World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
59
Citations
9757
World Ranking
2474
National Ranking
294

Earth Science

D-Index
54
Citations
8838
World Ranking
2754
National Ranking
308

Roger J. Flower publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger J. Flower sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 236 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Roger J. Flower D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger J. Flower sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roger J. Flower is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and primarily conducts research in the field of Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Water Science and Technology, and Biomaterials.

The researcher's work covers a variety of topics, with a focus on Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Diatoms and Algae Research, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics, Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Climate Change Policy and Economics, and Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies.

Roger J. Flower has contributed to multiple publications across various reputable venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Science
  • Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Nature Geoscience
  • Journal of Paleolimnology

Their recent papers illustrate a broad research spectrum and include:

  • Achievements, challenges and global implications of China's carbon neutral pledge (2022, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering)
  • Reverse the hidden loss of China's wetlands (2022, Science)
  • Optimizing safe and just operating spaces at sub-watershed scales to guide local environmental management (2023, Journal of Cleaner Production)
  • Ecological restoration for China's mines (2024, Science)
  • Protect the giant ibis through the pandemic (2020, Science)

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers in their field. Notable coauthors include Julian R. Thompson, Hong Yang (with multiple entries), Xianjin Huang, and Mingguo Ma, reflecting interdisciplinary teamwork in environmental science topics.

Roger J. Flower's academic contributions focus on continually addressing environmental challenges and policy-relevant themes through empirical studies and publication in prominent scientific journals.

Best Publications

  • Historical processes constrain patterns in global diatom diversity.

    Wim Vyverman;Elie Verleyen;Koen Sabbe;Koenraad Vanhoutte

  • Looking forward through the past: Identification of 50 priority research questions in palaeoecology

    Alistair W. R. Seddon;Alistair W. R. Seddon;Anson W. Mackay;Ambroise G. Baker;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks;H. John B. Birks

  • Global change revealed by palaeolimnological records from remote lakes : a review

    Jordi Catalan;Sergi Pla-Rabés;Alexander P. Wolfe;John P. Smol

  • Diatom evidence for recent acidification of two Scottish lochs

    Roger J. Flower;Richard W. Battarbee

  • Lake acidification in Galloway: a palaeoecological test of competing hypotheses

    Richard W. Battarbee;Roger J. Flower;Anthony C. Stevenson;Brian Rippey

  • DIATOM PRESERVATION - EXPERIMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS ON DISSOLUTION AND BREAKAGE IN MODERN AND FOSSIL MATERIAL

    Roger J. Flower

  • The importance of dispersal related and local factors in shaping the taxonomic structure of diatom metacommunities

    Elie Verleyen;Wim Vyverman;Mieke Sterken;Dominic A. Hodgson

  • Waste management, informal recycling, environmental pollution and public health

    Hong Yang;Hong Yang;Mingguo Ma;Julian R Thompson;Roger J Flower

  • The Surface Waters Acidification Project Palaeolimnology Programme: Modern Diatom / Lake-Water Chemistry Data-Set

    AC Stevenson;S Juggins;Hjb Birks;DS Anderson

  • Urban construction and demolition waste and landfill failure in Shenzhen, China

    Hong Yang;Hong Yang;Junqiang Xia;Julian R. Thompson;Roger J. Flower

  • Lake acidification in the United Kingdom 1800-1986

    RW Battarbee;NJ Anderson;PG Appleby;RJ Flower

  • First human impacts and responses of aquatic systems: A review of palaeolimnological records from around the world

    Nathalie Dubois;Nathalie Dubois;Émilie Saulnier-Talbot;Keely Mills;Peter Gell

  • Surface-sediment and epilithic diatom pH calibration sets for remote European mountain lakes (AL:PE Project) and their comparison with the Surface Waters Acidification Programme (SWAP) calibration set

    N. G. Cameron;H. J. B. Birks;H. J. B. Birks;V. J. Jones;F. Berges

  • Biological responses to the chemical recovery of acidified fresh waters in the UK.

    D.T. Monteith;A.G. Hildrew;R.J. Flower;P.J. Raven

  • Decline of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita in Britain: Palaeoecological, documentary and experimental evidence for breeding site acidification

    T.J.C. Beebee;R.J. Flower;A.C. Stevenson;S.T. Patrick

  • Quantitative and qualitative relationships between planktonic diatom communities and diatom assemblages in sedimenting material and surface sediments in Lake Baikal, Siberia

    David B. Ryves;David H. Jewson;Michael Sturm;Richard W. Battarbee

  • Diatom and chemical evidence for reversibility of acidification of Scottish lochs

    R. W. Battarbee;R. J. Flower;A. C. Stevenson;V. J. Jones

  • North African wetland lakes: characterization of nine sites included in the CASSARINA Project

    Mohammed Ramdani;Roger J. Flower;Najat Elkhiati;Mohammed M. Kraïem

  • Environmental characteristics, landscape history and pressures on three coastal lagoons in the Southern Mediterranean Region: Merja Zerga (Morocco), Ghar El Melh (Tunisia) and Lake Manzala (Egypt).

    F. Ayache;J. R. Thompson;R. J. Flower;A. Boujarra

  • Diatom preservation: experiments and observations on dissolution and breakage in modern and fossil material

    Unknown

  • First human impacts and responses of aquatic systems

    Nathalie Dubois;Emilie Saulnier-Talbot;Keely Mills;Peter Gell

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard W. Battarbee
Richard W. Battarbee University College London
Peter G. Appleby
Peter G. Appleby University of Liverpool
Julian R. Thompson
Julian R. Thompson University College London
Hong Yang
Hong Yang University of Reading
Neil L. Rose
Neil L. Rose University College London
Anson W. Mackay
Anson W. Mackay University College London
Vivienne J. Jones
Vivienne J. Jones University College London
Don Monteith
Don Monteith Lancaster University
David B. Ryves
David B. Ryves Loughborough University
Hilary H. Birks
Hilary H. Birks University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As Ecology and Evolution careers continue to evolve, students are increasingly exploring diverse online education pathways. Many professionals are looking to build strong science backgrounds while considering alternative fields such as nursing, public health, and environmental health, which often intersect with ecology principles.

Fast-tracked nursing programs are becoming especially popular. For instance, the rn to bsn in 6 months pathway enables registered nurses to quickly advance their credentials and open doors to new career opportunities. Those with an associate degree may also benefit from asn to np programs, bridging them toward advanced practice roles.

Career changers can also transition into healthcare via online direct entry msn programs, especially beneficial for those coming from a science background. When choosing a school, comparing program quality and flexibility matters. Many students ask which school is better snhu vs wgu to help find the best fit for their goals.

Exploring these online degree and career options provides a versatile foundation for work in ecology, healthcare, or related interdisciplinary fields.

Best Scientists Citing Roger J. Flower

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles