World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
34690
World Ranking
7119
National Ranking
3740

Steven A. Leibel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Leibel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 293 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven A. Leibel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Leibel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven A. Leibel was affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States during their career.

The scientist did not have recorded recent papers or co-author collaborations listed in the available data.

No data was provided regarding main or subfields of study, and there were no mentions of specific research topics associated with their work.

There were no publication venues or book publications attributed to Steven A. Leibel in the provided information.

The available records did not indicate any awards or honors received during their professional life.

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

    Gerald J. Kutcher;Lawrence Coia;Michael Gillin;William F. Hanson

  • Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality.

    C.Clifton Ling;John Humm;Steven Larson;Howard Amols

  • Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer.

    Michael J. Zelefsky;Steven A. Leibel;Paul Gaudin;Gerald J. Kutcher

  • High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients

    Michael J Zelefsky;Zvi Fuks;Margie Hunt;Yoshiya Yamada

  • HIGH DOSE RADIATION DELIVERED BY INTENSITY MODULATED CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY IMPROVES THE OUTCOME OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER

    Michael J. Zelefsky;Zvi Fuks;Margie Hunt;Henry J. Lee

  • Deep inspiration breath-hold technique for lung tumors: the potential value of target immobilization and reduced lung density in dose escalation ☆

    Joseph Hanley;Marc M. Debois;Dennis Mah;Gikas S. Mageras

  • Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

    Hedvig Hricak;Peter L. Choyke;Steven C. Eberhardt;Steven A. Leibel

  • Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer.

    Michael J Zelefsky;Zvi Fuks;Laura Happersett;Henry J Lee

  • Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

    Andrew J. Stephenson;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Michael J. Zelefsky;Michael W. Kattan

  • Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Prognostic Model

    Lauren E. Abrey;Leah Ben-Porat;Katherine S. Panageas;Joachim Yahalom

  • The effect of local control on metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the prostate: Long-term results in patients treated with 1251 implantation

    Zvi Fuks;Steven A. Leibel;Kent E. Wallner;Colin B. Begg

  • The deep inspiration breath-hold technique in the treatment of inoperable non–small-cell lung cancer

    Kenneth E Rosenzweig;Joseph Hanley;Dennis Mah;Gig Mageras

  • Second malignancies in patients who have head and neck cancer: incidence, effect on survival and implications based on the RTOG experience.

    Jay S. Cooper;Thomas F. Pajak;Philip Rubin;Leslie Tupchong

  • Chemotherapy without irradiation--a novel approach for newly diagnosed CNS germ cell tumors: results of an international cooperative trial. The First International Central Nervous System Germ Cell Tumor Study.

    C Balmaceda;G Heller;M Rosenblum;B Diez

  • Late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer (I): multivariate analysis and dose-response.

    Mark W Skwarchuk;Andrew Jackson;Michael J Zelefsky;Ennapadam S Venkatraman

  • Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation.

    C.Clifton Ling;Chandra Burman;Chen S. Chui;Gerald J. Kutcher

  • Comparison of the 5-Year Outcome and Morbidity of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Versus Transperineal Permanent Iodine-125 Implantation for Early-Stage Prostatic Cancer

    Michael J. Zelefsky;Kent E. Wallner;C. Clifton Ling;Adam Raben

  • Technical aspects of the deep inspiration breath-hold technique in the treatment of thoracic cancer

    Dennis Mah;Joseph Hanley;Kenneth E Rosenzweig;Ellen Yorke

  • Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.

    Chandra Burman;Chen-Shou Chui;Gerald Kutcher;Steven Leibel

  • Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

    Peter R. Carroll

Frequent Co-Authors

Zvi Fuks
Zvi Fuks Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael J. Zelefsky
Michael J. Zelefsky Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
C. Clifton Ling
C. Clifton Ling Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Radhe Mohan
Radhe Mohan The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Louis B. Harrison
Louis B. Harrison Moffitt Cancer Center
Philip H. Gutin
Philip H. Gutin Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael W. Kattan
Michael W. Kattan Cleveland Clinic
Howard I. Scher
Howard I. Scher Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Peter T. Scardino
Peter T. Scardino Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mark G. Kris
Mark G. Kris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary pathways in healthcare can open new doors for students interested in medicine. Today, online degree programs offer flexible options that fit various career goals, schedules, and budgets.

For those looking to work behind the scenes, medical billing and coding online courses offer an accessible entry point into healthcare administration without requiring years of clinical training.

Aspiring nurses can take advantage of affordable nursing programs online, allowing them to earn an accredited nursing degree from home. For those wanting to advance their nursing credentials, there are cheapest nurse practitioner programs available entirely online, letting students progress to leadership roles and provide advanced patient care.

Ambitious professionals interested in research and academia can pursue a phd in nursing with the convenience of online learning, making high-level education more accessible than ever.

Whether you’re considering clinical or non-clinical roles, these flexible and affordable pathways provide meaningful opportunities to join and advance in the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Steven A. Leibel

Recently Published Articles