World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5556 5326 567 563 276 8427

Zhenxue Jiang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Zhenxue Jiang between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Zhenxue Jiang published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2019. 19 of the 286 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2019. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 46 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 7 publications
2005 2025

286 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Zhenxue Jiang: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 4
2009 2
2010 6
2011 2
2012 3
2013 5
2014 4
2015 17
2016 17
2017 36
2018 36
2019 46
2020 26
2021 34
2022 11
2023 16
2024 12
2025 7
Total 286
Download as CSV

Zhenxue Jiang publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zhenxue Jiang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 276 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155 276
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Zhenxue Jiang D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zhenxue Jiang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Zhenxue Jiang is affiliated with the China University of Petroleum, Beijing in China. Their research primarily focuses on engineering, with a significant emphasis on mechanics of materials and ocean engineering, as well as mechanical engineering and geology. The scientist's work spans into global and planetary change studies as well.

The main topics covered in their research include hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, coal properties and utilization, hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, geological studies and exploration, methane hydrates and related phenomena, and petroleum processing and analysis.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Xianglu Tang, Zhiye Gao, Lei Chen, Huan Miao, and Qun Luo.

Zhenxue Jiang has contributed regularly to specific publication venues, with numerous articles in Energy & Fuels, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Energies, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Marine and Petroleum Geology.

Selected recent papers by Zhenxue Jiang include:

  • Revisiting movable fluid space in tight fine-grained reservoirs: A case study from Shahejie shale in the Bohai Bay Basin, NE China (2021), Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
  • Comparative study of methane adsorption of Middle-Upper Ordovician marine shales in the western Ordos Basin, NW China: Insights into impacts of moisture on thermodynamics and kinetics of adsorption (2022), Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Enrichment of tight oil and its controlling factors in central and western China (2021), Petroleum Exploration and Development
  • A new and integrated imaging and compositional method to investigate the contributions of organic matter and inorganic minerals to the pore spaces of lacustrine shale in China (2021), Marine and Petroleum Geology
  • Natural fractures in carbonate-rich tight oil reservoirs from the Permian Lucaogou Formation, southern Junggar Basin, NW China: Insights from fluid inclusion microthermometry and isotopic geochemistry (2020), Marine and Petroleum Geology

Best Publications

  • The effect of the variation in material composition on the heterogeneous pore structure of high-maturity shale of the Silurian Longmaxi formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin, China

    Xianglu Tang;Zhenxue Jiang;Zhuo Li;Zhiye Gao

  • Mechanisms of shale gas adsorption: Evidence from thermodynamics and kinetics study of methane adsorption on shale

    Lei Chen;Lei Chen;Luo Zuo;Zhenxue Jiang;Shu Jiang;Shu Jiang

  • Heterogeneity of intergranular, intraparticle and organic pores in Longmaxi shale in Sichuan Basin, South China: Evidence from SEM digital images and fractal and multifractal geometries

    Pengfei Wang;Zhenxue Jiang;Wenming Ji;Chen Zhang

  • Geological controls and estimation algorithms of lacustrine shale gas adsorption capacity: A case study of the Triassic strata in the southeastern Ordos Basin, China

    Wenming Ji;Yan Song;Zhenxue Jiang;Xiangzeng Wang

  • Pore structure characterization for the Longmaxi and Niutitang shales in the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China: Evidence from focused ion beam–He ion microscopy, nano-computerized tomography and gas adsorption analysis

    Pengfei Wang;Zhenxue Jiang;Lei Chen;Lishi Yin

  • Heterogeneous nanoporosity of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan Basin using the QEMSCAN, FIB-SEM, and nano-CT methods

    Xianglu Tang;Xianglu Tang;Zhenxue Jiang;Shu Jiang;Zhuo Li

  • Analysis of Lower Cambrian shale gas composition, source and accumulation pattern in different tectonic backgrounds: A case study of Weiyuan Block in the Upper Yangtze region and Xiuwu Basin in the Lower Yangtze region

    Kun Zhang;Chengzao Jia;Yan Song;Shu Jiang;Shu Jiang;Shu Jiang

  • Estimation of marine shale methane adsorption capacity based on experimental investigations of Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation in the Upper Yangtze Platform, south China

    Wenming Ji;Yan Song;Zhenxue Jiang;Lei Chen

  • Pore structure characterization for organic-rich Lower Silurian shale in the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China: A possible mechanism for pore development

    Lei Chen;Zhenxue Jiang;Keyu Liu;Keyu Liu;Jingqiang Tan

  • Progress and development trend of unconventional oil and gas geological research

    Yan Song;Yan Song;Zhuo Li;Zhenxue Jiang;Qun Luo

  • Fractal characteristics of nano-pores in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shales from the Upper Yangtze Platform, south China

    Wenming Ji;Wenming Ji;Yan Song;Zhenxue Jiang;Mianmo Meng

  • Pore structure of transitional shales in the Ordos Basin, NW China: Effects of composition on gas storage capacity

    Fengyang Xiong;Fengyang Xiong;Zhenxue Jiang;Peng Li;Xiangzeng Wang

  • Effect of lithofacies on gas storage capacity of marine and continental shales in the Sichuan Basin, China

    Lei Chen;Zhenxue Jiang;Keyu Liu;Pengfei Wang

  • Differential impact of clay minerals and organic matter on pore structure and its fractal characteristics of marine and continental shales in China

    Jiaqi Chang;Xiaodong Fan;Zhenxue Jiang;Xingmeng Wang

  • Effect of Water Imbibition on Shale Permeability and Its Influence on Gas Production

    Yinghao Shen;Yinghao Shen;Hongkui Ge;Mianmo Meng;Zhenxue Jiang

  • Mechanism of shale gas occurrence: Insights from comparative study on pore structures of marine and lacustrine shales

    Lei Chen;Lei Chen;Zhenxue Jiang;Qingxin Liu;Shu Jiang

  • A multiscale comprehensive study on pore structure of tight sandstone reservoir realized by nuclear magnetic resonance, high pressure mercury injection and constant-rate mercury injection penetration test

    Fan Zhang;Zhenxue Jiang;Wei Sun;Yaohua Li

  • A review of shale wettability characterization using spontaneous imbibition experiments

    Zhiye Gao;Yupeng Fan;Qinhong Hu;Zhenxue Jiang

  • Reservoir characteristics and their effects on hydrocarbon accumulation in lacustrine turbidites in the Jiyang Super-depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China

    Dongxia Chen;Dongxia Chen;Xiongqi Pang;Zhenxue Jiang;Jianhui Zeng

  • Controlling factors of marine shale gas differential enrichment in southern China

    Zhenxue Jiang;Yan Song;Xianglu Tang;Zhuo Li

  • Lithofacies classification and its effect on pore structure of the Cambrian marine shale in the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China: Evidence from FE-SEM and gas adsorption analysis

    Pengfei Wang;Zhenxue Jiang;Lishi Yin;Lei Chen

  • Investigation of variation in shale gas adsorption capacity with burial depth: Insights from the adsorption potential theory

    Hexin Huang;Hexin Huang;Hexin Huang;Rongxi Li;Zhenxue Jiang;Jian Li

  • Lithofacies characteristics and its effect on gas storage of the Silurian Longmaxi marine shale in the southeast Sichuan Basin, China

    Xianglu Tang;Xianglu Tang;Zhenxue Jiang;Hexin Huang;Shu Jiang

Frequent Co-Authors

Shu Jiang
Shu Jiang China University of Geosciences
Xiongqi Pang
Xiongqi Pang China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Keyu Liu
Keyu Liu China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Qinhong Hu
Qinhong Hu The University of Texas at Arlington
Mohamad Reza Soltanian
Mohamad Reza Soltanian University of Cincinnati
Maowen Li
Maowen Li Geological Survey of Canada
Haijun Yang
Haijun Yang China National Petroleum Corporation (China)
Ralf Littke
Ralf Littke RWTH Aachen University
Xiangfang Li
Xiangfang Li China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Zhijun Jin
Zhijun Jin Sinopec (China)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in education and leadership within environmental fields, exploring the edd no dissertation programs can provide advanced skills without the lengthy dissertation commitment. This option is ideal for professionals looking to enhance their expertise efficiently.

Students aiming to advance their educational credentials might consider transitioning through the best eds to edd programs. These pathways support seamless progression from a master's-level EdS to a doctoral degree, strengthening leadership capabilities in educational or environmental settings.

For those interested in social aspects of environmental work, affordable options such as the cheapest dsw program offer a cost-effective way to gain expertise in social work with a focus on community and environmental well-being.

Additionally, individuals seeking a broad-based education might find value in some of the cheap online general studies degree programs. These flexible degrees allow students to tailor their studies around environmental science themes combined with other relevant disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Zhenxue Jiang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles