World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
47
Citations
16647
World Ranking
15460
National Ranking
3904

Jan Andzelm publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Andzelm sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 165 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Jan Andzelm D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Andzelm sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Andzelm is affiliated with the United States Army Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Materials Science, with specific focus areas within Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist has contributed to several notable topics in materials research, including:

  • Graphene research and applications
  • Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • MXene and MAX Phase Materials
  • Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
  • Energetic Materials and Combustion

Their recent published papers include:

  • Interface binding and mechanical properties of MXene-epoxy nanocomposites, 2020, Composites Science and Technology
  • Computational Study of Structural and Energetic Properties of Ammonium Perchlorate at Interfaces, 2021, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Highly Thermostable Dynamic Structures of Polyaramid Two-Dimensional Polymers, 2020, Macromolecules
  • Modeling Brittle Fractures in Epoxy Nanocomposites Using Extended Finite Element and Cohesive Zone Surface Methods, 2021, Polymers
  • Modeling Brittle Fracture in Epoxy Nanocomposites using Extended Finite Element and Cohesive Zone Surface Methods, 2021, Preprints.org

Frequent collaborators in Jan Andzelm's work include John J. S. Biswakarma, Dario A. Cruz, Erich D. Bain, Steven R. Lustig, and Yelena R. Sliozberg.

The scientist's research contributions have appeared in a range of publication venues, each having one publication listed, such as:

  • Composites Science and Technology
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Macromolecules
  • Polymers
  • Preprints.org

Jan Andzelm's work involves experimental and computational approaches to studying material interfaces, composites behavior under mechanical stresses, and the modeling of fracture processes, particularly in polymer nanocomposites. Their research covers both the fundamental chemistry and physical mechanics relevant to advanced materials used in military and engineering applications.

Best Publications

  • Optimization of Gaussian-type basis sets for local spin density functional calculations. Part I. Boron through neon, optimization technique and validation

    Nathalie Godbout;Dennis R. Salahub;Jan Andzelm;Erich Wimmer

  • Density Functional Methods in Chemistry

    Jan K. Labanowski;Jan W. Andzelm

  • A generalized synchronous transit method for transition state location

    Niranjan Govind;Max Petersen;George Fitzgerald;Dominic King-Smith

  • Density functional Gaussian‐type‐orbital approach to molecular geometries, vibrations, and reaction energies

    J. Andzelm;E. Wimmer

  • Incorporation of solvent effects into density functional calculations of molecular energies and geometries

    Jan Andzelm;Christoph Kölmel;Andreas Klamt

  • A local density functional study of the structure and vibrational frequencies of molecular transition-metal compounds

    Carlos Sosa;Jan Andzelm;Brad C. Elkin;Erich Wimmer

  • Cation-Induced Hydrogels of Cellulose Nanofibrils with Tunable Moduli

    Hong Dong;James F Snyder;Kristen S Williams;Jan W Andzelm

  • Spin contamination in density functional theory

    Jon Baker;Andrew Scheiner;Jan Andzelm

  • A study of some organic reactions using density functional theory

    Jon Baker;Max Muir;Jan Andzelm

  • Effect of adsorbates on field emission from carbon nanotubes.

    Amitesh Maiti;Jan Andzelm;Noppawan Tanpipat;Paul von Allmen

  • Geometry optimization of solids using delocalized internal coordinates

    Jan Andzelm;R.D. King-Smith;George Fitzgerald

  • Analytical gradient of the linear combination of Gaussian‐type orbitals—local spin density energy

    R. Fournier;J. Andzelm;D.R. Salahub

  • Model potential calculations for second‐row transition metal molecules within the local‐spin‐density method

    Jan Andzelm;Elżbieta Radzio;Dennis R. Salahub

  • Molecular energies and properties from density functional theory: Exploring basis set dependence of Kohn—Sham equation using several density functionals

    Andrew C. Scheiner;Jon Baker;Jan W. Andzelm

  • Compact basis sets for LCAO‐LSD calculations. Part I: Method and bases for Sc to Zn

    J. Andzelm;E. Radzio;D. R. Salahub

  • OH + H2 → H2O + H. The importance of ‘exact exchange’ in density functional theory

    Jon Baker;Jan Andzelm;Max Muir;Peter R. Taylor

  • An enhanced entangled polymer model for dissipative particle dynamics

    Timothy W. Sirk;Yelena R. Slizoberg;John K. Brennan;Martin Lisal

  • Ground and excited states of group IVA diatomics from local‐spin‐density calculations: Model potentials for Si, Ge, and Sn

    Jan Andzelm;Nino Russo;Dennis R. Salahub

  • Nanotube-based gas sensors - role of structural defects

    Jan Andzelm;Niranjan Govind;Amitesh Maiti

  • Chemical applications of density functional theory: comparison to experiment, Hartree-Fock, and perturbation theory

    George Fitzgerald;Jan Andzelm

  • A density functional study of the glycine molecule: Comparison with post‐Hartree–Fock calculations and experiment

    D. T. Nguyen;A. C. Scheiner;J. W. Andzelm;S. Sirois

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis R. Salahub
Dennis R. Salahub University of Calgary
Nino Russo
Nino Russo University of Calabria
David A. Dixon
David A. Dixon University of Alabama
Amitesh Maiti
Amitesh Maiti Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Mark O. Robbins
Mark O. Robbins Johns Hopkins University
Jürgen Bajorath
Jürgen Bajorath University of Bonn
Krzysztof Szalewicz
Krzysztof Szalewicz University of Delaware
Trygve Helgaker
Trygve Helgaker University of Oslo
Bernard Delley
Bernard Delley Paul Scherrer Institute
Martin W. Doyle
Martin W. Doyle Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, but exploring related fields can further expand your options. For those interested in legal aspects connected to scientific work, obtaining a paralegal associate degree offers valuable skills and competitive salaries. This degree can complement a chemistry background, especially in patent law or compliance roles.

Another pathway is pursuing an online associate degree like an online associates in criminal justice. Such programs prepare students for careers that intersect with forensic chemistry or regulatory enforcement, bridging the gap between science and law enforcement.

Understanding the criminal justice degree tuition is crucial when considering these educational paths. Evaluating costs and financial aid options ensures that your investment aligns with your career goals.

For those inclined toward the pharmaceutical sector, becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative is a promising option. This role leverages chemical knowledge to communicate product benefits, with attractive earning potential outlined in pharmaceutical rep salary guides. Online degrees and certifications relevant to sales can support your entry into this career.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Andzelm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles