World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
97
Citations
26010
World Ranking
1781
National Ranking
983

Richard L. Stevens publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Stevens sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 380 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard L. Stevens D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Stevens sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard L. Stevens is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their work contributes to the scientific community through involvement in medical and clinical research based at this institution.

No data is provided regarding specific publications, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with this scientist. Similarly, there is no information on book publications, main or subfields of study, research topics, or awards related to Richard L. Stevens.

The information available focuses solely on their primary institutional affiliation, indicating active engagement in a professional medical research environment. No additional details about their research specialties or academic output are given.

Best Publications

  • The Importance of Diagnostic Cytogenetics on Outcome in AML: Analysis of 1,612 Patients Entered Into the MRC AML 10 Trial

    David Grimwade;Helen Walker;Fiona Oliver;Keith Wheatley

  • Human eosinophils have prolonged survival, enhanced functional properties, and become hypodense when exposed to human interleukin 3.

    M E Rothenberg;W F Owen;D S Silberstein;J Woods

  • Heparin is essential for the storage of specific granule proteases in mast cells

    Donald E. Humphries;Guang W. Wong;Daniel S. Friend;Michael F. Gurish

  • Recent advances in the cellular and molecular biology of mast cells

    Richard L. Stevens;K. Frank Austen

  • Interleukin 3: A differentiation and growth factor for the mouse mast cell that contains chondroitin sulfate E proteoglycan.

    E Razin;J N Ihle;D Seldin;J M Mencia-Huerta

  • Regulation of human eosinophil viability, density, and function by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the presence of 3T3 fibroblasts.

    W F Owen;M E Rothenberg;D S Silberstein;J C Gasson

  • Coculture of interleukin 3-dependent mouse mast cells with fibroblasts results in a phenotypic change of the mast cells.

    F Levi-Schaffer;K F Austen;P M Gravallese;R L Stevens

  • IL-5-dependent conversion of normodense human eosinophils to the hypodense phenotype uses 3T3 fibroblasts for enhanced viability, accelerated hypodensity, and sustained antibody-dependent cytotoxicity.

    M E Rothenberg;J Petersen;R L Stevens;D S Silberstein

  • Human ecalectin, a variant of human galectin-9, is a novel eosinophil chemoattractant produced by T lymphocytes

    Ryoji Matsumoto;Hiroyuki Matsumoto;Masako Seki;Mitsumi Hata

  • Culture from mouse bone marrow of a subclass of mast cells possessing a distinct chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan with glycosaminoglycans rich in N-acetylgalactosamine-4,6-disulfate.

    E Razin;R L Stevens;F Akiyama;K Schmid

  • Cooperative and antagonistic interplay between PU.1 and GATA-2 in the specification of myeloid cell fates.

    Jonathan C Walsh;Rodney P DeKoter;Hyun Jun Lee;Erica D Smith

  • Mast cells that reside at different locations in the jejunum of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis exhibit sequential changes in their granule ultrastructure and chymase phenotype.

    D S Friend;N Ghildyal;K F Austen;M F Gurish

  • Homology of the rat basophilic leukemia cell and the rat mucosal mast cell.

    D C Seldin;S Adelman;K F Austen;R L Stevens

  • A new short-term mouse model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identifies a role for mast cell tryptase in pathogenesis

    Emma L. Beckett;Richard L. Stevens;Richard L. Stevens;Andrew G. Jarnicki;Richard Y. Kim

  • Natural history of GATA1 mutations in Down syndrome

    Momin Ahmed;Alexander Sternberg;Georgina Hall;Angela Thomas

  • Interleukin 5 and phenotypically altered eosinophils in the blood of patients with the idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

    W F Owen;M E Rothenberg;J Petersen;P F Weller

  • IgE-mediated release of leukotriene C4, chondroitin sulfate E proteoglycan, beta-hexosaminidase, and histamine from cultured bone marrow-derived mouse mast cells.

    E. Razin;J. M. Mencia-Huerta;R. L. Stevens;R. A. Lewis

  • Differential expression of secretory granule proteases in mouse mast cells exposed to interleukin 3 and c-kit ligand.

    M F Gurish;N Ghildyal;H P McNeil;K F Austen

  • Different mouse mast cell populations express various combinations of at least six distinct mast cell serine proteases.

    D S Reynolds;R L Stevens;W S Lane;M H Carr

  • Induction of a Selective and Persistent Extravasation of Neutrophils into the Peritoneal Cavity by Tryptase Mouse Mast Cell Protease 6

    Chifu Huang;Daniel S. Friend;Wen Tao Qiu;Guang W. Wong

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael F. Gurish
Michael F. Gurish Harvard Medical School
Steven A. Krilis
Steven A. Krilis University of New South Wales
Daniel S. Friend
Daniel S. Friend Brigham and Women's Hospital
K. Frank Austen
K. Frank Austen Brigham and Women's Hospital
Francesca Levi-Schaffer
Francesca Levi-Schaffer Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Andrej Sali
Andrej Sali University of California, San Francisco
Marc E. Rothenberg
Marc E. Rothenberg Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
David C. Seldin
David C. Seldin Boston University
Kym F. Faull
Kym F. Faull University of California, Los Angeles
Shalom Avraham
Shalom Avraham Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens up a range of flexible online degree and career options in the USA. Many students interested in healthcare may start by becoming a Medical Assistant, and then advance through a medical assistant to lpn bridge program online. This pathway helps build clinical skills while giving a solid foundation for further nursing roles.

For those interested in a broader science background, online biology degrees offer accelerated options that make it easier to balance studies with personal or work commitments. These programs cover areas from genetics to ecology, providing vital knowledge for lab, research, or teaching careers.

If a direct path to patient care is your goal, an online asn degree qualifies graduates to take the NCLEX-RN and start work as registered nurses. This flexible approach suits career changers and working adults.

Meanwhile, nutrition remains a growing field. The best online nutrition programs combine biology, chemistry, and public health, preparing students for roles in dietary planning, wellness coaching, or food science.

These online pathways make science careers more accessible than ever before—helping you shape a future in health, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Stevens

Trending Scientists