World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4889 4529 2319 2110 91 12915

Sharad Goel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sharad Goel between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sharad Goel published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2023. 16 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2023. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
1997 2025

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sharad Goel: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 1
2008 6
2009 7
2010 5
2011 1
2012 7
2013 2
2014 4
2015 5
2016 11
2017 8
2018 8
2019 5
2020 11
2021 10
2022 5
2023 23
2024 7
2025 9
Total 143
Download as CSV

Sharad Goel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharad Goel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 91 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 91
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Sharad Goel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharad Goel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Sharad Goel is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has a publication record primarily in the social sciences. Their research interests focus on political science and international relations, artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, economics and econometrics, as well as statistics and probability.

Their work covers a range of topics including electoral systems and political participation, internet traffic analysis and secure e-voting, game theory and voting systems, crime patterns and interventions, ethics and social impacts of AI, criminal justice and corrections analysis, and advanced causal inference techniques.

Sharad Goel has published extensively in several frequent venues such as Harvard Dataverse, arXiv (Cornell University), SSRN Electronic Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

Frequent collaborators in Sharad Goel's research include Marc Meredith, David Rothschild, Michael Morse, Houshmand Shirani-Mehr, and Julian Nyarko.

Among recent papers, notable publications include:

  • "Racial disparities in automated speech recognition" (2020) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Who Does What on the Web: A Large-Scale Study of Browsing Behavior" (2021) published in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "The limits of human predictions of recidivism" (2020) published in Science Advances
  • "Legalbench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models" (2023) published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States" (2020) published in Nature Human Behaviour

Best Publications

  • Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption

    Seth Flaxman;Sharad Goel;Justin M. Rao

  • Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness

    Sam Corbett-Davies;Emma Pierson;Avi Feller;Sharad Goel

  • Predicting consumer behavior with Web search

    Sharad Goel;Jake M. Hofman;Sébastien Lahaie;David M. Pennock

  • The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion

    Sharad Goel;Ashton Anderson;Jake M. Hofman;Duncan J. Watts

  • The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness: A Critical Review of Fair Machine Learning.

    Sam Corbett-Davies;Sharad Goel

  • Racial Disparities in Automated Speech Recognition

    Allison Koenecke;Andrew Nam;Emily Lake;Joe Nudell

  • A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States.

    Emma Pierson;Camelia Simoiu;Jan Overgoor;Sam Corbett-Davies

  • The structure of online diffusion networks

    Sharad Goel;Duncan J. Watts;Daniel G. Goldstein

  • Forecasting elections with non-representative polls

    Wei Wang;David Rothschild;Sharad Goel;Andrew Gelman

  • Assessing respondent-driven sampling

    Sharad Goel;Matthew J. Salganik

  • Fair and Balanced? Quantifying Media Bias through Crowdsourced Content Analysis

    Ceren Budak;Sharad Goel;Justin M. Rao

  • Precinct or prejudice? Understanding racial disparities in New York City’s stop-and-frisk policy

    Sharad Goel;Justin M. Rao;Ravi Shroff

  • Real and Perceived Attitude Agreement in Social Networks

    Sharad Goel;Winter Mason;Duncan J. Watts

  • Anatomy of the long tail: ordinary people with extraordinary tastes

    Sharad Goel;Andrei Broder;Evgeniy Gabrilovich;Bo Pang

  • The Problem of Infra-marginality in Outcome Tests for Discrimination

    Camelia Simoiu;Sam Corbett-Davies;Sharad Goel

  • Who Does What on the Web: A Large-Scale Study of Browsing Behavior

    Sharad Goel;Jake M. Hofman;M. Irmak Sirer

  • Predicting Individual Behavior with Social Networks

    Sharad Goel;Daniel G. Goldstein

  • De-anonymizing Web Browsing Data with Social Networks

    Jessica Su;Ansh Shukla;Sharad Goel;Arvind Narayanan

  • The Mythical Swing Voter

    Andrew Gelman;Sharad Goel;Douglas Rivers;David Rothschild

Frequent Co-Authors

Duncan J. Watts
Duncan J. Watts University of Pennsylvania
Daniel G. Goldstein
Daniel G. Goldstein Microsoft (United States)
David M. Pennock
David M. Pennock Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Andrew Gelman
Andrew Gelman Columbia University
Yiling Chen
Yiling Chen Harvard University
John Langford
John Langford Microsoft (United States)
Sergei Vassilvitskii
Sergei Vassilvitskii Google (United States)
Georgios Zervas
Georgios Zervas University College London
Susan Holmes
Susan Holmes Stanford University
Jennifer L. Skeem
Jennifer L. Skeem University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of online degree options and rewarding career paths. For those interested in mental health, accredited counseling programs can lead to roles supporting individuals and communities. To make an informed decision, consider exploring the best online cacrep counseling programs for affordability and accreditation.

If you are drawn to supporting families and relationships, earning a family therapy degree online can prepare you to become a licensed marriage and family therapist. Alternatively, those fascinated by the science of human behavior may pursue online psychology degrees, which can lead to roles in research, counseling, HR, or community outreach.

Social work is another meaningful option with diverse specializations. The easiest online msw program options can help you join the workforce sooner in fields like clinical social work or policy advocacy.

These online programs provide flexibility, affordability, and a path to impactful careers, making them popular choices for students worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Sharad Goel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles