World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Amanda J. Chamberlain

Amanda J. Chamberlain

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
35
Citations
8322
World Ranking
1683
National Ranking
96

Amanda J. Chamberlain publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda J. Chamberlain sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 123 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Amanda J. Chamberlain D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda J. Chamberlain sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

    B.J. Hayes;P.J. Bowman;A.J. Chamberlain;M.E. Goddard

  • Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle

    Hans D Daetwyler;Aurélien Capitan;Hubert Pausch;Paul Stothard

  • Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits and Accuracy of Genomic Prediction: Coat Colour, Milk-Fat Percentage, and Type in Holstein Cattle as Contrasting Model Traits

    Ben J. Hayes;Jennie E. Pryce;Amanda J Chamberlain;Phil J Bowman

  • Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for cattle stature identifies common genes that regulate body size in mammals.

    Aniek C. Bouwman;Hans D. Daetwyler;Amanda J. Chamberlain;Carla Hurtado Ponce

  • A multi-tissue atlas of regulatory variants in cattle

    Unknown

  • Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits

    I. M. MacLeod;I. M. MacLeod;P. J. Bowman;P. J. Bowman;C. J. Vander Jagt;M. Haile-Mariam

  • Functional annotations of three domestic animal genomes provide vital resources for comparative and agricultural research

    Colin Kern;Ying Wang;Xiaoqin Xu;Zhangyuan Pan

  • A validated genome wide association study to breed cattle adapted to an environment altered by climate change.

    Ben J. Hayes;Phil J. Bowman;Amanda J. Chamberlain;Keith Savin

  • Genetics of complex traits: prediction of phenotype, identification of causal polymorphisms and genetic architecture

    M. E. Goddard;K. E. Kemper;I. M. MacLeod;A. J. Chamberlain

  • A validated genome-wide association study in 2 dairy cattle breeds for milk production and fertility traits using variable length haplotypes.

    J.E. Pryce;S. Bolormaa;A.J. Chamberlain;P.J. Bowman

  • Quantifying the contribution of sequence variants with regulatory and evolutionary significance to 34 bovine complex traits

    Ruidong Xiang;Irene van den Berg;Iona M. MacLeod;Benjamin J. Hayes

  • Genome-wide fine-mapping identifies pleiotropic and functional variants that predict many traits across global cattle populations.

    Ruidong Xiang;Iona M. MacLeod;Hans D. Daetwyler;Gerben de Jong

  • Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions

    Kathryn E Kemper;Coralie M Reich;Philip J Bowman;Christy J vander Jagt

  • A genome map of divergent artificial selection between Bos taurus dairy cattle and Bos taurus beef cattle.

    Ben John. Hayes;A. J. Chamberlain;Sean Alexander. Maceachern;K. Savin

  • Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle.

    B. J. Hayes;A. J. Chamberlain;H. McPARTLAN;I. Macleod

  • Extensive variation between tissues in allele specific expression in an outbred mammal

    Amanda J. Chamberlain;Christy J. Vander Jagt;Benjamin J. Hayes;Benjamin J. Hayes;Majid Khansefid;Majid Khansefid

  • Overlap between eQTL and QTL associated with production traits and fertility in dairy cattle.

    I. van den Berg;B. J. Hayes;A. J. Chamberlain;M. E. Goddard

  • A catalogue of novel bovine long noncoding RNA across 18 tissues.

    Lambros T. Koufariotis;Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen;Amanda Chamberlain;Christy Vander Jagt

  • Targeted imputation of sequence variants and gene expression profiling identifies twelve candidate genes associated with lactation volume, composition and calving interval in dairy cattle.

    Lesley-Ann Raven;Benjamin G. Cocks;Kathryn E. Kemper;Amanda J. Chamberlain

  • Differentially Expressed Genes in Endometrium and Corpus Luteum of Holstein Cows Selected for High and Low Fertility Are Enriched for Sequence Variants Associated with Fertility

    Stephen G. Moore;Stephen G. Moore;Jennie E. Pryce;Ben J. Hayes;Amanda J. Chamberlain

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to Animal Science and Veterinary studies offers diverse opportunities beyond traditional roles. Many students are now turning to online programs to advance their expertise while balancing other commitments. For those interested in physical health and wellness, you can study exercise science online, gaining knowledge applicable to animal rehabilitation and performance.

Behavioral sciences also intersect with veterinary careers. Earning credentials through bcba accredited programs can prepare you to support animal behavior management techniques, a growing field in veterinary care.

Additionally, mental health is crucial in both human and animal care contexts. Pursuing degrees in psychology with programs such as the nasp accredited school psychology programs or apa accredited psyd programs online can expand your qualifications and open doors to varied interdisciplinary roles.

Considering these related online degrees can enhance your career pathway, providing a well-rounded skillset relevant to modern Animal Science and Veterinary professions.