World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 45 3796 3497 1813 1639 129 11608

Thomas J. Johnson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas J. Johnson between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas J. Johnson published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2010. 2 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2010. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1992 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas J. Johnson: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 3
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 1
2002 3
2003 6
2004 5
2005 3
2006 4
2007 5
2008 3
2009 9
2010 14
2011 13
2012 10
2013 8
2014 6
2015 4
2016 7
2017 6
2018 1
2019 5
2020 2
2021 3
2022 4
2023 2
2024 1
2025 1
Total 142
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Johnson publications per year - data summary

  • Thomas J. Johnson, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, has 142 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992, 1994, 1998, 2001 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 34 years in the span carries no publications at all (1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.3 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 11 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 26 publications (2.2 per year); 2004-2015: 84 publications (7.0 per year); 2016-2025: 32 publications (3.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Thomas J. Johnson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 129
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Johnson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Thomas J. Johnson, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, records 129 publications - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Thomas J. Johnson, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Thomas J. Johnson ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Thomas J. Johnson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260 45
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Johnson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Thomas J. Johnson, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, records 45 D-Index - the 52nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 52% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Thomas J. Johnson, and about 48% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Thomas J. Johnson falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Thomas J. Johnson is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with significant contributions in the subfields of Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Global and Planetary Change, Speech and Hearing, Food Science, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work covers a variety of topics related to health and the environment, including:

  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Impact of Light on Environment and Health
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Food Supply Chain Traceability
  • Cinema and Media Studies
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Johnson has published papers in several venues, with notable frequent publications in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Sensors Letters
  • Computational Urban Science
  • Data in Brief
  • Adaptation

Recent peer-reviewed papers authored or coauthored by Johnson include:

  • "DigitalExposome: quantifying impact of urban environment on wellbeing using sensor fusion and deep learning," 2023, Computational Urban Science
  • "Urban Wellbeing: A Portable Sensing Approach to Unravel the Link Between Environment and Mental Wellbeing," 2023, IEEE Sensors Letters
  • "DigitalExposome: A dataset for wellbeing classification using environmental air quality and human physiological data," 2025, Data in Brief
  • "Appropriation Anxiety: Watchmen (2019)," 2020, Adaptation

While Johnson is not the author of all items in the dataset, such as the paper on livestock monitoring published in 2024, their body of work remains centered on integrating environmental sensing technologies with health and wellbeing research.

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors including:

  • Eiman Kanjo
  • Kieran Woodward
  • Bradley Patrick
  • Michael Gibbs
  • Amna Anwar

Best Publications

  • Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users

    Thomas Jerrold Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

  • Cruising is Believing?: Comparing Internet and Traditional Sources on Media Credibility Measures:

    Thomas Jerrold Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

  • Online and in the Know: Uses and Gratifications of the Web for Political Information

    Barbara K. Kaye;Thomas J. Johnson

  • The Revolution Will be Networked

    Weiwu Zhang;Thomas J. Johnson;Trent Seltzer;Shannon L. Bichard

  • Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested internet users

    Thomas Jerrold Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

  • Every Blog Has Its Day: Politically-interested Internet Users' Perceptions of Blog Credibility

    Thomas J. Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye;Shannon L. Bichard;W. Joann Wong

  • Research methodology: Taming the cyber frontier: Techniques for improving online surveys

    Barbara K. Kaye;Thomas Jerrold Johnson

  • Webelievability: A Path Model Examining How Convenience and Reliance Predict Online Credibility:

    Thomas Jerrold Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

  • A boost or bust for democracy? How the web influenced political attitudes and behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections

    Thomas Jerrold Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

  • A web for all reasons: uses and gratifications of internet components for political information

    Barbara K. Kaye;Thomas J. Johnson

  • In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the internet among politically interested internet users

    Thomas J. Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

  • The Arab Spring| Overthrowing the Protest Paradigm? How The New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter Covered the Egyptian Revolution

    Summer Harlow;Thomas J. Johnson

  • Overthrowing the Protest Paradigm? How The New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter Covered the Egyptian Revolution

    Summer Harlow;Thomas J. Johnson

  • Environmentalism and NIMBYism in China: promoting a rules-based approach to public participation

    Thomas Johnson

  • From here to obscurity?: media substitution theory and traditional media in an on-line world

    Barbara K. Kaye;Thomas J. Johnson

  • Credibility of Social Network Sites for Political Information Among Politically Interested Internet Users

    Thomas J. Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

  • Communication Communities or CyberGhettos?: A Path Analysis Model Examining Factors that Explain Selective Exposure to Blogs

    Thomas Jerrold Johnson;Shannon L. Bichard;Weiwu Zhang

  • Spreading Ebola Panic: Newspaper and Social Media Coverage of the 2014 Ebola Health Crisis

    Unknown

  • Doing the Traditional Media Sidestep: Comparing the Effects of the Internet and Other Nontraditional Media with Traditional Media in the 1996 Presidential Campaign:

    Thomas Jerrold Johnson;Mahmoud A.M. Braima;Jayanthi Sothirajah

  • Demonstration of ignition radiation temperatures in indirect-drive inertial confinement fusion hohlraums.

    S. H. Glenzer;B. J. MacGowan;N. B. Meezan;P. A. Adams

  • Choosing Is Believing? How Web Gratifications and Reliance Affect Internet Credibility Among Politically Interested Users

    Thomas Jerrold Johnson;Barbara Kaye

  • Around the world wide web in 80 ways: how motives for going online are linked to internet activities among politically interested internet users

    Thomas J. Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

  • "How We Performed": Embedded Journalists' Attitudes and Perceptions towards Covering the Iraq War

    Shahira Fahmy;Thomas J. Johnson

  • Site Effects: How Reliance on Social Media Influences Confidence in the Government and News Media

    Thomas J. Johnson;Barbara K. Kaye

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara K. Kaye
Barbara K. Kaye University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Gregory B. Pasternack
Gregory B. Pasternack University of California, Davis
Wayne Wanta
Wayne Wanta University of Florida
Michael Stadermann
Michael Stadermann Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
S. W. Haan
S. W. Haan Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Otto Landen
Otto Landen Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
A. J. Mackinnon
A. J. Mackinnon Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
B. J. MacGowan
B. J. MacGowan Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Siegfried Glenzer
Siegfried Glenzer Stanford University
Sally Andrews
Sally Andrews University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to meaningful online degrees and rewarding career pathways. As demand grows for flexible education, students increasingly pursue programs such as the masters in social work online. These programs prepare graduates for dynamic roles in social advocacy and public welfare.

For those interested in understanding human behavior, an online accelerated psychology degree offers intensive yet flexible study options. These programs can fast-track your entry into roles in clinical support, mental health, or organizational psychology.

Aspiring counselors should consider cacrep-accredited counseling programs. These ensure a standardized curriculum and meet the prerequisites for professional licensure, a crucial step for working in mental health or school counseling.

Additionally, earning a marriage and family therapist degree online can position graduates for impactful careers supporting diverse families and relationships. With robust online study options and growing career opportunities, the USA provides an excellent pathway for students eager to make a real difference.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles