World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Philip Rubin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip Rubin between 1959 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip Rubin published across 65 years, from 1959 to 2023, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 1977. 7 of the 625 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 1977. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 3 publications 1962: 3 publications 1963: 4 publications 1964: 3 publications 1965: 17 publications 1966: 14 publications 1967: 13 publications 1968: 19 publications 1969: 17 publications 1970: 6 publications 1971: 12 publications 1972: 12 publications 1973: 9 publications 1974: 16 publications 1975: 10 publications 1976: 15 publications 1977: 26 publications 1978: 14 publications 1979: 13 publications 1980: 16 publications 1981: 22 publications 1982: 14 publications 1983: 15 publications 1984: 25 publications 1985: 15 publications 1986: 15 publications 1987: 16 publications 1988: 22 publications 1989: 21 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 17 publications 1993: 22 publications 1994: 24 publications 1995: 25 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 6 publications
1959 2023

625 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip Rubin: publications per year, 1959 to 2023
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 3
1962 3
1963 4
1964 3
1965 17
1966 14
1967 13
1968 19
1969 17
1970 6
1971 12
1972 12
1973 9
1974 16
1975 10
1976 15
1977 26
1978 14
1979 13
1980 16
1981 22
1982 14
1983 15
1984 25
1985 15
1986 15
1987 16
1988 22
1989 21
1990 15
1991 13
1992 17
1993 22
1994 24
1995 25
1996 22
1997 5
1998 8
1999 8
2000 1
2001 2
2002 13
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 5
2009 1
2010 6
2011 0
2012 3
2013 3
2014 5
2015 0
2016 1
2017 2
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 1
2023 6
Total 625
Download as CSV

Philip Rubin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Rubin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip Rubin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Rubin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip Rubin was affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. Their research work spanned several interconnected areas primarily within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist contributed to multiple topics throughout their career. These included:

  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research

Among the most recent papers authored or coauthored by Philip Rubin were:

  • Clinical Determinants Differentiating the Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients: Hospital Care or Home Recovery, 2021, published in Frontiers in Medicine
  • Arthur Abramson, 2022, published in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics

Frequent coauthors who collaborated with them include:

  • Dong D. Lin
  • Yunhong Wu
  • Sudhamshi Toom
  • Niki Sheth
  • Kevin Becker

The scholar's research was disseminated in venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Medicine
  • Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics

Their interdisciplinary work combined clinical research related to COVID-19 with language and phonetics research, reflecting a range that covers both health sciences and cognitive studies. The publications indicate an involvement in clinical research addressing the severity of COVID-19 infections among vulnerable populations, as well as contributions to linguistic encyclopedias.

Best Publications

  • CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment.

    Andy Trotti;A.Dimitrios Colevas;Ann Setser;Valerie Rusch

  • Long‐term observations of the patterns of failure in patients with unresectable non‐oat cell carcinoma of the lung treated with definitive radiotherapy report by the radiation therapy oncology group

    Carlos A. Perez;Thomas F. Pajak;Philip Rubin;Joseph R. Simpson

  • Hypothalamic-Pituitary Dysfunction After Radiation for Brain Tumors

    Louis S. Constine;Paul D. Woolf;Donald Cann;Gail Mick

  • Androgen deprivation with radiation therapy compared with radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostatic carcinoma: a randomized comparative trial of the radiation therapy oncology group

    Miljenko V. Pilepich;William T. Sause;William U. Shipley;John M. Krall

  • A prospective randomized study of various irradiation doses and fractionation schedules in the treatment of inoperable non-oat-cell carcinoma of the lung. Preliminary report by the radiation therapy oncology group

    C. A. Perez;K. Stanley;P. Rubin;S. Kramer

  • Long-term treatment sequelae following external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG studies 7506 and 7706

    Colleen A. Lawton;Minhee Won;Miljenko V. Pilepich;Sucha O. Asbell

  • Impact of irradiation technique and tumor extent in tumor control and survival of patients with unresectable non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung: report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

    Carlos A. Perez;Kenneth Stanley;Graham Grundy;William Hanson

  • Injury to the lung from cancer therapy: Clinical syndromes, measurable endpoints, and potential scoring systems

    Sandra McDonald;Philip Rubin;Theodore L. Phillips;Lawrence B. Marks

  • RTOG Late Effects Working Group. Overview. Late Effects of Normal Tissues (LENT) scoring system.

    Philip Rubin;Louis S. Constine;Luis F. Fajardo;Theodore L. Phillips

  • Radiation pneumonitis and early circulatory cytokine markers

    Yuhchyau Chen;Jacqueline Williams;Ivan Ding;Eric Hernady

  • Adverse effects of brain irradiation correlated with MR and CT imaging.

    L.S. Constine;A. Konski;S. Ekholm;S. McDonald

  • Quality assurance problems in clinical hyperthermia and their impact on therapeutic outcome: A report by the radiation therapy oncology group

    Carlos A. Perez;Brenda Gillespie;Thomas Pajak;Ned B. Hornback

  • Early and persistent alterations in the expression of interleukin-1 alpha, interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA levels in fibrosis-resistant and sensitive mice after thoracic irradiation.

    Carl J. Johnston;Bruno Piedboeuf;Philip Rubin;Jacqueline P. Williams

  • Improved survival in cases of intracranial ependymoma after radiation therapy. Late report and recommendations.

    Omar M. Salazar;Hernan Castro-Vita;Paul VanHoutte;Philip Rubin

  • Randomized phase III study comparing irradiation and hyperthermia with irradiation alone in superficial measurable tumors. Final report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

    Carlos A. Perez;Thomas Pajak;Bahman Emami;Ned B. Hornback

  • Elapsed treatment days--a critical item for radiotherapy quality control review in head and neck trials: RTOG report.

    Thomas F. Pajak;George E. Laramore;Victor A. Marcial;John T. Fazekas

  • Disruption of the blood-brain barrier as the primary effect of CNS irradiation.

    P. Rubin;D.M. Gash;J.T. Hansen;D.F. Nelson

  • Phase III study of interstitial thermoradiotherapy compared with interstitial radiotherapy alone in the treatment of recurrent or persistent human tumors: A prospectively controlled randomized study by the radiation therapy oncology group

    Bahman Emami;Charles Scott;Carlos A. Perez;Sucha Asbell

  • Symptomatic coronary artery disease after mantle irradiation for Hodgkin's disease

    Vernon King;Louis S. Constine;Douglas Clark;Ronald G. Schwartz

  • Correlation of radiotherapeutic parameters and treatment related morbidity--analysis of RTOG Study 77-06

    M.V. Pilepich;S.O. Asbell;J.M. Krall;W.H. Baerwald

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis S. Constine
Louis S. Constine University of Rochester Medical Center
Paul Okunieff
Paul Okunieff University of Florida
Carlos A. Perez
Carlos A. Perez The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Thomas F. Pajak
Thomas F. Pajak RTOG Foundation
James D. Cox
James D. Cox The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Theodore L. Phillips
Theodore L. Phillips University of California, San Francisco
Walter J. Curran
Walter J. Curran Emory University
John M. Bennett
John M. Bennett University of Rochester Medical Center
Harry Bartelink
Harry Bartelink Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in medicine, but looking for flexible study options? There are a range of online degrees and certification programs related to healthcare that can open doors to dynamic careers. For example, pharm d online programs offer an accessible way for students to become practicing pharmacists while balancing work and personal commitments.

If you are passionate about data and healthcare management, earning a bachelor of health information management online can prepare you for roles in organizing and securing patient information within medical facilities.

For those seeking a quicker entry into the healthcare field, exploring medical billing and coding online courses cost can provide valuable training for administrative positions supporting hospitals and clinics.

Finally, for registered nurses aiming to advance their careers, the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs can help you achieve advanced clinical skills and greater responsibility in patient care settings.

These online programs give you the opportunity to grow your skills, increase your job prospects, and make an impact in healthcare—all while studying on your own terms.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Rubin

Recently Published Articles