World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 48 18278 16781 830 762 111 10411

Thomas Henry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Henry between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Henry published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2023. 15 of the 147 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications
2001 2025

147 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Henry: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 1
2009 2
2010 3
2011 0
2012 3
2013 8
2014 9
2015 8
2016 11
2017 2
2018 15
2019 5
2020 10
2021 13
2022 10
2023 20
2024 10
2025 5
Total 147
Download as CSV

Thomas Henry publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Henry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 107–116 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 111 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704 111
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Henry D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Henry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718 48
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Henry is affiliated with Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 in France. Their research spans several interrelated fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Immunology and Microbiology. These broad areas are further detailed through subfields such as Molecular Biology, Immunology, Genetics, Infectious Diseases, and Cancer Research.

Their work includes a focus on several main topics, notably inflammasomes and immune disorders, immune response and inflammation, interferon and immune responses, autoimmune and inflammatory disorders research, IL-33, ST2, and ILC pathways, Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research, and Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide.

Thomas Henry has authored multiple papers with varied research interests. Recent publications include:

  • "Should we stimulate or suppress immune responses in COVID-19? Cytokine and anti-cytokine interventions" (2020) published in Autoimmunity Reviews
  • "Guanylate-binding proteins convert cytosolic bacteria into caspase-4 signaling platforms" (2020) published in Nature Immunology
  • "NLRP3 phosphorylation in its LRR domain critically regulates inflammasome assembly" (2021) published in Nature Communications
  • "Transcriptional Regulation of Inflammasomes" (2020) published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "Irgm2 and Gate-16 cooperatively dampen Gram-negative bacteria-induced caspase-11 response" (2020) published in EMBO Reports

The scientist often collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including Yvan Jamilloux, Alessandra Carbone, Mustafa Tekpinar, Alexandre Bélot, and P. Sève. These partnerships reflect an active research network.

Thomas Henry's work is published across numerous venues, notably Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Scientific Reports, and the Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Best Publications

  • Should we stimulate or suppress immune responses in COVID-19? Cytokine and anti-cytokine interventions.

    Yvan Jamilloux;Yvan Jamilloux;Thomas Henry;Alexandre Belot;Sébastien Viel

  • T-bet and Eomes instruct the development of two distinct natural killer cell lineages in the liver and in the bone marrow

    Cécile Daussy;Fabrice Faure;Katia Mayol;Sébastien Viel

  • Absent in melanoma 2 is required for innate immune recognition of Francisella tularensis

    Jonathan W. Jones;Nobuhiko Kayagaki;Petr Broz;Thomas Henry

  • Critical function for Naip5 in inflammasome activation by a conserved carboxy-terminal domain of flagellin

    Karla L. Lightfield;Jenny Persson;Sky W. Brubaker;Chelsea E. Witte

  • Staphylococcus aureus hemolysins, bi-component leukocidins, and cytolytic peptides: a redundant arsenal of membrane-damaging virulence factors?

    Francois Vandenesch;Francois Vandenesch;Gérard Lina;Gérard Lina;Thomas Henry;Thomas Henry

  • Type I interferon signaling is required for activation of the inflammasome during Francisella infection

    Thomas Henry;Anna Brotcke;David S. Weiss;Lucinda J. Thompson

  • In vivo negative selection screen identifies genes required for Francisella virulence

    David S. Weiss;Anna Brotcke;Thomas Henry;Jeffrey J. Margolis

  • The Staphylococcal Toxin Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Targets Human C5a Receptors

    András N. Spaan;Thomas Henry;Willemien J.M. van Rooijen;Magali Perret

  • Guanylate-binding proteins promote activation of the AIM2 inflammasome during infection with Francisella novicida.

    Etienne Meunier;Pierre Wallet;Roland F Dreier;Stéphanie Costanzo

  • The intracellular fate of Salmonella depends on the recruitment of kinesin.

    Emmanuel Boucrot;Thomas Henry;Jean-Paul Borg;Jean-Pierre Gorvel

  • AIM2/ASC triggers caspase-8-dependent apoptosis in Francisella-infected caspase-1-deficient macrophages.

    R Pierini;R Pierini;C Juruj;C Juruj;M Perret;M Perret;C L Jones

  • LPS targets host guanylate‐binding proteins to the bacterial outer membrane for non‐canonical inflammasome activation

    José Carlos Santos;José Carlos Santos;Mathias S Dick;Brice Lagrange;Daniel Degrandi

  • Guanylate-binding proteins convert cytosolic bacteria into caspase-4 signaling platforms.

    Michal P. Wandel;Bae-Hoon Kim;Eui-Soon Park;Eui-Soon Park;Keith B. Boyle

  • The Salmonella effector protein PipB2 is a linker for kinesin-1.

    Thomas Henry;Carole Couillault;Patrick Rockenfeller;Emmanuel Boucrot

  • Type I IFN Signaling Constrains IL-17A/F Secretion by γδ T cells during Bacterial Infections

    Thomas Henry;Girish S. Kirimanjeswara;Thomas Ruby;Jonathan W. Jones

  • Regulation of Mouse NK Cell Development and Function by Cytokines

    Antoine Marçais;Sébastien Viel;Morgan Grau;Thomas Henry

  • The staphylococcal toxins γ-haemolysin AB and CB differentially target phagocytes by employing specific chemokine receptors

    Andras N. Spaan;Manouk Vrieling;Pierre Wallet;Cedric Badiou

  • Pathogenesis of adult-onset Still’s disease: new insights from the juvenile counterpart

    Yvan Jamilloux;Mathieu Gerfaud-Valentin;Fabio Martinon;Alexandre Belot

  • The translocated Salmonella effector proteins SseF and SseG interact and are required to establish an intracellular replication niche.

    Jörg Deiwick;Jörg Deiwick;Suzana P. Salcedo;Emmanuel Boucrot;Sarah M. Gilliland

  • Human caspase-4 detects tetra-acylated LPS and cytosolic Francisella and functions differently from murine caspase-11.

    Brice Lagrange;Sacha Benaoudia;Pierre Wallet;Flora Magnotti

Frequent Co-Authors

François Vandenesch
François Vandenesch Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Thierry Walzer
Thierry Walzer Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Gerard Lina
Gerard Lina Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Jos A. G. van Strijp
Jos A. G. van Strijp Utrecht University
Denise M. Monack
Denise M. Monack Stanford University
Kok P. M. van Kessel
Kok P. M. van Kessel Utrecht University
Alain Charbit
Alain Charbit Université Paris Cité
Jean-Pierre Gorvel
Jean-Pierre Gorvel Aix-Marseille University
Petr Broz
Petr Broz University of Lausanne
Michael P. Jennings
Michael P. Jennings Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and professional pathways. For those interested in human health and nutrition, pursuing a masters in nutrition online allows students to focus on the science behind diet and wellness, often leading to roles in clinical nutrition or public health.

If you are drawn to medical diagnostics, online healthcare technology programs are also worth considering. Accredited ultrasound tech programs online can provide hands-on training and certification remotely, helping you prepare for a fast-growing job market in medical imaging.

Another relevant option is enrolling in online radiology programs, which offer flexible pathways to careers in radiologic technology and medical imaging.

For advanced study, a variety of dietetic masters programs are available online, preparing graduates for leadership roles in clinical dietetics and research. Exploring these options can help you tailor your career path according to your interests and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Henry

Trending Scientists