World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4569
World Ranking
10887
National Ranking
1059

Tim Rees publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Rees sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tim Rees D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Rees sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The Great British Medalists Project: A Review of Current Knowledge on the Development of the World's Best Sporting Talent.

    Tim Rees;Lew Hardy;Arne Güllich;Bruce Abernethy

  • An Investigation of the Social Support Experiences of High-Level Sports Performers

    Tim Rees;Lew Hardy

  • A Social Identity Approach to Sport Psychology: Principles, Practice, and Prospects.

    Tim Rees;Tim Rees;S. Alexander Haslam;Pete Coffee;David Lavallee

  • Matching social support with stressors: Effects on factors underlying performance in tennis.

    Tim Rees;Lew Hardy

  • The PASS-Q: The Perceived Available Support in Sport Questionnaire

    Paul Freeman;Pete Coffee;Tim Rees

  • Attribution in sport psychology: seeking congruence between theory, research and practice

    Tim Rees;David K. Ingledew;Lew Hardy

  • Great British medalists: Psychosocial biographies of Super-Elite and Elite athletes from Olympic sports

    Lewis Hardy;Matthew Barlow;Lynne Evans;Tim Rees

  • The effects of perceived and received support on self-confidence.

    Tim Rees;Paul Freeman

  • Perceived social support from team-mates: Direct and stress-buffering effects on self-confidence

    Paul Freeman;Tim Rees

  • Stressors, social support and psychological responses to sport injury in high and low-performance standard participants

    Tim Rees;Ian Mitchell;Lynne Evans;Lew Hardy

  • sociaL suppoRt ModeRates the ReLationship BetWeen stRessoRs and task peRfoRMance thRough seLf-efficacy

    Tim Rees;Paul Freeman

  • How Does Perceived Support Lead to Better Performance? An Examination of Potential Mechanisms

    Paul Freeman;Tim Rees

  • Stressors, social support, and effects upon performance in golf.

    Tim Rees;Lew Hardy;Paul Freeman

  • A social identity approach to understanding and promoting physical activity

    Mark Stevens;Tim Rees;Pete Coffee;Niklas K. Steffens

  • Stressors, social support, and tests of the buffering hypothesis: Effects on psychological responses of injured athletes

    Ian Mitchell;Lynned Evans;Tim Rees;Lewis Hardy

  • The Influence of Social Support on the Lived Experiences of Spinal Cord Injured Sportsmen

    Tim Rees;Brett Smith;Andrew C. Sparkes

  • Influence of social support on athletes.

    Tim Rees

  • Social identification, exercise participation, and positive exercise experiences: Evidence from parkrun

    Mark Stevens;Tim Rees;Remco Polman

  • Social support dimensions and components of performance in tennis.

    Tim Rees;David K. Ingledew;Lew Hardy

  • The effects of perceived and received support on objective performance outcome

    Paul Freeman;Tim Rees

Frequent Co-Authors

Lew Hardy
Lew Hardy Bangor University
Mark P. Stevens
Mark P. Stevens University of Edinburgh
Niklas K. Steffens
Niklas K. Steffens University of Queensland
S. Alexander Haslam
S. Alexander Haslam University of Queensland
Remco Polman
Remco Polman Queensland University of Technology
Tim Woodman
Tim Woodman Bangor University
Jean Côté
Jean Côté Queen's University
Bruce Abernethy
Bruce Abernethy University of Queensland
Peter J. M. Openshaw
Peter J. M. Openshaw Imperial College London
Obioha C. Ukoumunne
Obioha C. Ukoumunne University of Exeter

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tim Rees

Recently Published Articles