World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
94
Citations
27938
World Ranking
2036
National Ranking
140

Thomas Gudermann publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Gudermann sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 400 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas Gudermann D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Gudermann sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Physiology and Pharmacology/Toxicology

Overview

Thomas Gudermann is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research spans a range of topics primarily within Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The scientist has contributed significantly to subfields such as Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Sensory Systems, Plant Science, and Physiology. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the topics addressed in their publications, including:

  • Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Magnesium in Health and Disease
  • Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
  • Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
  • Trace Elements in Health
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology

Thomas Gudermann has published extensively, with papers appearing frequently in journals such as Archives of Toxicology and Cells, each with seven publications, as well as Nature Communications and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), both with six. They also have four publications in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Recent papers authored by or involving Thomas Gudermann include:

  • "Agonist-mediated switching of ion selectivity in TPC2 differentially promotes lysosomal function" (2020, eLife)
  • "Platelet-Cancer Interplay: Molecular Mechanisms and New Therapeutic Avenues" (2021, Frontiers in Oncology)
  • "Chemosensory Cell-Derived Acetylcholine Drives Tracheal Mucociliary Clearance in Response to Virulence-Associated Formyl Peptides" (2020, Immunity)
  • "A Calcium Guard in the Outer Membrane: Is VDAC a Regulated Gatekeeper of Mitochondrial Calcium Uptake?" (2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • "Lung emphysema and impaired macrophage elastase clearance in mucolipin 3 deficient mice" (2022, Nature Communications)

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including Vladimir Chubanov, Alexander Dietrich, Andreas Breit, Susanna Zierler, and Michael Mederos y Schnitzler. Co-authorship counts indicate sustained collaborative research with these colleagues.

Thomas Gudermann has been recognized by the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina with an award in 2009, noted specifically in the domains of Physiology and Pharmacology/Toxicology.

Best Publications

  • Direct activation of human TRPC6 and TRPC3 channels by diacylglycerol.

    Thomas Hofmann;Alexander G. Obukhov;Michael Schaefer;Christian Harteneck

  • Subunit composition of mammalian transient receptor potential channels in living cells

    Thomas Hofmann;Michael Schaefer;Günter Schultz;Thomas Gudermann

  • Positional cloning uncovers mutations in PLCE1 responsible for a nephrotic syndrome variant that may be reversible.

    Bernward Hinkes;Roger C. Wiggins;Rasheed Gbadegesin;Christopher N. Vlangos

  • TRPM3 Is a Nociceptor Channel Involved in the Detection of Noxious Heat

    Joris Vriens;Grzegorz Owsianik;Thomas Hofmann;Stephan E. Philipp

  • Increased Vascular Smooth Muscle Contractility in TRPC6 −/− Mice

    Alexander Dietrich;Michael Mederos y Schnitzler;Maik Gollasch;Volkmar Gross

  • Receptor-mediated regulation of the nonselective cation channels TRPC4 and TRPC5.

    Michael Schaefer;Timothy D. Plant;Alexander G. Obukhov;Thomas Hofmann

  • Disruption of TRPM6/TRPM7 complex formation by a mutation in the TRPM6 gene causes hypomagnesemia with secondary hypocalcemia

    Vladimir Chubanov;Siegfried Waldegger;Michael Mederos y Schnitzler;Helga Vitzthum

  • TRPM5 Is a Voltage-Modulated and Ca2+-Activated Monovalent Selective Cation Channel

    Thomas Hofmann;Vladimir Chubanov;Thomas Gudermann;Craig Montell

  • Diversity and Selectivity of Receptor-G Protein Interaction

    T Gudermann;F Kalkbrenner;G Schultz

  • FUNCTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY OF SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION VIA G-PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORS

    Thomas Gudermann;Torsten Schöneberg;Günter Schultz

  • Dantrolene rescues arrhythmogenic RYR2 defect in a patient‐specific stem cell model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

    Christian B. Jung;Alessandra Moretti;Michael Mederos y Schnitzler;Laura Iop

  • Migrating Platelets Are Mechano-scavengers that Collect and Bundle Bacteria.

    Florian Gaertner;Zerkah Ahmad;Gerhild Rosenberger;Shuxia Fan

  • Classical transient receptor potential channel 6 (TRPC6) is essential for hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and alveolar gas exchange.

    Norbert Weissmann;Alexander Dietrich;Beate Fuchs;Hermann Kalwa

  • Gq-coupled receptors as mechanosensors mediating myogenic vasoconstriction

    Michael Mederos y Schnitzler;Ursula Storch;Simone Meibers;Pascal Nurwakagari

  • TRPM6 and TRPM7—Gatekeepers of human magnesium metabolism

    Karl P. Schlingmann;Siegfried Waldegger;Martin Konrad;Vladimir Chubanov

  • Melanocortin-4 receptor gene: case-control study and transmission disequilibrium test confirm that functionally relevant mutations are compatible with a major gene effect for extreme obesity.

    Anke Hinney;Sarah Hohmann;Frank Geller;Constanze Vogel

  • Melanocortin-4 Receptor Gene Variant I103 Is Negatively Associated with Obesity

    Frank Geller;Kathrin Reichwald;Astrid Dempfle;Thomas Illig

  • Pressure-induced and store-operated cation influx in vascular smooth muscle cells is independent of TRPC1

    Alexander Dietrich;Hermann Kalwa;Ursula Storch;Michael Mederos y Schnitzler

  • Insights into the molecular nature of magnesium homeostasis

    Martin Konrad;Karl P. Schlingmann;Thomas Gudermann

  • Receptors and G proteins as primary components of transmembrane signal transduction. Part 1. G-protein-coupled receptors: structure and function.

    T Gudermann;B Nürnberg;G Schultz

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Dietrich
Alexander Dietrich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Günter Schultz
Günter Schultz Freie Universität Berlin
Horst Thiermann
Horst Thiermann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Torsten Schöneberg
Torsten Schöneberg Leipzig University
Norbert Weissmann
Norbert Weissmann University of Giessen
Stefan Offermanns
Stefan Offermanns Max Planck Society
Robert Grosse
Robert Grosse University of Freiburg
Ralph T. Schermuly
Ralph T. Schermuly University of Giessen
Wolfgang Kummer
Wolfgang Kummer University of Giessen
Bernd Nilius
Bernd Nilius KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to a variety of specialized careers in healthcare, life sciences, and information management. For those interested in administrative roles, consider exploring whether is medical billing and coding worth it. This pathway can offer stable opportunities, but it's important to weigh the pros and cons carefully.

If managing data and ensuring the smooth flow of patient information appeals to you, a health information management degree may be the ideal next step. These programs emphasize the bridge between healthcare, technology, and organizational management.

For students looking to specialize further, the availability of an online nutrition masters makes it accessible to gain advanced expertise in a growing field focused on health and disease prevention.

Hands-on careers are also accessible online. Diagnostic imaging is crucial in modern medicine, and sonography programs online provide flexible pathways for those wishing to become ultrasound technicians.

Each path offers unique benefits and challenges. By choosing the right online program, you can align your educational and career goals with the needs of the healthcare and science industries.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Gudermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles