World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
61
Citations
13100
World Ranking
2780
National Ranking
216

Ondřej Mašek publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ondřej Mašek sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ondřej Mašek D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ondřej Mašek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ondřej Mašek is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research work spans multiple areas within environmental science and engineering, with a particular focus on biomass conversion, pollutant removal, and nutrient management.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

They have contributed to several subfields, such as:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Pollution
  • Mechanical Engineering

Primary research topics addressed by Ondřej Mašek include:

  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Coal and Its By-products
  • Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
  • Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Their recent papers cover significant aspects of environmental technology and sustainable processes. Notable publications include:

  • Evaluating biochar and its modifications for the removal of ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate in water (2020, Water Research)
  • Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China's 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals (2021, Nature Communications)
  • New trends in biochar pyrolysis and modification strategies: feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, sustainability concerns and implications for soil amendment (2020, Soil Use and Management)
  • A meta-analysis on biochar's effects on soil water properties - New insights and future research challenges (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes (2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews)

Mašek frequently collaborates with a number of researchers, including:

  • Christian Wurzer
  • Yong Sik Ok
  • Daniel C.W. Tsang
  • Wolfram Buss
  • Frederik Ronsse

The venues where their work appears most frequently reflect their focus on environmental and chemical engineering disciplines. These publication venues include:

  • Bioresource Technology
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • Chemical Engineering Journal

Best Publications

  • Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures.

    Ling Zhao;Xinde Cao;Ondřej Mašek;Andrew Zimmerman

  • The effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar stability as determined by three methods

    Kyle Crombie;Ondřej Mašek;Saran P. Sohi;Peter Brownsort

  • Evaluating biochar and its modifications for the removal of ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate in water

    Ming Zhang;Ge Song;Danielle L. Gelardi;Longbin Huang

  • A critical review of clay-based composites with enhanced adsorption performance for metal and organic pollutants.

    Huawen Han;Muhammad Khalid Rafiq;Tuoyu Zhou;Rong Xu

  • Influence of production conditions on the yield and environmental stability of biochar

    Ondřej Mašek;Peter Brownsort;Andrew Cross;Saran Sohi

  • Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China's 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals.

    Qing Yang;Hewen Zhou;Pietro Bartocci;Francesco Fantozzi

  • New trends in biochar pyrolysis and modification strategies: feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, sustainability concerns and implications for soil amendment

    Liuwei Wang;Yong Sik Ok;Daniel C. W. Tsang;Daniel S. Alessi

  • Indispensable role of biochar-inherent mineral constituents in its environmental applications: A review

    Xiaoyun Xu;Yinghao Zhao;Jingke Sima;Ling Zhao

  • A meta-analysis on biochar's effects on soil water properties - New insights and future research challenges.

    Ifeoma G. Edeh;Ondřej Mašek;Wolfram Buss

  • Microwave and Slow Pyrolysis Biochar – Comparison of Physical and Functional Properties

    Ondřej Mašek;Vitaly Budarin;Mark Gronnow;Kyle Crombie

  • Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes

    Marco Chiappero;Omid Norouzi;Mingyu Hu;Francesca Demichelis

  • A state-of-the-art review on algae pyrolysis for bioenergy and biochar production.

    Jiacheng Sun;Omid Norouzi;Ondřej Mašek

  • Mobile organic compounds in biochar – A potential source of contamination – Phytotoxic effects on cress seed (Lepidium sativum) germination

    Wolfram Buss;Ondřej Mašek

  • Inherent organic compounds in biochar--Their content, composition and potential toxic effects.

    Wolfram Buss;Ondřej Mašek;Margaret Graham;Dominik Wüst

  • Dual Functionality of TiO2/Biochar Hybrid Materials: Photocatalytic Phenol Degradation in the Liquid Phase and Selective Oxidation of Methanol in the Gas Phase

    Paweł Lisowski;Juan Carlos Colmenares;Ondřej Mašek;Wojciech Lisowski

  • Roles of Phosphoric Acid in Biochar Formation: Synchronously Improving Carbon Retention and Sorption Capacity.

    Ling Zhao;Wei Zheng;Ondřej Mašek;Xiang Chen

  • Biochar composites: Emerging trends, field successes and sustainability implications

    Liuwei Wang;Yong Sik Ok;Daniel C.W. Tsang;Daniel S. Alessi

  • Pyrolysis biochar systems, balance between bioenergy and carbon sequestration

    Kyle Crombie;Ondřej Mašek

  • Country-level potential of carbon sequestration and environmental benefits by utilizing crop residues for biochar implementation

    Qiushuang Yang;Ondřej Mašek;Ling Zhao;Hongyan Nan

  • Suitability of marginal biomass-derived biochars for soil amendment

    Wolfram Buss;Margaret C. Graham;Jessica G. Shepherd;Ondřej Mašek

  • An assessment of the benefits and issues associated with the application of biochar to soil

    Peter Brownsort;Sarah Carter;Jason Cook;Colin Cunningham

  • Strategies for producing biochars with minimum PAH contamination

    Wolfram Buss;Margaret C. Graham;Gillian MacKinnon;Ondřej Mašek

Frequent Co-Authors

Saran Sohi
Saran Sohi University of Edinburgh
Frederik Ronsse
Frederik Ronsse Ghent University
Jun-ichiro Hayashi
Jun-ichiro Hayashi Kyushu University
Yong Sik Ok
Yong Sik Ok Korea University
Franco Berruti
Franco Berruti University of Western Ontario
Xinde Cao
Xinde Cao Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Ling Zhao
Ling Zhao Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Erik Meers
Erik Meers Ghent University
Daniel C.W. Tsang
Daniel C.W. Tsang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Jörg Rinklebe
Jörg Rinklebe University of Wuppertal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that intersect with various disciplines. For example, professionals skilled in spatial analysis often pursue gis degree programs. These programs train students to use Geographic Information Systems for environmental mapping, resource management, and urban planning, enhancing their ability to address ecological challenges through technology.

For those interested in policy and administration roles related to environmental governance, an online mpa degrees provide specialized training in public administration. These fast-tracked programs prepare graduates to lead sustainable initiatives within government agencies or nonprofit organizations.

Understanding human behavior and societal impact on the environment is also crucial. Pursuing one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs can equip students with insights into social dynamics, aiding in the design of effective environmental campaigns and policies.

For educators and professionals seeking advanced credentials without the traditional research hurdles, edd no dissertation programs offer a practical route to doctorate degrees. These are ideal for those aiming to integrate environmental science into educational leadership or community advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Ondřej Mašek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles