World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 53 4149 3971 287 281 127 17386

Thomas Schwartz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Schwartz between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Schwartz published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2013. 6 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2013. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1970 2025

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Schwartz: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 3
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 4
2004 4
2005 1
2006 6
2007 5
2008 5
2009 7
2010 5
2011 12
2012 5
2013 14
2014 7
2015 11
2016 5
2017 6
2018 8
2019 10
2020 12
2021 4
2022 7
2023 4
2024 2
2025 4
Total 161
Download as CSV

Thomas Schwartz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 127 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 127
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Schwartz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217 53
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Schwartz is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in Pollution, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Medicine, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment as subfields.

Their work covers several main topics, including Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria, Biosensors and Analytical Detection, Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques, Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy, Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing, and Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies.

Notable recent papers by Thomas Schwartz include:

  • Antibiotic residues in final effluents of European wastewater treatment plants and their impact on the aquatic environment (2020, Environment International)
  • Evaluation of antibiotic resistance dissemination by wastewater treatment plant effluents with different catchment areas in Germany (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • The phylogenetic landscape and nosocomial spread of the multidrug-resistant opportunist Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Determination of antibiotic resistance genes in a WWTP-impacted river in surface water, sediment, and biofilm: Influence of seasonality and water quality (2021, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • A global multinational survey of cefotaxime-resistant coliforms in urban wastewater treatment plants (2020, Environment International)

Frequent co-authors of Schwartz include:

  • Norman Hembach
  • Peter Krolla
  • Despo Fatta-Kassinos
  • Johannes Alexander
  • Mykhailo Savin

They have published extensively in venues such as The Science of The Total Environment, Scientific Reports, Environment International, Environmental Pollution, and Small. Their contributions particularly stand out in The Science of The Total Environment, with eight publications.

Best Publications

  • Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for antibiotic resistant bacteria and genes spread into the environment: a review.

    L. Rizzo;C.M. Manaia;C. Merlin;T. Schwartz

  • Tackling antibiotic resistance: the environmental framework

    Thomas U. Berendonk;Célia M. Manaia;Christophe Merlin;Despo Fatta-Kassinos

  • Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for the release of antibiotics in the environment: a review

    I. Michael;L. Rizzo;C.S. McArdell;C.M. Manaia

  • Detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their resistance genes in wastewater, surface water, and drinking water biofilms

    Thomas Schwartz;Wolfgang Kohnen;Bernd Jansen;Ursula Obst

  • Antibiotic residues in final effluents of European wastewater treatment plants and their impact on the aquatic environment

    Sara Rodriguez-Mozaz;Ivone Vaz-Moreira;Saulo Varela Della Giustina;Marta Llorca

  • Antibiotic resistance in European wastewater treatment plants mirrors the pattern of clinical antibiotic resistance prevalence

    Katariina M. M. Pärnänen;Carlos Narciso-da-Rocha;David Kneis;Thomas U. Berendonk

  • Detection of clinically relevant antibiotic-resistance genes in municipal wastewater using real-time PCR (TaqMan)

    Holger Volkmann;Thomas Schwartz;Petra Bischoff;Silke Kirchen

  • Removal of antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their associated genes by graphene-based TiO 2 composite photocatalysts under solar radiation in urban wastewaters

    Popi Karaolia;Irene Michael-Kordatou;Evroula Hapeshi;Catherine Drosou

  • Antibiotic resistance genes in treated wastewater and in the receiving water bodies: A pan-European survey of urban settings.

    Damiano Cacace;Despo Fatta-Kassinos;Celia M. Manaia;Eddie Cytryn

  • Comparing different reactor configurations for Partial Nitritation/Anammox at low temperatures.

    Eva M. Gilbert;Shelesh Agrawal;Thomas Schwartz;Harald Horn

  • Antibiotic microbial resistance (AMR) removal efficiencies by conventional and advanced wastewater treatment processes: A review.

    C.X. Hiller;U. Hübner;S. Fajnorova;T. Schwartz

  • Ozone treatment of conditioned wastewater selects antibiotic resistance genes, opportunistic bacteria, and induce strong population shifts.

    Johannes Alexander;Gregor Knopp;Andreas Dötsch;Arne Wieland

  • Investigation of natural biofilms formed during the production of drinking water from surface water embankment filtration.

    Farahnaz Emtiazi;Thomas Schwartz;Silke Mareike Marten;Peter Krolla-Sidenstein

  • Biofilm structure and function and possible implications for riverine DOC dynamics.

    A. M. Romaní;H. Guasch;I. Muñoz;J. Ruana

  • Occurrence of the mcr-1 Colistin Resistance Gene and other Clinically Relevant Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Microbial Populations at Different Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants in Germany

    Norman Hembach;Ferdinand Schmid;Johannes Alexander;Christian Hiller

  • Relevance of Polymeric Matrix Enzymes During Biofilm Formation

    Anna M. Romaní;Katharina Fund;Joan Artigas;Thomas Schwartz

  • Response of different nitrospira species to anoxic periods depends on operational do.

    Eva Marianne Gilbert;Shelesh Agrawal;Fabian C. Brunner;Thomas Schwartz

  • Formation of natural biofilms during chlorine dioxide and u.v. disinfection in a public drinking water distribution system

    T. Schwartz;S. Hoffmann;U. Obst

  • Formation and bacterial composition of young, natural biofilms obtained from public bank-filtered drinking water systems

    Thomas Schwartz;Sandra Hoffmann;Ursula Obst

  • Pulsed electric field treatment for bacteria reduction and its impact on hospital wastewater

    Christian Gusbeth;Wolfgang Frey;Holger Volkmann;Thomas Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Despo Fatta-Kassinos
Despo Fatta-Kassinos University of Cyprus
Célia M. Manaia
Célia M. Manaia Catholic University of Portugal
Harald Horn
Harald Horn Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Pavel A. Levkin
Pavel A. Levkin Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Klaus Geider
Klaus Geider Max Planck Society
Christoph Syldatk
Christoph Syldatk Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Anna M. Romaní
Anna M. Romaní University of Girona
Sergi Sabater
Sergi Sabater University of Girona
Luigi Rizzo
Luigi Rizzo University of Salerno
Damià Barceló
Damià Barceló University of Almería

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens diverse career opportunities, often supported by complementary fields. For those interested in earth processes and resource management, obtaining a geology online degree can provide specialized knowledge in geology and geosciences, critical for environmental assessment and conservation roles.

With the rise of spatial data importance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) expertise is invaluable. Students can enhance their qualifications through gis degree programs, which teach modern mapping techniques used in natural resource management, urban planning, and climate research.

Environmental professionals often engage with public policy and administration. A one year mpa offers an accelerated pathway to master public administration, equipping graduates for leadership roles in environmental agencies and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is also key. An accredited online bachelors in sociology supports environmental careers focusing on community engagement, policy advocacy, and sustainability initiatives by exploring social dynamics and structures.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Schwartz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles