World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
27511
World Ranking
6786
National Ranking
3676

Stanley Schachter publications per year

1950: 5 publications 1951: 2 publications 1952: 1 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 2 publications 1955: 1 publications 1956: 3 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 3 publications 1960: 1 publications 1961: 1 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 3 publications 1964: 4 publications 1965: 1 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 1 publications 1968: 4 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 11 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publications 1982: 1 publications 1983: 1 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publications
1950 2012

80 publications in total across all disciplines

Stanley Schachter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Schachter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stanley Schachter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Schachter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 1983 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1969 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 1967 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Stanley Schachter was affiliated with Columbia University in the United States during their academic career. Their work contributed to the broader field of psychology, reflected in recognition by prominent organizations within the discipline.

Over the course of their career, Schachter received several awards acknowledging their contributions to psychological science. These awards included the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 1969, election as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1983, and the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 1989. Earlier in their career, Schachter was named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1967.

Information on specific research topics, publication venues, co-authors, and detailed research contributions was not provided, thus not included in this profile.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.

    Stanley Schachter;Jerome Singer

  • The Psychology of Affiliation

    Stanley Schachter

  • The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State

    Stanley Schachter

  • Deviation, rejection, and communication.

    Stanley Schachter

  • Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing

    Leon Festinger;Stanley Schachter;Kurt W. Back

  • Social pressures in informal groups

    Leon Festinger;Stanley Schachter;Kurt Back

  • When Prophecy Fails

    Leon Festinger;Henry W. Riecken;Stanley Schachter

  • Some extraordinary facts about obese humans and rats.

    Stanley Schachter

  • Obesity and Eating

    Stanley Schachter

  • Effects of fear, food deprivation, and obesity on eating.

    Stanley Schachter;Ronald Goldman;Andrew Gordon

  • Cognitive manipulation of pain

    Richard E Nisbett;Stanley Schachter

  • Recidivism and self-cure of smoking and obesity.

    Stanley Schachter

  • The Psychology of Affiliation: Experimental Studies of the Sources of Gregariousness

    Stanley Schachter

  • When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world.

    Leon Festinger;Henry W. Riecken;Stanley Schachter

  • Obese Humans and Rats

    Stanley Schachter;Judith Rodin

  • Manipulated time and eating behavior

    Stanley Schachter;Larry P. Gross

  • Speech Disfluency and the Structure of Knowledge

    Stanley Schachter;Nicholas Christenfeld;Bernard Ravina;Frances Bilous

  • Emotion, Obesity and Crime

    Stanley Schachter

  • Pharmacological and Psychological Determinants of Smoking

    Stanley Schachter

  • Epinephrine, chlorpromazine, and amusement.

    Stanley Schachter;Ladd Wheeler

  • "Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state": Erratum

    Stanley Schachter;Jerome Singer

Frequent Co-Authors

Leon Festinger
Leon Festinger New School
Lynn T. Kozlowski
Lynn T. Kozlowski University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Donald C. Hood
Donald C. Hood Columbia University
William Gerin
William Gerin Pennsylvania State University
Nicholas Christenfeld
Nicholas Christenfeld University of California, San Diego
Michael S. Gazzaniga
Michael S. Gazzaniga University of California, Santa Barbara
Richard E. Nisbett
Richard E. Nisbett University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bibb Latané
Bibb Latané Florida Atlantic University
Alexandra W. Logue
Alexandra W. Logue City University of New York
C. Peter Herman
C. Peter Herman University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology, you may also be interested in related fields such as social work. Social work often shares foundational knowledge with psychology, and the educational pathways sometimes overlap with online degree options.

Requirements for becoming a social worker can differ by state. For example, Georgia social work education requirements include obtaining a degree from a CSWE-accredited program and completing supervised experience. In Hawaii, the process focuses on becoming a social worker in Hawaii through a combination of education, examination, and licensure.

If you’re exploring the Northwest, you’ll encounter specific Idaho social work education requirements, which also stress accredited education and exam passage. Similarly, becoming a social worker in Illinois requires careful attention to state licensure laws and practical training hours.

With flexible online degrees now available, students can meet these requirements while balancing personal and professional commitments, preparing for careers that support mental health and well-being in diverse communities.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley Schachter

Recently Published Articles