World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
21935
World Ranking
4187
National Ranking
254

Teresa K. Attwood publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teresa K. Attwood sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 257 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Teresa K. Attwood D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teresa K. Attwood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Teresa K. Attwood is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses extensively on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions to Molecular Biology, Information Systems and Management, Information Systems, Education, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics covered by their research include Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research, along with Scientific Computing and Data Management, Research Data Management Practices, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Biomedical and Engineering Education, Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, and Gene expression and cancer classification.

Among their recent papers, they have contributed to:

  • Ten simple rules for making training materials FAIR, 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • TeSS: a platform for discovering life-science training opportunities, 2020, Bioinformatics
  • Bioschemas training profiles: A set of specifications for standardizing training information to facilitate the discovery of training programs and resources, 2023, PLoS Computational Biology
  • Course design: Considerations for trainers - a Professional Guide, 2020, IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
  • Guidelines for curriculum and course development in higher education and training, 2020, Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Patricia M. Palagi
  • Niall Beard
  • Allegra Via
  • Leyla García
  • Bérénice Batut

Teresa K. Attwood's publications often appear in the following venues:

  • Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd
  • QUBES
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
  • Bioinformatics

Best Publications

  • InterPro: the integrative protein signature database

    Sarah Hunter;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch

  • The InterPro Database, 2003 brings increased coverage and new features

    Nicola J Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa K Attwood;Amos Marc Bairoch

  • InterPro in 2017-beyond protein family and domain annotations

    Robert D. Finn;Teresa K. Attwood;Patricia C. Babbitt;Alex Bateman

  • InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations.

    Alex L. Mitchell;Teresa K. Attwood;Patricia C. Babbitt;Matthias Blum

  • The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years

    Alex L. Mitchell;Hsin-Yu Chang;Louise C. Daugherty;Matthew Fraser

  • The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites

    Rolf Apweiler;Terri K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch;Alex Bateman

  • InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database

    Sarah Hunter;Philip Jones;Alex Mitchell;Rolf Apweiler

  • InterPro, progress and status in 2005

    Nicola J. Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch

  • New developments in the InterPro database

    Nicola J. Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch

  • PRINTS and its automatic supplement, prePRINTS

    Terri K. Attwood;Paul Bradley;Darren R. Flower;Anna Gaulton

  • Introduction To Bioinformatics

    Teresa K. Attwood;Daniel J. Parry-Smith

  • Fingerprinting G-protein-coupled receptors

    T. K. Attwood;J. B. C. Findlay

  • InterPro--an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites

    Rolf Apweiler;Terri K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch;Alex Bateman

  • The Babel of Bioinformatics

    Teresa K. Attwood

  • Recommendations for Biomarker Identification and Qualification in Clinical Proteomics

    Harald Mischak;Guenter Allmaier;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa Attwood

  • PRINTS-S: the database formerly known as PRINTS

    Terri K. Attwood;Michael D. R. Croning;Darren R. Flower;A. P. Lewis

  • Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles.

    Alain Coletta;Alain Coletta;John J.W. Pinney;David Weiss Solís;David Weiss Solís;James Marsh

  • InterPro: An integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites

    Nicola J. Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Terri K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch

  • The PRINTS database: a fine-grained protein sequence annotation and analysis resource--its status in 2012.

    Teresa K. Attwood;Alain Coletta;Gareth Muirhead;Athanasia Pavlopoulou

  • OWL--a non-redundant composite protein sequence database.

    A J Bleasby;D Akrigg;T K Attwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Pettifer
Steve Pettifer University of Manchester
Darren R. Flower
Darren R. Flower Aston University
Nicola Mulder
Nicola Mulder University of Cape Town
Alex Bateman
Alex Bateman European Bioinformatics Institute
Amos Marc Bairoch
Amos Marc Bairoch Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Rodrigo Lopez
Rodrigo Lopez European Bioinformatics Institute
Peer Bork
Peer Bork European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Rolf Apweiler
Rolf Apweiler European Bioinformatics Institute
Ivica Letunic
Ivica Letunic European Bioinformatics Institute
Daniel Kahn
Daniel Kahn Claude Bernard University Lyon 1

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA unlocks a range of related online degrees and certifications. Many students consider broadening their expertise with a cheapest online physics degree, ideal for those interested in the fundamentals of computation, research, and science.

Data science is another top choice, with options for a data science degree offering strong job prospects and practical skills in analyzing data and solving real-world problems.

For tech-minded students, pursuing an electrical engineering degree online admissions pathway can open doors to roles in hardware, electronics, and systems engineering.

If you are looking to upskill quickly, there are also certifications that pay well in fields such as networking, cybersecurity, or software development. These certifications can be completed online and increase your employability in the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Teresa K. Attwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles