World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
70
Citations
22711
World Ranking
20064
National Ranking
9991

William J. Weiner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Weiner sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 309 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Weiner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Weiner sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William J. Weiner was affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their academic contributions included work tied to this institution during their career.

No recorded publications or specific research topics are available in the data provided, and no details on co-authors, publication venues, books, or main fields and subfields of study are listed.

There is also no information on awards or distinctions earned by William J. Weiner throughout their professional tenure.

The available data indicates that the scientist is deceased, and all descriptions reflect the past tense accordingly.

Best Publications

  • Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results.

    Christopher G. Goetz;Barbara C. Tilley;Stephanie R. Shaftman;Glenn T. Stebbins

  • Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration.

    Melissa J. Armstrong;Irene Litvan;Anthony E. Lang;Thomas H. Bak

  • Variable expression of Parkinson's disease A base‐line analysis of the DAT ATOP cohort

    Joseph Jankovic;Michael P McDermott;Jonathan T Carter;Susan A Gauthier

  • Non-recognition of depression and other non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.

    L.M Shulman;R.L Taback;A.A Rabinstein;W.J Weiner

  • Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a 4-year randomized controlled trial.

    Robert G Holloway;Ira Shoulson;Stanley Fahn;Karl Kieburtz

  • Practice Parameter: Treatment of Parkinson Disease With Motor Fluctuations and Dyskinesia (An Evidence-Based Review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    R. Pahwa;S. A. Factor;K. E. Lyons;William G. Ondo

  • Practice Parameter: Evaluation and treatment of depression, psychosis, and dementia in Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    D Aarsland;M Emre;A Lees;W Poewe

  • The Clinically Important Difference on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

    Lisa M. Shulman;Ann L. Gruber-Baldini;Karen E. Anderson;Paul S. Fishman

  • Practice parameter: Initiation of treatment for Parkinson’s disease: An evidence-based review: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    J. M. Miyasaki;W. Martin;O. Suchowersky;W. J. Weiner

  • Comorbidity of the nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

    Lisa M. Shulman;Robin Leifert Taback;Judy Bean;William J. Weiner

  • Practice parameter: therapies for essential tremor: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

    T. A. Zesiewicz;T. A. Zesiewicz;R. Elble;E. D. Louis;R. A. Hauser

  • Randomized Clinical Trial of 3 Types of Physical Exercise for Patients With Parkinson Disease

    Lisa M. Shulman;Leslie I. Katzel;Frederick M. Ivey;John D. Sorkin

  • Evidence-based guideline update: Treatment of essential tremor Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    Theresa A. Zesiewicz;Rodger J. Elble;E. D. Louis;Gary S. Gronseth

  • Practice Parameter: Diagnosis and prognosis of new onset Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    O. Suchowersky;S. Reich;J. Perlmutter;T. Zesiewicz

  • Practice Parameter: Treatment of nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson disease Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    Theresa A. Zesiewicz;Kelly L. Sullivan;I. Arnulf;K. R. Chaudhuri

  • The evolution of disability in Parkinson disease.

    Lisa M. Shulman;Ann L. Gruber-Baldini;Karen E. Anderson;Christopher G. Vaughan

  • Sleep disruption in the course of chronic levodopa therapy: an early feature of the levodopa psychosis.

    Paul A. Nausieda;William J. Weiner;Linda R. Kaplan;Steven Weber

  • Practice Parameter: Neuroprotective strategies and alternative therapies for Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    O. Suchowersky;G. Gronseth;J. Perlmutter;S. Reich

  • A randomized clinical trial of coenzyme Q10 and GPI-1485 in early Parkinson disease

    Karl Kieburtz;Bernard Ravina;Bernard Ravina;Wendy R. Galpern;Barbara Tilley

  • Heterozygosity for a mutation in the parkin gene leads to later onset Parkinson disease

    Tatiana Foroud;S. K. Uniacke;L. Liu;Nathan D Pankratz

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen G. Reich
Stephen G. Reich University of Maryland, Baltimore
Christopher G. Goetz
Christopher G. Goetz Rush University Medical Center
Oksana Suchowersky
Oksana Suchowersky University of Alberta
Gary S. Gronseth
Gary S. Gronseth University of Kansas
Anthony E. Lang
Anthony E. Lang University of Toronto
William C. Koller
William C. Koller University of Miami
Stewart A. Factor
Stewart A. Factor Emory University
Joseph Jankovic
Joseph Jankovic Baylor College of Medicine
Rodger J. Elble
Rodger J. Elble Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Caroline M. Tanner
Caroline M. Tanner University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine can open up many rewarding and flexible study paths online. If you are already a registered nurse, advancing your qualifications may be easier than you think. For example, asn to nurse practitioner programs help nurses transition quickly to advanced roles. These bridge programs are ideal for those with an associate degree who aspire to become nurse practitioners.

For students interested in health and wellness, earning an online degree nutrition provides a solid foundation for careers in dietetics, health coaching, and wellness education. These programs often offer the choice to specialize further.

Administration is also critical in healthcare. A cahme accredited online mha can prepare you for leadership roles by focusing on healthcare management, policy, and ethics.

Many working nurses seek flexible pathways to enhance their credentials. Some rn to bsn programs without clinicals are designed for licensed nurses who need an entirely online curriculum without hands-on requirements, making advancement more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Weiner

Recently Published Articles