World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
17286
World Ranking
5681
National Ranking
1934

Dominique Bachelet publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominique Bachelet sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 147 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Dominique Bachelet D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominique Bachelet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Dominique Bachelet is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant emphasis on global and planetary change, ecology, earth-surface processes, and nature and landscape conservation. Their work covers a broad range of subfields, including ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

Bachelet's published research addresses various topics, with notable coverage in fire effects on ecosystems, rangeland and wildlife management, aeolian processes and effects, climate change impacts on agriculture, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and plant water relations and carbon dynamics.

Frequent coauthors in their work include Gitta Lasslop, Stijn Hantson, Almut Arneth, Sandy P. Harrison, and Sally Archibald.

They have published multiple papers in several scientific venues. These frequently include Ecosphere, Geoscientific Model Development, Global Change Biology, Fire Ecology, and Revue Neurologique.

The following papers are among their recent contributions:

  • Quantitative assessment of fire and vegetation properties in simulations with fire-enabled vegetation models from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project (2020) - Geoscientific Model Development
  • Global ecosystems and fire: Multi-model assessment of fire-induced tree-cover and carbon storage reduction (2020) - Global Change Biology
  • Seedlot Selection Tool and Climate-Smart Restoration Tool: Web-based tools for sourcing seed adapted to future climates (2022) - Ecosphere
  • Trends in western USA fire fuels using historical data and modeling (2022) - Fire Ecology
  • Contrast enhanced ultrasound of carotid plaque in acute ischemic stroke (CUSCAS study) (2020) - Revue Neurologique

Dominique Bachelet was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests

    Craig D. Allen;Alison K. Macalady;Haroun Chenchouni;Dominique Bachelet

  • A human-driven decline in global burned area

    N. Andela;N. Andela;D. C. Morton;L. Giglio;Y Chen

  • Climate Change Effects on Vegetation Distribution and Carbon Budget in the United States

    Dominique Bachelet;Ronald P. Neilson;James M. Lenihan;Raymond J. Drapek

  • GLOBAL POTENTIAL NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION PREDICTED FROM VEGETATION CLASS, PRECIPITATION, AND TEMPERATURE

    Stephen Del Grosso;Stephen Del Grosso;William Parton;Thomas Stohlgren;Daolan Zheng

  • Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California

    James M. Lenihan;Raymond Drapek;Dominique Bachelet;Ronald P. Neilson

  • The status and challenge of global fire modelling

    Stijn Hantson;Almut Arneth;Sandy P. Harrison;Sandy P. Harrison;Douglas I. Kelley;Douglas I. Kelley

  • Forest Processes and Global Environmental Change: Predicting the Effects of Individual and Multiple Stressors

    John Aber;Ronald P. Neilson;Steve McNULTY;James M. Lenihan

  • Simulating the impact of climate change on rice production in Asia and evaluating options for adaptation

    R.B. Matthews;M.J. Kropff;T. Horie;D. Bachelet

  • Agriculture in a changing climate: impacts and adaptation

    J. Reilly;W. Baethgen;F.E. Chege;S.C. van de Geijn

  • Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California

    James M. Lenihan;Dominique Bachelet;Ronald P. Neilson;Raymond Drapek

  • The Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project (FireMIP), phase 1: Experimental and analytical protocols with detailed model descriptions

    Sam S. Rabin;Sam S. Rabin;Joe R. Melton;Gitta Lasslop;Dominique Bachelet

  • DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF TREE–GRASS INTERACTIONS FOR GLOBAL CHANGE STUDIES

    Christopher Daly;Dominique Bachelet;James M. Lenihan;Ronald P. Neilson

  • Impacts of climate change on fire regimes and carbon stocks of the U.S. Pacific Northwest

    Brendan M. Rogers;Brendan M. Rogers;Ronald P. Neilson;Ray Drapek;James M. Lenihan

  • Simulating past and future dynamics of natural ecosystems in the United States

    Dominique Bachelet;Ronald P. Neilson;Thomas Hickler;Raymond J. Drapek;Raymond J. Drapek

  • Modeling the impact of climate change on rice production in Asia.

    R.B. Matthews;M.J. Kropff;D. Bachelet;T. Horie

  • Methane emissions from wetland rice areas of Asia

    D. Bachelet;H.U. Neue

  • The Adaptation for Conservation Targets (ACT) Framework: A Tool for Incorporating Climate Change into Natural Resource Management

    Molly S. Cross;Erika S. Zavaleta;Dominique Bachelet;Marjorie L. Brooks

  • The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services

    M. Rebecca Shaw;Linwood Pendleton;D. Richard Cameron;Belinda Morris

  • Quantitative assessment of fire and vegetation properties in simulations with fire-enabled vegetation models from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project

    Stijn Hantson;Stijn Hantson;Douglas I. Kelley;Almut Arneth;Sandy P. Harrison

  • Matching the Multiple Scales of Conservation with the Multiple Scales of Climate Change

    John A. Wiens;Dominique Bachelet

  • Historical (1700–2012) global multi-model estimates of the fire emissions from the Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project (FireMIP)

    Fang Li;Maria Val Martin;Meinrat O. Andreae;Meinrat O. Andreae;Almut Arneth

  • Modelling the Impact of Climate Change on Rice Production in Asia

    R.B. Matthews;M.J. Kropff;D. Bachelet;H.H. van Laar

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald P. Neilson
Ronald P. Neilson Oregon State University
Gitta Lasslop
Gitta Lasslop Max Planck Society
Thomas Hickler
Thomas Hickler Goethe University Frankfurt
Sandy P. Harrison
Sandy P. Harrison University of Reading
Almut Arneth
Almut Arneth Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Stephen Sitch
Stephen Sitch University of Exeter
Christopher Daly
Christopher Daly Oregon State University
Zhiliang Zhu
Zhiliang Zhu United States Geological Survey
Sally Archibald
Sally Archibald University of the Witwatersrand
Martin J. Kropff
Martin J. Kropff International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring online education options can lead to flexible and diverse career opportunities. Online programs make it easier to balance work, family, and studies while pursuing degrees in relevant scientific fields.

Not all online colleges are the same, so comparing features is crucial. For example, those weighing healthcare-focused programs can review differences such as capella vs wgu rn to bsn to identify schools with the best support, flexibility, and accreditation. For advanced roles in science or healthcare, online bsn to msn programs offer affordable bridge options and a pathway to leadership positions.

To ensure long-term value, consider attending not for profit online colleges, which often provide better reputations and student outcomes than for-profit institutions. For military personnel or veterans pursuing science degrees, military friendly online colleges ensure tailored support and dedicated resources.

With the right online program, you can launch or advance your career in ecology, environmental science, biological research, education, or policy—wherever life takes you.

Best Scientists Citing Dominique Bachelet

Trending Scientists