World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
7826
World Ranking
4078
National Ranking
1422

Wayne A. Hubert publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne A. Hubert sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 248 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Wayne A. Hubert D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wayne A. Hubert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wayne A. Hubert is a researcher affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States. Their work primarily addresses topics related to energy, environmental science, and economics, econometrics, and finance.

The scientist's recent research publication is titled The climate change crisis: A call for action by Past Presidents of the American Fisheries Society, published in 2025 in the journal Fisheries.

Wayne A. Hubert frequently collaborates with several coauthors including:

  • Scott A. Bonar
  • Charles C. Coutant
  • Ron Essig
  • Mary C. Fabrizio
  • William L. Fisher

Their published works often appear in the journal Fisheries.

Their research fields include:

  • Energy
  • Environmental Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

In the subfields of study, their work spans:

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Economics and Econometrics

Wayne A. Hubert focuses primarily on the following research topics:

  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics

Best Publications

  • Fish Assemblages and Habitat Gradients in a Rocky Mountain–Great Plains Stream: Biotic Zonation and Additive Patterns of Community Change

    Frank J. Rahel;Wayne A. Hubert

  • Standard methods for sampling North American freshwater fishes

    Scott A. Bonar;Wayne A. Hubert;David W. Willis

  • A Primer on Winter, Ice, and Fish: What Fisheries Biologists Should Know about Winter Ice Processes and Stream-Dwelling Fish

    Richard S. Brown;Wayne A. Hubert;Steven F. Daly

  • Yearling Greater Sage-Grouse Response to Energy Development in Wyoming

    Matthew J. Holloran;Rusty C. Kaiser;Wayne A. Hubert

  • A hypothesis about factors that affect maximum summer stream temperatures across montane landscapes

    Daniel J. Isaak;Wayne A. Hubert

  • Single-Pass Electrofishing Predicts Trout Abundance in Mountain Streams with Sparse Habitat

    Carter G. Kruse;Wayne A. Hubert;Frank J. Rahel

  • Effort Needed to Estimate Species Richness in Small Streams on the Great Plains in Wyoming

    Tim M. Patton;Wayne A. Hubert;Frank J. Rahel;Kenneth G. Gerow

  • Standard Sampling of Inland Fish: Benefits, Challenges, and a Call for Action

    Scott A. Bonar;Wayne A. Hubert

  • Winter Stream Conditions and Use of Habitat by Brook Trout in High-Elevation Wyoming Streams

    Ian M. Chisholm;Wayne A. Hubert;Thomas A. Wesche

  • Segregation of resident trout in streams as predicted by three habitat dimensions

    Michael A. Bozek;Wayne A. Hubert

  • Expulsion of Dummy Transmitters by Rainbow Trout

    Ian M. Chisholm;Wayne A. Hubert

  • Using Historical Data to Assess Changes in Wyoming’s Fish Fauna

    Timothy M. Patton;Frank J. Rahel;Wayne A. Hubert

  • Physiological responses of juvenile rainbow trout to fasting and swimming activity: Effects on body composition and condition indices

    Darin G. Simpkins;Wayne A. Hubert;Carlos Martinez Del Rio;Daniel C. Rule

  • Modified Habitat Suitability Index Model for Brown Trout in Southeastern Wyoming

    Thomas A. Wesche;Chris M. Goertler;Wayne A. Hubert

  • Selection of measures of substrate composition to estimate survival to emergence of salmonids and to detect changes in stream substrates

    Michael K. Young;Wayne A. Hubert;Thomas A. Wesche

  • Geomorphic Influences on the Distribution of Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout in the Absaroka Mountains, Wyoming

    Carter G. Kruse;Wayne A. Hubert;Frank J. Rahel

  • Relations of Geomorphology to Stream Habitat and Trout Standing Stock in Small Rocky Mountain Streams

    Robert P. Lanka;Wayne A. Hubert;Thomas A. Wesche

  • An introduced and a native vertebrate hybridize to form a genetic bridge to a second native species.

    David B. McDonald;Thomas L. Parchman;Michael R. Bower;Wayne A. Hubert

  • Status of Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout in Wyoming Waters

    Carter G. Kruse;Wayne A. Hubert;Frank J. Rahel

  • Snorkeling as an Alternative to Depletion Electrofishing for Estimating Abundance and Length-Class Frequencies of Trout in Small Streams

    Scott A. Mullner;Wayne A. Hubert;Thomas A. Wesche

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank J. Rahel
Frank J. Rahel University of Wyoming
Stanley H. Anderson
Stanley H. Anderson University of Wyoming
Daniel J. Isaak
Daniel J. Isaak US Forest Service
Daniel C. Rule
Daniel C. Rule University of Wyoming
Michael K. Young
Michael K. Young US Forest Service
Carlos Martínez del Rio
Carlos Martínez del Rio University of Wyoming
Thomas L. Parchman
Thomas L. Parchman University of Nevada Reno
Ian J. Winfield
Ian J. Winfield Lancaster University
Jan Kubečka
Jan Kubečka Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, there are many online pathways to build a specialized career or pivot into impactful roles in research, education, and environmental policy. Many professionals start with a healthcare or science background and later seek advanced degrees that blend ecological knowledge with applied skills.

Some choose nursing as a route, utilizing adn to np programs to bridge their associate qualifications with advanced practice positions. Others may come from non-nursing backgrounds and explore msn direct entry programs online to quickly enter the healthcare field—opening careers closely linked to public health, conservation, and ecological impacts.

When comparing degree options, factors like curriculum focus, program flexibility, and tuition play a big role. For example, a useful comparison is capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn, especially for those interested in integrated science knowledge, as these programs can serve as stepping stones to broader roles in research or ecological advocacy.

Finally, if you’re seeking an efficient academic journey, consider rn to bsn to msn online programs for affordable and streamlined advancement. These programs can empower you to connect your passion for science with real-world influence, whether in the lab, field, or classroom.

Best Scientists Citing Wayne A. Hubert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles