World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
3604
World Ranking
10989
National Ranking
5730

Alexandria Meyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandria Meyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alexandria Meyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandria Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Considering ERP difference scores as individual difference measures: Issues with subtraction and alternative approaches.

    Alexandria Meyer;Matthew D. Lerner;Andres De Los Reyes;Robert D. Laird

  • The ERN is the ERN is the ERN? Convergent validity of error-related brain activity across different tasks

    Anja Riesel;Anna Weinberg;Tanja Endrass;Alexandria Meyer

  • Error-related negativity (ERN) and sustained threat: Conceptual framework and empirical evaluation in an adolescent sample.

    Anna Weinberg;Alexandria Meyer;Emily Hale-Rude;Greg Perlman

  • The Utility of Event-Related Potentials in Clinical Psychology

    Greg Hajcak;Julia Klawohn;Alexandria Meyer

  • The development of the error-related negativity (ERN) and its relationship with anxiety: Evidence from 8 to 13 year-olds.

    Alexandria Meyer;Anna Weinberg;Daniel N. Klein;Greg Hajcak

  • A biomarker of anxiety in children and adolescents: A review focusing on the error-related negativity (ERN) and anxiety across development.

    Alexandria Meyer

  • Differentiating Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: Evidence From Event-Related Brain Potentials

    Jennifer N Bress;Alexandria Meyer;Greg Hajcak

  • Enhanced error-related brain activity in children predicts the onset of anxiety disorders between the ages of 6 and 9

    Alexandria Meyer;Greg Hajcak;Dana C. Torpey-Newman;Autumn Kujawa

  • Reliability of the ERN across multiple tasks as a function of increasing errors

    Alexandria Meyer;Anja Riesel;Greg Hajcak Proudfit

  • The stability of the feedback negativity and its relationship with depression during childhood and adolescence.

    Jennifer N. Bress;Alexandria Meyer;Greg Hajcak Proudfit

  • Psychometric properties of the error‐related negativity in children and adolescents

    Alexandria Meyer;Jennifer N. Bress;Greg Hajcak Proudfit

  • Psychometrics and the neuroscience of individual differences: Internal consistency limits between-subjects effects.

    Greg Hajcak;Alexandria Meyer;Roman Kotov

  • Increased Error-Related Brain Activity in Six-Year-Old Children with Clinical Anxiety

    Alexandria Meyer;Greg Hajcak;Dana C. Torpey;Autumn Kujawa

  • Self-Reported and Observed Punitive Parenting Prospectively Predicts Increased Error-Related Brain Activity in Six-Year-Old Children

    Alexandria Meyer;Greg Hajcak Proudfit;Sara J. Bufferd;Autumn J. Kujawa

  • Methodological choices in event-related potential (ERP) research and their impact on internal consistency reliability and individual differences: An examination of the error-related negativity (ERN) and anxiety.

    Julia Klawohn;Alexandria Meyer;Anna Weinberg;Greg Hajcak

  • Reduced P300 in depression: Evidence from a flanker task and impact on ERN, CRN, and Pe.

    Julia Klawohn;Nicholas J. Santopetro;Alexandria Meyer;Greg Hajcak

  • A neural biomarker, the error-related negativity, predicts the first onset of generalized anxiety disorder in a large sample of adolescent females.

    Alexandria Meyer;Brady Nelson;Greg Perlman;Daniel N. Klein

  • Error-Specific Cognitive Control Alterations in Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    James F. Cavanagh;Alexandria Meyer;Greg Hajcak

  • Körperliche Aktivität und psychische Gesundheit

    Unknown

  • Developing Psychiatric Biomarkers: a Review Focusing on the Error-Related Negativity as a Biomarker for Anxiety

    Alexandria Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Greg Hajcak
Greg Hajcak Santa Clara University
Daniel N. Klein
Daniel N. Klein Stony Brook University
Autumn Kujawa
Autumn Kujawa Vanderbilt University
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Brady D. Nelson
Brady D. Nelson Stony Brook University
Anna Weinberg
Anna Weinberg McGill University
Gabrielle A. Carlson
Gabrielle A. Carlson Stony Brook University
Norman B. Schmidt
Norman B. Schmidt Florida State University
Evelyn J. Bromet
Evelyn J. Bromet Stony Brook University
Andres De Los Reyes
Andres De Los Reyes University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alexandria Meyer

Recently Published Articles