World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Microbiology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 126 97 87 47 39 523 88477
Medicine 127 2772 2586 1547 1423 565 89423

Jack D. Sobel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack D. Sobel between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack D. Sobel published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2011. 13 of the 585 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2011. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 22 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 36 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
1971 2025

585 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack D. Sobel: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 1
1981 3
1982 3
1983 4
1984 7
1985 5
1986 5
1987 4
1988 3
1989 10
1990 14
1991 8
1992 7
1993 14
1994 9
1995 14
1996 15
1997 18
1998 14
1999 21
2000 22
2001 23
2002 16
2003 14
2004 12
2005 10
2006 13
2007 13
2008 11
2009 21
2010 21
2011 36
2012 18
2013 10
2014 16
2015 18
2016 18
2017 12
2018 7
2019 14
2020 10
2021 24
2022 19
2023 11
2024 7
2025 6
Total 585
Download as CSV

Jack D. Sobel publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack D. Sobel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 515–524 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 523 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23 523
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Jack D. Sobel D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack D. Sobel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6 126
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Microbiology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Microbiology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Jack D. Sobel is a researcher primarily affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields within health sciences, with a focus on medicine and immunology and microbiology. The research contributions include detailed studies in microbiology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, molecular biology, and physiology.

Their scholarly output addresses a range of topics, with significant attention to reproductive tract infections research. Other areas of specialization include antifungal resistance and susceptibility, nail diseases and treatments, urinary tract infections management, syphilis diagnosis and treatment, fungal infections and studies, and pelvic floor disorders treatments.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Christina A. Muzny, Paul Nyirjesy, Jane R. Schwebke, Nkechi Azie, and David Angulo. These coauthors have contributed jointly to multiple publications, highlighting ongoing partnerships in relevant subfields.

Their scientific work has been published in various venues, notably in Clinical Infectious Diseases, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, and PLoS ONE. Clinical Infectious Diseases constitutes the venue with the highest number of publications from this author.

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Jack D. Sobel include:

  • "Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Review of the Evidence for the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines" (2021), Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • "Bacterial vaginosis: drivers of recurrence and challenges and opportunities in partner treatment" (2021), BMC Medicine
  • "Ibrexafungerp Versus Placebo for Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Treatment: A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Superiority Trial (VANISH 303)" (2021), Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • "Oteseconazole: An Advance in Treatment of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis" (2021), Future Microbiology
  • "A Randomized Phase 2 Study of VT-1161 for the Treatment of Acute Vulvovaginal Candidiasis" (2020), Clinical Infectious Diseases

Best Publications

  • Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome

    Curtis Huttenhower;Curtis Huttenhower;Dirk Gevers;Rob Knight;Rob Knight;Sahar Abubucker

  • Revised Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group

    Ben De Pauw;Thomas J. Walsh;J. Peter Donnelly;David A. Stevens

  • Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

    Peter G. Pappas;Carol A. Kauffman;David R. Andes;Cornelius J. Clancy

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

    Peter G. Pappas;Carol A. Kauffman;David Andes;Daniel K. Benjamin

  • Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america.

    John R. Perfect;William E. Dismukes;Francoise Dromer;David L. Goldman

  • A framework for human microbiome research

    Barbara A. Methé;Karen E. Nelson;Mihai Pop;Heather H. Creasy

  • Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis

    Peter G. Pappas;John H. Rex;Jack D. Sobel;Scott G. Filler

  • Urinary Tract Infection

    Betsy Foxman;Robin Barlow;Hannah D'Arcy;Brenda Gillespie

  • Practice Guidelines for the Management of Cryptococcal Disease

    Michael S. Saag;Richard J. Graybill;Robert A. Larsen;Peter G. Pappas

  • The vaginal microbiome: New information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques

    Ronald F. Lamont;Jack D. Sobel;Robert A. Akins;Sonia S. Hassan

  • Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans

    Paul L. Fidel;Jose A. Vazquez;Jack D. Sobel

  • Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs.

    Betsy Foxman;Robin Barlow;Hannah D'Arcy;Brenda Gillespie

  • Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Candidiasis

    John H. Rex;Thomas J. Walsh;Jack D. Sobel;Scott G. Filler

  • Vulvovaginal candidiasis: epidemiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic considerations.

    Jack D. Sobel;Sabastian Faro;Rex W. Force;Betsy Foxman

  • Executive Summary: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

    Peter G. Pappas;Carol A. Kauffman;David R. Andes;Cornelius J. Clancy

  • Treatment of Cryptococcal Meningitis Associated with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

    van der Horst Cm;Saag Ms;Cloud Ga;Hamill Rj

  • Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials

    David R. Andes;Nasia Safdar;John W. Baddley;Geoffrey Playford

  • Emerging role of lactobacilli in the control and maintenance of the vaginal bacterial microflora.

    Vicente redondo-Lopez;Roger L. Cook;Jack D. Sobel

  • Prospective Multicenter Surveillance Study of Funguria in Hospitalized Patients

    Carol A. Kauffman;José A. Vazquez;Jack D. Sobel;Harry A. Gallis

  • A Randomized and Blinded Multicenter Trial of High-Dose Fluconazole plus Placebo versus Fluconazole plus Amphotericin B as Therapy for Candidemia and Its Consequences in Nonneutropenic Subjects

    John H. Rex;John H. Rex;Peter G. Pappas;Adolf W. Karchmer;Jack Sobel

  • Fungemia Caused by Candida Species and Torulopsis glabrata in the Hospitalized Patient: Frequency, Characteristics, and Evaluation of Factors Influencing Outcome

    Shahe V. Komshian;Ahmad K. Uwaydah;Jack D. Sobel;Lawrence R. Crane

Frequent Co-Authors

Jose A. Vazquez
Jose A. Vazquez Augusta University
Peter G. Pappas
Peter G. Pappas University of Alabama at Birmingham
John H. Rex
John H. Rex The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Denise J. Jamieson
Denise J. Jamieson Emory University
Robert S. Klein
Robert S. Klein Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Kenneth H. Mayer
Kenneth H. Mayer Harvard Medical School
Betsy Foxman
Betsy Foxman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Carol A. Kauffman
Carol A. Kauffman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Susan Cu-Uvin
Susan Cu-Uvin Brown University
Paul L. Fidel
Paul L. Fidel Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying microbiology in the USA opens doors to diverse career options in healthcare, research, and public health. For those interested in the healthcare management side, pursuing an online cahiim accredited health information management degree can provide essential skills in managing medical data and healthcare systems efficiently.

If you want to start a career quickly, exploring the shortest online medical billing and coding certificate programs offers a fast-track to entering the medical billing field. These programs are perfect for those seeking to complement their microbiology knowledge with practical administrative skills.

Many students may wonder about the variety of medical degrees online that can further enhance their qualifications. From nursing to specialized healthcare roles, these programs provide flexible options for continuing education while balancing other commitments.

For a broader public health impact, considering one of the fastest and easiest online mph programs is an excellent pathway. These programs prepare graduates to tackle public health challenges, often complementing the scientific foundation gained through microbiology studies.

Best Scientists Citing Jack D. Sobel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles