World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
24985
World Ranking
17962
National Ranking
1641

Adrian Grant publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Grant sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 227 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Adrian Grant D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Grant sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adrian Grant was affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom during their academic career. Their research included contributions to clinical neuropsychology, as evidenced by publications in the relevant scholarly venues.

Grant's recent research output includes a 2025 paper titled B - 65 Manual to Machine: Evaluating the Reliability of Artificial Intelligence for Systematic Review Data Extraction, published in the Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. This work reflects an involvement in the assessment of artificial intelligence applications within systematic review processes.

Throughout their career, Grant collaborated with various co-authors across different projects. Frequent collaborators included:

  • Fedora Biney
  • Helen Bliss
  • Gitendra Uswatte

Grant's publication record showed a connection primarily to the Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, which served as a notable venue for their research dissemination.

Best Publications

  • No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.

    Peter McCulloch;Douglas G Altman;W Bruce Campbell;David R Flum

  • Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Haleema Shakur;Ian Roberts;Bukola Fawole;Rizwana Chaudhri

  • Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low-trauma fractures in elderly people (Randomised Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D, RECORD): a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

    A M Grant;A Avenell;M K Campbell;A M McDonald

  • Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair

    Kirsty McCormack;Neil William Scott;P. M. Go;S. Ross

  • What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.

    Alison Mary McDonald;Rosemary C. Knight;Marion Kay Campbell;Vikki Entwistle

  • WHICH ANTICONVULSANT FOR WOMEN WITH ECLAMPSIA - EVIDENCE FROM THE COLLABORATIVE ECLAMPSIA TRIAL

    L Duley;G Carroli;J Belizan;L Gonzalez

  • Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

    Sue Ross;Adrian Grant;Carl Counsell;William Gillespie

  • UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

    DJ Field;C Davis;D Elbourne;A Grant

  • CLASP - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF PREECLAMPSIA AMONG 9364 PREGNANT-WOMEN

    G Beroyz;R Casale;A Farreiros;M Palermo

  • The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring

    Dermot MacDonald;Adrian Grant;Margaret Sheridan-Pereira;Peter Boylan

  • Randomised controlled trial of effect of fish-oil supplementation on pregnancy duration.

    S F Olsen;J D Sørensen;N J Secher;M Hedegaard

  • Randomized Comparison of Reduction and Fixation, Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty, and Total Hip Arthroplasty. Treatment of Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures in Healthy Older Patients

    Keating Jf;Grant A;Masson M;Scott Nw

  • Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study

    Marion Kay Campbell;Claire Snowdon;David Francis;Diana R. Elbourne

  • Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Multicentre Randomised Trial of Cervical Cerclage

    M C Macnaughton;I G Chalmers;V Dubowitz;P M Dunn

  • West Berkshire perineal management trial.

    J Sleep;A Grant;J Garcia;D Elbourne

  • Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.

    Kirsty McCormack;B. Wake;Juan Gregorio Gonzalez Perez;Cynthia Mary Fraser

  • Repair of Groin Hernia With Synthetic Mesh: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    A. Grant;P. Go;A. Fingerhut;A. Kingsnorth

  • Mesh compared with non‐mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    A. Grant

  • The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

    Jennifer Margaret Burr;Graham Mowatt;Rodolfo Andrés Hernández;Muhammad Ardul Rehman Siddiqui

  • Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    A. Grant

Frequent Co-Authors

Luke Vale
Luke Vale Newcastle University
Iain Chalmers
Iain Chalmers University of Oxford
Marion K Campbell
Marion K Campbell University of Aberdeen
Diana Elbourne
Diana Elbourne London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Richard W Morris
Richard W Morris University of Bristol
Ray Fitzpatrick
Ray Fitzpatrick University of Oxford
Alastair Gray
Alastair Gray University of Oxford
David W. Murray
David W. Murray University of Oxford
Mark Sculpher
Mark Sculpher University of York
Harald S. Hansen
Harald S. Hansen University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees and career paths can open doors to rewarding jobs beyond a traditional M.D. program. Many students consider nursing as a flexible option, with a variety of entry points. For those looking to get a jumpstart, check out the easiest rn program categories, which feature nursing schools with accessible admission requirements.

If you’re interested in administrative or non-clinical roles, earning a specialized certificate is also an option. Many pursue programs from online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, combining flexibility with federal financial aid opportunities.

Some aspiring nurses want to avoid standardized entrance exams. It’s possible to choose a nursing school that don't require teas or other pre-admission tests, making the application process easier for many students.

Lastly, those aiming for health management roles may benefit from a healthcare administration online degree. These programs can accelerate entry into healthcare leadership careers, with flexible schedules for working adults.

Best Scientists Citing Adrian Grant

Recently Published Articles