World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gitta Lasslop

Gitta Lasslop

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 39 8215 7893 508 498 95 15077

Gitta Lasslop publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gitta Lasslop between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gitta Lasslop published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2019. 5 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2019. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
2008 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gitta Lasslop: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 0
2010 7
2011 6
2012 7
2013 3
2014 3
2015 8
2016 9
2017 12
2018 12
2019 16
2020 9
2021 6
2022 5
2023 7
2024 4
2025 1
Total 116
Download as CSV

Gitta Lasslop publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gitta Lasslop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 95
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Gitta Lasslop D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gitta Lasslop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275 39
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Gitta Lasslop is a researcher affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany, specializing in environmental science with a focus on global and planetary change. Their research work spans several subfields including global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, ecology, atmospheric science, and safety, risk, reliability, and quality.

Their scholarly contributions primarily address topics such as fire effects on ecosystems, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, rangeland and wildlife management, climate variability and models, and tropical and extratropical cyclones research.

Among recent publications, key papers include:

  • "Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change" (2022) published in Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Quantitative assessment of fire and vegetation properties in simulations with fire-enabled vegetation models from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project" (2020) published in Geoscientific Model Development
  • "Global ecosystems and fire: Multi-model assessment of fire-induced tree-cover and carbon storage reduction" (2020) published in Global Change Biology
  • "Scenario setup and forcing data for impact model evaluation and impact attribution within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP3a)" (2024) published in Geoscientific Model Development
  • "Land use intensification increasingly drives the spatiotemporal patterns of the global human appropriation of net primary production in the last century" (2021) published in Global Change Biology

Lasslop frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Matthew Forrest, Thomas Hickler, Chantelle Burton, Stephen Sitch, and Stijn Hantson. Their work has been published in various scientific venues, notably Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Geoscientific Model Development, Global Change Biology, Reviews of Geophysics, and Nature Climate Change.

Their body of work reflects a consistent engagement with fire dynamics within ecosystems, modeling of vegetation and fire interactions, and the broader environmental impacts of land use changes and climate variability. This multidisciplinary approach integrates ecological, atmospheric, and environmental factors to analyze ecosystem processes and changes.

Best Publications

  • Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate

    Christian Beer;Markus Reichstein;Enrico Tomelleri;Philippe Ciais

  • Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations

    Martin Jung;Markus Reichstein;Hank A. Margolis;Alessandro Cescatti

  • Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2.

    Thorsten Mauritsen;Thorsten Mauritsen;Jürgen Bader;Tobias Becker;Jörg Behrens

  • Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation

    Gitta Lasslop;Markus Reichstein;Dario Papale;Andrew D. Richardson

  • A human-driven decline in global burned area

    N. Andela;N. Andela;D. C. Morton;L. Giglio;Y Chen

  • Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750-2015)

    Margreet J.E. Van Marle;Silvia Kloster;Brian I. Magi;Jennifer R. Marlon

  • Global Convergence in the Temperature Sensitivity of Respiration at Ecosystem Level

    Miguel D. Mahecha;Markus Reichstein;Nuno Carvalhais;Gitta Lasslop

  • The status and challenge of global fire modelling

    Stijn Hantson;Almut Arneth;Sandy P. Harrison;Sandy P. Harrison;Douglas I. Kelley;Douglas I. Kelley

  • Reconciling leaf physiological traits and canopy flux data: Use of the TRY and FLUXNET databases in the Community Land Model version 4

    Gordon B. Bonan;Keith W. Oleson;Rosie A. Fisher;Gitta Lasslop

  • The Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project (FireMIP), phase 1: Experimental and analytical protocols with detailed model descriptions

    Sam S. Rabin;Sam S. Rabin;Joe R. Melton;Gitta Lasslop;Dominique Bachelet

  • Semiempirical modeling of abiotic and biotic factors controlling ecosystem respiration across eddy covariance sites

    Mirco Migliavacca;Mirco Migliavacca;Markus Reichstein;Andrew D. Richardson;Roberto Colombo

  • Influences of observation errors in eddy flux data on inverse model parameter estimation

    Gitta Lasslop;M. Reichstein;J. Kattge;D. Papale

  • Emergent relationships with respect to burned area in global satellite observations and fire-enabled vegetation models

    Matthias Forkel;Niels Andela;Sandy P. Harrison;Gitta Lasslop

  • Quantitative assessment of fire and vegetation properties in simulations with fire-enabled vegetation models from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project

    Stijn Hantson;Stijn Hantson;Douglas I. Kelley;Almut Arneth;Sandy P. Harrison

  • Influence of Fire on the Carbon Cycle and Climate

    Gitta Lasslop;Alysha I. Coppola;Apostolos Voulgarakis;Chao Yue

  • Historical (1700–2012) global multi-model estimates of the fire emissions from the Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project (FireMIP)

    Fang Li;Maria Val Martin;Meinrat O. Andreae;Meinrat O. Andreae;Almut Arneth

  • Global ecosystems and fire: Multi-model assessment of fire-induced tree-cover and carbon storage reduction.

    Gitta Lasslop;Stijn Hantson;Sandy P. Harrison;Dominique Bachelet

  • SPITFIRE within the MPI Earth system model: Model development and evaluation

    Gitta Lasslop;Kirsten Thonicke;Silvia Kloster

  • CMIP6.CMIP.MPI-M.MPI-ESM1-2-HR.historical

    Johann Jungclaus;Matthias Bittner;Karl-Hermann Wieners;Fabian Wachsmann

  • Recent global and regional trends in burned area and their compensating environmental controls

    Matthias Forkel;Wouter Dorigo;Gitta Lasslop;Emilio Chuvieco

  • Effect of spatial sampling from European flux towers for estimating carbon and water fluxes with artificial neural networks

    Dario Papale;T. Andrew Black;Nuno Carvalhais;Alessandro Cescatti

Frequent Co-Authors

Silvia Kloster
Silvia Kloster Max Planck Society
Almut Arneth
Almut Arneth Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Sandy P. Harrison
Sandy P. Harrison University of Reading
Markus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Victor Brovkin
Victor Brovkin Max Planck Society
Christian Reick
Christian Reick Max Planck Society
Thorsten Mauritsen
Thorsten Mauritsen Stockholm University
Julia Pongratz
Julia Pongratz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Erich Roeckner
Erich Roeckner Max Planck Society
Jochem Marotzke
Jochem Marotzke Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences often intersects with various social sciences and advanced degrees that broaden your expertise and job prospects. For example, combining environmental knowledge with social research can be enhanced through an online bachelors in sociology, which provides valuable insights into societal impacts on environmental issues.

For those interested in leadership or academic roles, exploring advanced degrees like a doctorate is essential. Fortunately, options such as a doctorate degree online no dissertation offer flexible paths to earn your doctorate without the traditional dissertation, making them accessible for working professionals.

Transitioning between educational levels can also be streamlined with programs like eds to edd bridge programs online. These pathways help educators and environmental advocates advance their qualifications efficiently while continuing their careers.

Additionally, specializing through degrees such as an online dsw programs can complement environmental science expertise by focusing on social work and community resilience, crucial for addressing environmental justice and policy implementation.

Best Scientists Citing Gitta Lasslop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles