World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 58 4172 3826 1889 1703 124 11975

Po H. Lu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Po H. Lu between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Po H. Lu published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2012. 2 of the 126 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2012. 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1999 2025

126 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Po H. Lu: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 4
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 4
2005 5
2006 7
2007 9
2008 5
2009 11
2010 10
2011 12
2012 13
2013 10
2014 7
2015 2
2016 4
2017 5
2018 1
2019 4
2020 3
2021 3
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 2
Total 126
Download as CSV

Po H. Lu publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Po H. Lu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 124 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 124
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Po H. Lu D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Po H. Lu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334 58
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Po H. Lu is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles, and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research centers on topics such as Data-Driven Disease Surveillance, Public Health Policies and Education, and Zoonotic diseases and public health.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Po H. Lu include:

  • "Time-Lapse Mapping of Cortical Changes in Schizophrenia with Different Treatments," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "Yao Ying's Theory of 'Literary Value and Depression'," 2023, The Journal of Chinese Prose
  • "CalCORVID: A Dynamic RShiny Dashboard Approach to Visualize Spatiotemporal Clusters for Public Health Surveillance," 2025, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Keeping a modeling-driven public health dashboard relevant-lessons learned from the California Communicable diseases Assessment Tool," 2025, Frontiers in Public Health

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Tomás M. León
  • Lauren A. White
  • Paul M. Thompson
  • George Bartzokis
  • Kiralee M. Hayashi

Po H. Lu's publications have appeared in venues such as UNC Libraries, The Journal of Chinese Prose, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Frontiers in Public Health.

Best Publications

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Age-related changes in frontal and temporal lobe volumes in men: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

    George Bartzokis;Mace Beckson;Po H. Lu;Keith H. Nuechterlein

  • Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: implications for cortical "disconnection" in aging and Alzheimer's disease.

    George Bartzokis;George Bartzokis;David Sultzer;David Sultzer;Po H Lu;Po H Lu;Keith H Nuechterlein

  • Brain ferritin iron may influence age- and gender-related risks of neurodegeneration.

    George Bartzokis;George Bartzokis;Todd A. Tishler;Todd A. Tishler;Po H. Lu;Po H. Lu;Pablo Villablanca

  • Functional brain architecture is associated with the rate of tau accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Lifespan trajectory of myelin integrity and maximum motor speed

    George Bartzokis;George Bartzokis;Po H. Lu;Kathleen Tingus;Mario F. Mendez;Mario F. Mendez

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of Various Digit Span Scores in the Detection of Suspect Effort

    Talin Babikian;Kyle Brauer Boone;Po Lu;Ginger Arnold

  • Myelin breakdown and iron changes in Huntington's disease: pathogenesis and treatment implications.

    George Bartzokis;Po H. Lu;Todd A. Tishler;Sophia M. Fong

  • Increased iron levels and decreased tissue integrity in hippocampus of Alzheimer's disease detected in vivo with magnetic resonance imaging.

    Erika P Raven;Po H Lu;Todd A Tishler;Panthea Heydari

  • Neuropsychiatric symptoms are associated with progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease.

    Edmond Teng;Po H. Lu;Jeffrey L. Cummings

  • Brain Ferritin Iron as a Risk Factor for Age at Onset in Neurodegenerative Diseases

    George Bartzokis;Todd A. Tishler;Todd A. Tishler;Il Seon Shin;Il Seon Shin;Po H. Lu

  • Effects of Testosterone on Cognition and Mood in Male Patients With Mild Alzheimer Disease and Healthy Elderly Men

    Po H. Lu;Donna A. Masterman;Ruth Mulnard;Carl Cotman

  • Adjunctive risperidone in the treatment of chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder.

    George Bartzokis;George Bartzokis;Po H. Lu;Po H. Lu;Jana Turner;Jim Mintz;Jim Mintz

  • Utility of the functional activities questionnaire for distinguishing mild cognitive impairment from very mild Alzheimer disease.

    Edmond Teng;Brian W. Becker;Ellen Woo;David S. Knopman

  • Human brain myelination and amyloid beta deposition in Alzheimer’s disease

    George Bartzokis;Po H. Lu;Po H. Lu;Jim Mintz

  • Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging assessment of white matter aging trajectories over the lifespan of healthy individuals.

    George Bartzokis;George Bartzokis;Po H. Lu;Panthea Heydari;Alexander Couvrette

  • Depressive Symptoms in Mild Cognitive Impairment Predict Greater Atrophy in Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Regions

    Grace J. Lee;Po H. Lu;Xue Hua;Suh Lee

  • Reduced Quality of Life Ratings in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Analyses of Subject and Informant Responses

    Edmond Teng;Edmond Teng;Kanida Tassniyom;Po H. Lu

  • Time-Lapse Mapping of Cortical Changes in Schizophrenia with Different Treatments

    Paul M. Thompson;George Bartzokis;Kiralee M. Hayashi;Andrea D. Klunder

  • Apolipoprotein E genotype and age-related myelin breakdown in healthy individuals: Implications for cognitive decline and dementia

    George Bartzokis;Po H. Lu;Daniel H. Geschwind;Nancy Edwards

  • Abstinence from Cocaine Reduces High-Risk Responses on a Gambling Task

    George Bartzokis;Po H Lu;Po H Lu;Mace Beckson;Mace Beckson;Ruth Rapoport

  • Age-related slowing in cognitive processing speed is associated with myelin integrity in a very healthy elderly sample

    Po H. Lu;Grace J. Lee;Erika P. Raven;Kathleen Tingus

Frequent Co-Authors

George Bartzokis
George Bartzokis University of California, Los Angeles
Jim Mintz
Jim Mintz The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Jeffrey L. Cummings
Jeffrey L. Cummings University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Lori L. Altshuler
Lori L. Altshuler University of California, Los Angeles
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Mario F. Mendez
Mario F. Mendez University of California, Los Angeles
Keith H. Nuechterlein
Keith H. Nuechterlein University of California, Los Angeles
Liana G. Apostolova
Liana G. Apostolova Indiana University
Daniel H. Geschwind
Daniel H. Geschwind University of California, Los Angeles
Kenneth L. Subotnik
Kenneth L. Subotnik University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience is closely linked to several fields in psychology, social work, and therapy. If you’re considering expanding your expertise through an online degree, there are many flexible and cost-effective options to explore.

For those interested in mental health counseling, mft masters programs provide specialized training to become a marriage and family therapist. Similarly, an affordable online psychology masters can offer deeper insight into human behavior and open doors to a broad range of psychology careers.

If you are just getting started or seeking foundational knowledge, there are accredited and psychology degrees available online to match different interests and budgets. Alternatively, for those drawn to social work, you may wonder how long does it take to get a msw online; timelines can vary based on program structure and your pace.

Whether your goal is research, therapy, or clinical practice, these online pathways can help you advance your neuroscience career or transition to a complementary role in the behavioral sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Po H. Lu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles