World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Timothy J. Garrett

Timothy J. Garrett

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
7756
World Ranking
6109
National Ranking
2212

Timothy J. Garrett publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy J. Garrett sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 200 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Timothy J. Garrett D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy J. Garrett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy J. Garrett is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and specializes in research within Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their work primarily focuses on several interconnected areas involving atmospheric and environmental processes.

Garrett's research covers subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Environmental Engineering, and Ocean Engineering. The main topics addressed in their publications include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Precipitation Measurement and Analysis, Global Energy and Sustainability Research, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Cryospheric studies and observations, and Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies.

Some of the recent published works by Garrett include:

  • Past world economic production constrains current energy demands: Persistent scaling with implications for economic growth and climate change mitigation, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Arctic observations and numerical simulations of surface wind effects on Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera measurements, 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (co-authored by Kyle E. Fitch)
  • Graupel Precipitating From Thin Arctic Clouds With Liquid Water Paths Less Than 50 g m −2, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters (co-authored by Kyle E. Fitch)
  • Estimates of economic and environmental damages from tipping points cannot be reconciled with the scientific literature, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (co-authored by Steve Keen)
  • Mass and density of individual frozen hydrometeors, 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (co-authored by Karlie N. Rees)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Garrett include:

  • Eric R. Pardyjak
  • Matheus R. Grasselli
  • Ahmad Talaei
  • Karlie N. Rees
  • Stephen P. Keen

Garrett frequently publishes in several scientific venues, with notable recurring appearances in:

  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Physics of Fluids
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Short-lived pollutants in the Arctic: their climate impact and possible mitigation strategies

    P. K. Quinn;T. S. Bates;E. Baum;N. Doubleday

  • Increased Arctic cloud longwave emissivity associated with pollution from mid-latitudes

    Timothy J. Garrett;Chuanfeng Zhao

  • FIRE Arctic Clouds Experiment

    J. A. Curry;P. V. Hobbs;M. D. King;D. A. Randall

  • Effects of Arctic haze on surface cloud radiative forcing

    Chuanfeng Zhao;Timothy J. Garrett

  • Emissions from Ships with respect to Their Effects on Clouds

    Peter V. Hobbs;Timothy J. Garrett;Ronald J. Ferek;Scott R. Strader

  • Airborne instruments to measure atmospheric aerosol particles, clouds and radiation: A cook's tour of mature and emerging technology

    D. Baumgardner;J.L. Brenguier;A. Bucholtz;H. Coe

  • Fall speed measurement and high-resolution multi-angle photography of hydrometeors in free fall

    T. J. Garrett;C. Fallgatter;K. Shkurko;D. Howlett

  • Effects of varying aerosol regimes on low-level Arctic stratus

    T. J. Garrett;C. Zhao;X. Dong;X. Dong;G. G. Mace

  • Drizzle Suppression in Ship Tracks.

    Ronald J. Ferek;Ronald J. Ferek;Timothy Garrett;Peter V. Hobbs;Scott Strader

  • Aerosol Effects on Cloud Emissivity and Surface Longwave Heating in the Arctic

    Timothy J. Garrett;Lawrence F. Radke;Peter V. Hobbs

  • The role of scavenging in the seasonal transport of black carbon and sulfate to the Arctic

    Timothy J. Garrett;Sara Brattström;Sangeeta Sharma;Douglas E. J. Worthy

  • Evidence That Nitric Acid Increases Relative Humidity in Low-Temperature Cirrus Clouds

    R. S. Gao;P. J. Popp;D. W. Fahey;T. P. Marcy

  • Assessing the relative contributions of transport efficiency and scavenging to seasonal variability in Arctic aerosol.

    Timothy J. Garrett;Chuanfeng Zhao;Chuanfeng Zhao;Paul C. Novelli

  • Nephelometer Measurements of the Asymmetry Parameter, Volume Extinction Coefficient, and Backscatter Ratio in Arctic Clouds

    H. Gerber;Y. Takano;Timothy J. Garrett;Peter V. Hobbs

  • Small, highly reflective ice crystals in low-latitude cirrus

    T. J. Garrett;H. Gerber;D. G. Baumgardner;Cynthia Twohy

  • Orientations and aspect ratios of falling snow

    Timothy J. Garrett;Sandra E. Yuter;Cale Fallgatter;Konstantin Shkurko

  • Observed influence of riming, temperature, and turbulence on the fallspeed of solid precipitation

    Timothy J. Garrett;Sandra E. Yuter

  • The impact of ship-produced aerosols on the microstructure and albedo of warm marine stratocumulus clouds: A test of MAST hypotheses 1i and 1ii

    Philip A. Durkee;K. J. Noone;R. J. Ferek;R. J. Ferek;D. W. Johnson

  • Toward Comprehensive Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Annotation Using FluoroMatch Software and Intelligent High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry Acquisition

    Jeremy P. Koelmel;Matthew K. Paige;Juan J. Aristizabal-Henao;Nicole M. Robey

  • Evolution of a Florida Cirrus Anvil

    T. J. Garrett;B. C. Navarro;C. H. Twohy;E. J. Jensen

  • Aerosol climate effects and air quality impacts from 1980 to 2030

    Surabi Menon;Nadine Unger;Nadine Unger;Dorothy Koch;Dorothy Koch;Jennifer Francis

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter V. Hobbs
Peter V. Hobbs University of Washington
Darrel Baumgardner
Darrel Baumgardner National Autonomous University of Mexico
Elliot M. Weinstock
Elliot M. Weinstock Harvard University
Lynn M. Russell
Lynn M. Russell University of California, San Diego
Andrew J. Heymsfield
Andrew J. Heymsfield National Center for Atmospheric Research
Andreas Stohl
Andreas Stohl University of Vienna
Steven K. Krueger
Steven K. Krueger University of Utah
James G. Hudson
James G. Hudson Desert Research Institute
Cynthia H. Twohy
Cynthia H. Twohy Northwest Research Associates
Brian A. Ridley
Brian A. Ridley National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of career paths that often benefit from advanced education. Many professionals consider online programs to balance work and study efficiently. For educators looking to advance, online ed d programs without dissertation offer a streamlined route to doctoral credentials, focusing more on practical application than extensive research.

Those aiming for leadership roles in education can explore the best eds to edd programs, which provide a clear educational progression from master's to doctorate. This pathway is beneficial for environmental educators or administrators seeking specialized skills.

For professionals interested in social impact areas intersecting with environmental justice, affordable options like dsw programs can be a strategic choice. These programs deliver advanced training in social work, integrating well with environmental advocacy careers.

Additionally, students in need of a flexible and cost-effective degree might find value in a budget friendly online general studies degree, which allows for a broad interdisciplinary approach, complementing Environmental Sciences with courses in policy, management, or communications.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy J. Garrett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles