World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
22787
World Ranking
3339
National Ranking
1546

Rodger J. Elble publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodger J. Elble sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 165 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Rodger J. Elble D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodger J. Elble sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rodger J. Elble is affiliated with Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily addresses neurological disorders and treatments, with a significant focus on Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, and neuroscience and neural engineering.

The main fields of study for Elble include Medicine and Neuroscience, with subfields such as Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rheumatology, Biomedical Engineering, and Cognitive Neuroscience. The scope of their work covers a wide range of topics including glycogen storage diseases and myoclonus, botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders, and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

Elble has published in several journals, with frequent contributions to Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements, Neurology, Movement Disorders, Clinical Neurophysiology, and the Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

Notable recent papers include:

  • The clinical and electrophysiological investigation of tremor, 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Evaluation of movement and brain activity, 2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Tremor rating scales and laboratory tools for assessing tremor, 2022, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Exploring Interrater Disagreement on Essential Tremor Using a Standardized Tremor Elements Assessment, 2021, Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
  • A Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of CX-8998 in Essential Tremor, 2021, Movement Disorders

Frequent coauthors with Elble include Ludy C. Shih, Hyder A. Jinnah, William G. Ondo, Kelly E. Lyons, and Margaret E. Gerbasi, reflecting a collaborative engagement in their areas of research.

Best Publications

  • Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results.

    Christopher G. Goetz;Barbara C. Tilley;Stephanie R. Shaftman;Glenn T. Stebbins

  • Consensus Statement on the classification of tremors. from the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

    Kailash P Bhatia;Peter Bain;Nin Bajaj;Rodger J Elble

  • Estrogen for Alzheimer’s disease in women Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Victor W. Henderson;A. Paganini-Hill;B. L. Miller;R. J. Elble

  • Animal Models of Action Tremor

    Rodger J. Elble

  • Treatment of patients with essential tremor

    Günther Deuschl;Jan Raethjen;Helge Hellriegel;Rodger Elble;Rodger Elble

  • Practice parameter: therapies for essential tremor: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

    T. A. Zesiewicz;T. A. Zesiewicz;R. Elble;E. D. Louis;R. A. Hauser

  • Evidence-based guideline update: Treatment of essential tremor Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    Theresa A. Zesiewicz;Rodger J. Elble;E. D. Louis;Gary S. Gronseth

  • Stride-dependent changes in gait of older people.

    R. J. Elble;S. Sienko Thomas;C. Higgins;J. Colliver

  • Central mechanisms of tremor.

    Rodger J. Elble

  • Physiologic and essential tremor

    Rodger J. Elble

  • Motor-unit activity responsible for 8- to 12-Hz component of human physiological finger tremor.

    Unknown

  • Assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability of the Fahn–Tolosa–Marin Tremor Rating Scale in essential tremor

    Mark A. Stacy;Rodger J. Elble;William G. Ondo;Shu Chen Wu

  • Essential Tremor--Neurodegenerative or Nondegenerative Disease Towards a Working Definition of ET

    Günther Deuschl;Rodger Elble

  • A randomized clinical trial of coenzyme Q10 and GPI-1485 in early Parkinson disease

    Karl Kieburtz;Bernard Ravina;Bernard Ravina;Wendy R. Galpern;Barbara Tilley

  • The initiation of normal walking

    Rodger J. Elble;Charles Moody;Keith Leffler;Raj Sinha

  • Reliability of a new scale for essential tremor

    Rodger Elble;Cynthia Comella;Stanley Fahn;Mark Hallett

  • Criteria for the diagnosis of essential tremor.

    P Bain;M Brin;G Deuschl;R Elble

  • The pathophysiology of essential tremor.

    G Deuschl;R J Elble

  • Tremor amplitude is logarithmically related to 4- and 5-point tremor rating scales

    Rodger J. Elble;Seth L. Pullman;Joseph Y. Matsumoto;Jan Raethjen

  • Diagnostic criteria for essential tremor and differential diagnosis.

    Elble Rj

  • Topiramate in essential tremor: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    William G. Ondo;J. Jankovic;G. S. Connor;R. Pahwa

  • Pentagon copying is more impaired in dementia with Lewy bodies than in Alzheimer's disease

    T A Ala;L F Hughes;G A Kyrouac;M W Ghobrial

  • Essential tremor frequency decreases with time.

    Rodger J. Elble

  • Testing objective measures of motor impairment in early Parkinson's disease: Feasibility study of an at-home testing device.

    Christopher G. Goetz;Glenn T. Stebbins;David Wolff;William DeLeeuw

  • Genomewide scans in North American families reveal genetic linkage of essential tremor to a region on chromosome 6p23.

    Alexey Shatunov;Nyamkhishig Sambuughin;Joseph Jankovic;Rodger Elble

Frequent Co-Authors

Günther Deuschl
Günther Deuschl Kiel University
Rajesh Pahwa
Rajesh Pahwa University of Kansas
Mark Hallett
Mark Hallett National Institutes of Health
Kelly E. Lyons
Kelly E. Lyons University of Kansas
Joseph Jankovic
Joseph Jankovic Baylor College of Medicine
Elan D. Louis
Elan D. Louis The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
William G. Ondo
William G. Ondo Cornell University
Larry F. Hughes
Larry F. Hughes Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Jan Raethjen
Jan Raethjen Kiel University
Kapil D. Sethi
Kapil D. Sethi Augusta University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens diverse career avenues. Many students explore related fields such as psychology, therapy, or social work to broaden their skills and job opportunities. An increasing number of universities now offer flexible cheap online psychology degree programs, making it more accessible to pursue an education while balancing other commitments.

Those interested in providing mental health support might consider enrolling in the best online mft programs or a masters in psychology online to gain a deeper understanding of human behavior. These pathways can lead to roles in therapy, counseling, or research.

Social work is another career closely tied to neuroscience and psychology. For students seeking an accessible entry into the field, there are now online msw programs designed to be flexible and easier to get into. Exploring these online degrees can help you discover new interests and shape a rewarding career that leverages your neuroscience background.

Best Scientists Citing Rodger J. Elble

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles