World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
7914
World Ranking
13366
National Ranking
5350

Benjamin N. Grosof publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin N. Grosof sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 80 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Benjamin N. Grosof D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin N. Grosof sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin N. Grosof is affiliated with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in the United States. Their research contributions encompass multiple areas within computer science and decision sciences, with a focus on artificial intelligence and information systems.

The scientist has contributed to the following publication venues:

  • AI Magazine

Their recent paper includes:

  • "A community-driven vision for a new knowledge resource for AI," published in 2025 in AI Magazine

Frequent collaborators in their research work include:

  • Michael Kifer
  • Theresa Swift
  • Paul Fodor
  • Janine Bloomfield
  • Vinay K. Chaudhri

Benjamin N. Grosof's main fields of study are:

  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences

The subfields they focus on are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems and Management

The key topics of their scholarly work include:

  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management

Best Publications

  • Description Logic Programs: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic

    Benjamin Grosof;Ian Horrocks;Raphael Volz;Stefan Decker

  • Itinerant agents for mobile computing

    D. Chess;B. Grosof;C. Harrison;D. Levine

  • Delegation logic: A logic-based approach to distributed authorization

    Ninghui Li;Benjamin N. Grosof;Joan Feigenbaum

  • Supporting rule system interoperability on the semantic web with SWRL

    Martin O'connor;Holger Knublauch;Samson Tu;Benjamin Grosof

  • A Declarative Approach to Business Rules in Contracts: Courteous Logic Programs in XML

    Benjamin N. Grosof;Yannis Labrou;Hoi Y. Chan

  • A declarative approach to business rules in contracts: courteous logic programs in XML

    Unknown

  • SweetDeal: representing agent contracts with exceptions using XML rules, ontologies, and process descriptions

    Benjamin N. Grosof;Terrence C. Poon

  • A practically implementable and tractable delegation logic

    Ninghui Li;B. Grosof;J. Feigenbaum

  • A logic-based knowledge representation for authorization with delegation

    Ninghui Li;J. Feigenbaum;B.N. Grosof

  • Automated Negotiation from Declarative Contract Descriptions

    Daniel M. Reeves;Michael P. Wellman;Benjamin N. Grosof

  • Prioritized Conflict Handling for Logic Programs.

    Benjamin N. Grosof

  • Combining logic programs with description logics

    Benjamin N. Grosof;Ian Horrocks;Raphael Volz;Stefan Decker

  • An Approach to Using XML and a Rule-Based Content Language with an Agent Communication Language

    Benjamin N. Grosof;Yannis Labrou

  • Representing E-Commerce Rules Via Situated Courteous Logic Programs in RuleML

    Benjamin N. Grosof

  • Project Halo Update—Progress Toward Digital Aristotle

    David Gunning;Vinay K. Chaudhri;Peter Clark;Ken Barker

  • SweetJess: Translating DamlRuleML to Jess

    Mahesh Gandhe;Tim Finin;Benjamin Grosof

  • Generalizing prioritization

    Benjamin N. Grosof

  • Prioritized conflict handing for logic programs

    Benjamin N. Grosof

  • Conflict-handling assimilator service for exchange of rules with merging

    Hoi Yeung Chan;Benjamin N. Grosof

  • Dynamics of an Information-Filtering Economy

    Jeffrey O. Kephart;James E. Hanson;David W. Levine;Benjamin N. Grosof

  • Itinerant Agents for Mobile Computing

    David Chess;Benjamin Grosof;Colin Harrison;David Levine

  • A Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for Single-Item Stochastic Lot-Sizing Problems with Discrete Demand

    N. Halman;D. Klab;Jan M. Mostagir;J. Orlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Kifer
Michael Kifer Stony Brook University
Joan Feigenbaum
Joan Feigenbaum Yale University
Stefan Decker
Stefan Decker RWTH Aachen University
Ninghui Li
Ninghui Li Purdue University West Lafayette
Michael P. Wellman
Michael P. Wellman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ian Horrocks
Ian Horrocks University of Oxford
Stuart Russell
Stuart Russell University of California, Berkeley
Raphael Volz
Raphael Volz Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences
Tim Finin
Tim Finin University of Maryland, Baltimore County

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open new doors for students interested in Computer Science. Whether you're just starting your academic journey or seeking advanced knowledge, flexible online options are available for every stage.

For those looking to jumpstart a tech career, associates degrees online offer a fast and accessible way to learn computer science fundamentals. Many students also turn to fastest masters degree online programs to upskill quickly and remain competitive in the evolving tech industry.

If career advancement is your goal, it’s crucial to focus on masters degrees that are worth it. These programs align with in-demand skills and maximize your return on investment. Budget-conscious learners can also benefit from cheap online degrees fast options, which make quality education more affordable without sacrificing credibility.

Choose the pathway that best suits your career goals and financial considerations. With so many accredited online degrees available, you can find a tailored program that fits your needs and secures your future in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin N. Grosof

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles