World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
48580
World Ranking
9104
National Ranking
4695

Thomas M. Hooton publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Hooton sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 242 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas M. Hooton D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Hooton sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M. Hooton is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on urinary tract infections and related urological conditions. Their body of work spans several interconnected subfields including epidemiology, pediatrics, molecular biology, rheumatology, and urology.

The scientist's research primarily revolves around the management of urinary tract infections, pediatric urology and nephrology, gut microbiota and health, pelvic floor disorders, urinary bladder and prostate research, antibiotics pharmacokinetics and efficacy, as well as bacterial research related to Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter. These topics collectively characterize the scope of their studies and contributions to infection and urological research.

Thomas M. Hooton has published in a range of journals and scientific venues. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • Nature Microbiology
  • The Lancet
  • Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Within the scientific community, Hooton has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Florian Wagenlehner
  • Caroline Perry
  • Helen Millns
  • Emily Jarvis
  • Jeremy Dennison

Their recent significant publications include:

  • "Longitudinal multi-omics analyses link gut microbiome dysbiosis with recurrent urinary tract infections in women," 2022, Nature Microbiology
  • "Oral gepotidacin versus nitrofurantoin in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3): two randomised, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3, non-inferiority trials," 2024, The Lancet
  • "A global perspective on improving patient care in uncomplicated urinary tract infection: expert consensus and practical guidance," 2021, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
  • "A reference standard for urinary tract infection research: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study," 2024, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • "Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Pyuria in Premenopausal Women," 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases

Best Publications

  • Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship

    Timothy H. Dellit;Robert C. Owens;John E. McGowan;Dale N. Gerding

  • International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

    Kalpana Gupta;Thomas M. Hooton;Kurt G. Naber;Richard Colgan

  • Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America

    Thomas M. Hooton;Suzanne F. Bradley;Diana D. Cardenas;Richard Colgan

  • Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults

    Lindsay E. Nicolle;Suzanne Bradley;Richard Colgan;James C. Rice

  • Management of urinary tract infections in adults.

    Walter E. Stamm;Thomas M. Hooton

  • A Prospective Study of Risk Factors for Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection in Young Women

    Thomas M. Hooton;Delia Scholes;James P. Hughes;Carol Winter

  • Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection

    Thomas M. Hooton

  • DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF UNCOMPLICATED URINARY TRACT INFECTION

    Thomas M. Hooton;Walter E. Stamm

  • Increasing antimicrobial resistance and the management of uncomplicated community-acquired urinary tract infections.

    Kalpana Gupta;Thomas M. Hooton;Walter E. Stamm

  • Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: 2019 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

    Lindsay E Nicolle;Kalpana Gupta;Suzanne F Bradley;Richard Colgan

  • Risk Factors for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Young Women

    Delia Scholes;Thomas M. Hooton;Pacita L. Roberts;Ann E. Stapleton

  • Identification of genes subject to positive selection in uropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli: A comparative genomics approach

    Swaine L. Chen;Chia Seui Hung;Jian Xu;Christopher S. Reigstad

  • Detection of intracellular bacterial communities in human urinary tract infection.

    David A S Rosen;Thomas M. Hooton;Walter E. Stamm;Peter A. Humphrey

  • Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975–1976: Estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients☆

    Robert W. Haley;Thomas M. Hooton;David H. Culver;Richie C. Stanley

  • Comparison of Ciprofloxacin (7 Days) and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (14 Days) for Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis in Women: A Randomized Trial

    David A. Talan;Walter E. Stamm;Thomas M. Hooton;Gregory J. Moran

  • Recurrent urinary tract infection in women

    Thomas M Hooton

  • Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase 2 Trial of a Lactobacillus crispatus Probiotic Given Intravaginally for Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection

    Ann E. Stapleton;Melissa Au-Yeung;Thomas M. Hooton;David N. Fredricks

  • Maintenance Fluconazole Therapy for Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

    Jack D. Sobel;Jack D. Sobel;Harold C. Wiesenfeld;Mark Martens;Penny Danna

  • An Outbreak of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in a Bone Marrow Transplant Center

    Robert D. Harrington;Thomas M. Hooton;Thomas M. Hooton;Robert C. Hackman;Robert C. Hackman;Gregory A. Storch;Gregory A. Storch

  • A prospective study of asymptomatic bacteriuria in sexually active young women.

    Thomas M. Hooton;Delia Scholes;Delia Scholes;Ann E. Stapleton;Pacita L. Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter E. Stamm
Walter E. Stamm University of Washington
King K. Holmes
King K. Holmes University of Washington
Scott J. Hultgren
Scott J. Hultgren Washington University in St. Louis
Lindsay E. Nicolle
Lindsay E. Nicolle University of Manitoba
John N. Krieger
John N. Krieger University of Washington
James R. Johnson
James R. Johnson University of Minnesota
David A. Eschenbach
David A. Eschenbach University of Washington
Marilyn C. Roberts
Marilyn C. Roberts University of Washington
Dedra Buchwald
Dedra Buchwald Washington State University
Anthony J. Schaeffer
Anthony J. Schaeffer Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine doesn’t always mean following a traditional path. Many students and professionals are now considering online degree options to advance their education or switch specialties. For example, pursuing a Master of Healthcare Administration from one of the best online mha programs can open leadership roles in healthcare organizations without attending classes on campus.

Registered nurses looking to boost their qualifications can take advantage of flexible rn to bsn programs without clinicals, making it easier for working professionals to fit learning into their schedules. For those seeking advanced clinical practice, there are online dnp programs designed to be completed in less time, providing a fast track to nursing leadership and clinical expertise.

Cost is often a concern, but options like the cheapest dnp programs make earning a doctorate in nursing both accessible and affordable. Each of these pathways offers flexibility, diverse career opportunities, and routes to leadership within the US healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Hooton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles