • Dissociation of Automatic and Strategic Lexical-Semantics: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for Differing Roles of Multiple Frontotemporal Regions

    Brian T. Gold;David A. Balota;Sara J. Jones;David K. Powell

  • Neuroanatomical Correlates of Human Reasoning

    Vinod Goel;Brian Gold;Shitij Kapur;Sylvain Houle

  • Functional Dissociation in Frontal and Striatal Areas for Processing of Positive and Negative Reward Information

    Xun Liu;David K Powell;Hongbin Wang;Brian T Gold

  • Brain arteriolosclerosis

    Unknown

  • Common and Distinct Mechanisms of Cognitive Flexibility in Prefrontal Cortex

    Chobok Kim;Nathan F. Johnson;Sara E. Cilles;Brian T. Gold

  • Lifelong bilingualism contributes to cognitive reserve against white matter integrity declines in aging

    Brian T. Gold;Nathan F. Johnson;David K. Powell

  • Age-related slowing of task switching is associated with decreased integrity of frontoparietal white matter.

    Brian T. Gold;David K. Powell;Liang Xuan;Greg A. Jicha

  • Common and Dissociable Activation Patterns Associated with Controlled Semantic and Phonological Processing: Evidence from fMRI Adaptation

    Brian T. Gold;Dave A. Balota;Brenda A. Kirchhoff;Randy L. Buckner

  • White matter integrity and vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease: preliminary findings and future directions.

    Brian T. Gold;Nathan F. Johnson;David K. Powell;Charles D. Smith

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness is positively correlated with cerebral white matter integrity in healthy seniors

    Nathan F. Johnson;Chobok Kim;Jody L. Clasey;Alison Bailey

  • Alzheimer's Disease in Down Syndrome.

    Elizabeth Head;David Powell;Brian T Gold;Frederick A Schmitt

  • Alterations in Multiple Measures of White Matter Integrity in Normal Women at High Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

    Brian T. Gold;David K. Powell;Anders H. Andersen;Charles D. Smith

  • Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition

    Brian T. Gold;Kathleen Rastle

  • White matter diffusion alterations in normal women at risk of Alzheimer's disease

    Charles D. Smith;Himachandra Chebrolu;Anders H. Andersen;David A. Powell

  • Right Hemisphere Semantic Processing of Visual Words in an Aphasic Patient: An fMRI Study ☆

    Brian T. Gold;Andrew Kertesz;Andrew Kertesz

  • Speed of lexical decision correlates with diffusion anisotropy in left parietal and frontal white matter: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging.

    Brian T. Gold;David K. Powell;Liang Xuan;Yang Jiang

  • Neural correlates of cross-domain affective priming

    Qin Zhang;Xiaohua Li;Brian T. Gold;Yang Jiang

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles D. Smith
Charles D. Smith University of Kentucky
Gregory A. Jicha
Gregory A. Jicha University of Kentucky
Frederick A. Schmitt
Frederick A. Schmitt University of Kentucky
Peter T. Nelson
Peter T. Nelson University of Kentucky
Elizabeth Head
Elizabeth Head University of California, Irvine
Larry B. Goldstein
Larry B. Goldstein University of Kentucky
Randy L. Buckner
Randy L. Buckner Harvard University
Jeffrey N. Keller
Jeffrey N. Keller Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Linda J. Van Eldik
Linda J. Van Eldik University of Kentucky
Vinod Goel
Vinod Goel York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding career options. If you’re interested in combining flexibility with speed, consider accelerated online degrees. These programs allow you to complete your studies faster and often at a lower cost, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

For those seeking the best financial outcomes, exploring the highest paid degrees can provide insight into which majors offer strong salary prospects—both within and beyond neuroscience. Degree choices that align with the most profitable degrees often lead to careers in biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, research, and healthcare management.

If affordability is a top concern, many students opt for one of the cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA. This makes it easier to balance educational aspirations with personal budgets. Ultimately, choosing the right online program is crucial for maximizing your future opportunities in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Brian T. Gold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles