World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stanley H. Anderson

Stanley H. Anderson

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
5392
World Ranking
6870
National Ranking
2314

Stanley H. Anderson publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley H. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 156 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stanley H. Anderson D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley H. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA)

Overview

Stanley H. Anderson was affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States. Their research career was recognized by the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA), which awarded them the distinction of Fellow in 2005.

Throughout their professional tenure, Stanley H. Anderson contributed to the academic community primarily within the field of soil science, as indicated by their fellowship recognition.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or predominant publication venues associated with their name in the available data. Similarly, there is no information on book publications, specific subfields of study, or detailed topics of work within their research scope.

The absence of detailed publication records, co-authorship patterns, and topic-specific outputs suggests a focus that may not be extensively documented in the source data or a specialization within practical or institutional contexts rather than widely published research.

Best Publications

  • HABITAT SELECTION OF BREEDING BIRDS IN AN EAST TENNESSEE DECIDUOUS FOREST

    Stanley H. Anderson;Herman H. Shugart

  • Foraging guilds of North American birds

    Richard M. De Graaf;Nancy G. Tilghman;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Estimation of Small‐Mammal Population Size

    George E. Menkens;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Influence of prerelease experience on reintroduced black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes)

    Dean E Biggins;Astrid Vargas;Jerry L Godbey;Stanley H Anderson

  • Potential gas development impacts on sage grouse nest initiation and movement

    Alison G. Lyon;Stanley H. Anderson

  • GREATER SAGE‐GROUSE NESTING HABITAT SELECTION AND SUCCESS IN WYOMING

    Matthew J. Holloran;Brian J. Heath;Alison G. Lyon;Steven J. Slater

  • Multiscale Associations between Cavity-Nesting Birds and Features of Wyoming Streamside Woodlands

    Kevin J. Gutzwiller;Stanley H. Anderson

  • SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NESTS IN RELATIVELY CONTIGUOUS SAGEBRUSH HABITATS

    Matthew J. Holloran;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Does Repeated Human Intrusion Cause Cumulative Declines in Avian Richness and Abundance

    Samuel K. Riffell;Kevin J. Gutzwiller;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Passerine response to roads associated with natural gas extraction in a sagebrush steppe habitat

    Franz Ingelfinger;Stanley Anderson

  • Seasonal changes in Yuma clapper rail vocalization rate and habitat use

    Courtney J. Conway;William R. Eddleman;Stanley H. Anderson;Louis R. Hanebury

  • The Effect of Suburban and Agricultural Development on the Activity Patterns of Coyotes (Canis latrans)

    Nathan McCLENNEN;Rachel R. Wigglesworth;Stanley H. Anderson;Douglas G. Wachob

  • Ineffectiveness of Swareflex Reflectors at Reducing Deer-Vehicle Collisions

    AF Reeve;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Bird tolerance to human intrusion in Wyoming Montane Forests

    Kevin J. Gutzwiller;Heidi A. Marcum;Henry B. Harvey;James D. Roth

  • Juvenile survival and population regulation of the Jackson elk herd

    Bruce L. Smith;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Interception of moving organisms: influences of patch shape, size, and orientation on community structure

    Kevin J. Gutzwiller;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Effects of human intrusion on song occurrence and singing consistency in subalpine birds

    Kevin J. Gutzwiller;Richard T. Wiedenmann;Krista L. Clements;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Conservation Biology and the Black-Footed Ferret

    E. Tom Thorne;Michael A. Bogan;Stanley H. Anderson

  • The Importance of Beaver to Wetland Habitats and Waterfowl in Wyoming

    Mark C. McKinstry;Paul Caffrey;Stanley H. Anderson

  • Effect of transmission-line corridors on bird populations

    Stanley H. Anderson;Kathleen Mann;Herman H. Shugart

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne A. Hubert
Wayne A. Hubert University of Wyoming
Elizabeth S. Williams
Elizabeth S. Williams University of Wyoming
Dean E. Biggins
Dean E. Biggins United States Geological Survey
Courtney J. Conway
Courtney J. Conway University of Idaho
John R. Squires
John R. Squires US Forest Service
Fritz L. Knopf
Fritz L. Knopf United States Geological Survey
James D. Roth
James D. Roth University of Manitoba
Herman H. Shugart
Herman H. Shugart University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in Ecology and Evolution, there are several related online degree options and career pathways to consider. Graduates in these fields often explore interdisciplinary roles that combine science, research, communication, and education.

For those interested in broader historical context alongside science, a masters in history can help you develop analytical skills important for research and environmental policy roles.

Jobs in scientific libraries, archives, or information management may require an MLIS degree. Prospective students should investigate the average cost of mlis degree us to ensure this pathway fits their budget and career plans.

For those interested in communication and support roles, such as Speech-Language Pathology, many flexible and asha approved slp programs are available online and can lead to rewarding careers working with diverse populations.

Finally, if your background is not in Speech-Language Pathology, slp bridge programs allow non-SLP majors to transition into the field without starting over, broadening your career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley H. Anderson

Recently Published Articles