World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
82
Citations
28907
World Ranking
3648
National Ranking
270

Richard W. Farndale publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Farndale sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 311 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard W. Farndale D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard W. Farndale sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard W. Farndale is a researcher affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields, including Hematology, Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Immunology and Allergy, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The research contributions of Richard W. Farndale cover diverse topics. Notable areas of study include:

  • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Blood Properties and Coagulation
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Farndale has contributed to scientific literature published in several journals and venues. Frequent publication targets include:

  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Scientific Reports
  • Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge)

Some of their recent published papers are:

  • THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2021/22: Catalytic receptors (2021), British Journal of Pharmacology
  • The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2023/24: Catalytic receptors (2023), British Journal of Pharmacology
  • Chain alignment of collagen I deciphered using computationally designed heterotrimers (2020), Nature Chemical Biology
  • Platelet-primed interactions of coagulation and anticoagulation pathways in flow-dependent thrombus formation (2020), Scientific Reports
  • Structural insights into collagen binding by platelet receptor glycoprotein VI (2022), Blood

Collaboration appears to be a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Samir W. Hamaia
  • Arkadiusz Bonna
  • Jean-Daniel Malcor
  • Dominique Bihan
  • Ruth E. Cameron

Best Publications

  • Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue

    Richard W. Farndale;David J. Buttle;Alan J. Barrett

  • Structural Basis of Collagen Recognition by Integrin α2β1

    Jonas Emsley;C.Graham Knight;Richard W. Farndale;Michael J. Barnes

  • Platelets Amplify Inflammation in Arthritis via Collagen-Dependent Microparticle Production

    Eric Boilard;Peter A. Nigrovic;Peter A. Nigrovic;Katherine Larabee;Gerald F. M. Watts

  • The Collagen-binding A-domains of Integrins α1β1 and α2β1Recognize the Same Specific Amino Acid Sequence, GFOGER, in Native (Triple-helical) Collagens

    C. Graham Knight;Laurence F. Morton;Anthony R. Peachey;Danny S. Tuckwell

  • Platelets release mitochondria serving as substrate for bactericidal group IIA-secreted phospholipase A2 to promote inflammation

    Luc H. Boudreau;Anne Claire Duchez;Nathalie Cloutier;Denis Soulet

  • The role of collagen in thrombosis and hemostasis.

    R. W. Farndale;J. J. Sixma;M. J. Barnes;P. G. De Groot

  • Evaluation of cell binding to collagen and gelatin: a study of the effect of 2D and 3D architecture and surface chemistry.

    Natalia Davidenko;Carlos F. Schuster;Daniel V. Bax;Richard W. Farndale

  • Integrin alpha 2 beta 1-independent activation of platelets by simple collagen-like peptides: collagen tertiary (triple-helical) and quaternary (polymeric) structures are sufficient alone for alpha 2 beta 1-independent platelet reactivity.

    L F Morton;P G Hargreaves;R W Farndale;R D Young

  • Glycoprotein VI Is a Major Collagen Receptor for Platelet Activation: It Recognizes the Platelet-Activating Quaternary Structure of Collagen, Whereas CD36, Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, and von Willebrand Factor Do Not

    B Kehrel;S Wierwille;K J Clemetson;O Anders

  • Role for p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase in Platelet Aggregation Caused by Collagen or a Thromboxane Analogue

    Jeremy Saklatvala;Lesley Rawlinson;Richard J. Waller;Simon Sarsfield

  • Collagens are functional, high affinity ligands for the inhibitory immune receptor LAIR-1

    Robert Jan Lebbink;Talitha Eshuis-de Ruiter;Jelle Adelmeijer;Arjan B. Brenkman

  • Glycoprotein VI is the collagen receptor in platelets which underlies tyrosine phosphorylation of the Fc receptor γ-chain

    Jonathan M Gibbins;Minoru Okuma;Richard Farndale;Michael Barnes

  • Identification in Collagen Type I of an Integrin α2β1-binding Site Containing an Essential GER Sequence

    C. Graham Knight;Laurence F. Morton;David J. Onley;Anthony R. Peachey

  • Release and activation of platelet latent TGF-beta in blood clots during dissolution with plasmin.

    David J. Grainger;Lalage Wakefield;Hugh W. Bethell;Richard W. Farndale

  • Collagen-platelet interaction: Gly-Pro-Hyp is uniquely specific for platelet Gp VI and mediates platelet activation by collagen.

    C G Knight;L F Morton;D J Onley;A R Peachey

  • Control of crosslinking for tailoring collagen-based scaffolds stability and mechanics

    Natalia Davidenko;CF Schuster;Daniel Bax;N Raynal

  • The exposure of autoantigens by microparticles underlies the formation of potent inflammatory components: the microparticle‐associated immune complexes

    Nathalie Cloutier;Sisareuth Tan;Luc H Boudreau;Catriona Cramb

  • Crosslinking and composition influence the surface properties, mechanical stiffness and cell reactivity of collagen-based films

    Chloe N. Grover;Jessica H. Gwynne;Nicholas Pugh;Samir Hamaia

  • Tyrosine phosphorylation of the Fc receptor gamma-chain in collagen-stimulated platelets.

    Jonathan Gibbins;Judith Asselin;Richard Farndale;Michael Barnes

  • Platelet receptor interplay regulates collagen-induced thrombus formation in flowing human blood

    Pia R.-M. Siljander;Imke C. A. Munnix;Peter A. Smethurst;Hans Deckmyn

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem H. Ouwehand
Willem H. Ouwehand University of Cambridge
Ruth E. Cameron
Ruth E. Cameron University of Cambridge
Stewart O. Sage
Stewart O. Sage University of Cambridge
Serena M. Best
Serena M. Best University of Cambridge
Mike Barnes
Mike Barnes University of Manchester
Nicholas A. Watkins
Nicholas A. Watkins NHS Blood and Transplant
Martin Zeitz
Martin Zeitz Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Steve P. Watson
Steve P. Watson University of Birmingham
Johan W. M. Heemskerk
Johan W. M. Heemskerk Maastricht University
Detlef Schuppan
Detlef Schuppan Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to a range of healthcare careers. Many graduates explore options in health information management, medical coding, or clinical data analysis. If you are interested in blending science with technology, consider pursuing a health information management degree online. These accredited programs offer flexibility and prepare you for management roles in healthcare data.

A popular career path is medical coding. Understanding the difference between ccs vs cpc certification can help you choose the best certification for your goals, as each offers unique benefits and job prospects. Certified professionals often have solid earning potential; you can learn more about the certified medical coder salary and required qualifications before starting your journey.

The healthcare industry continues to evolve, making data-driven roles increasingly important. If you are concerned about long-term job security, explore whether is medical coding a dying career. Overall, a background in biology and biochemistry combined with health information training can lead to fulfilling and stable career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Richard W. Farndale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles