World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
10503
World Ranking
3144
National Ranking
1217

Philip M. Jardine publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Jardine sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Philip M. Jardine D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Jardine sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip M. Jardine was affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their academic career was oriented within this institution, contributing to the broader scientific community through research activity.

There is no available record of their recent papers, frequent co-authors, or primary publication venues. Similarly, details about book publications, main fields or subfields of study, and specific topics of work have not been documented in the accessible data.

Due to the absence of detailed publication and research information, there are no enumerated titles of papers, documented co-authors, or named fields of research to list.

Philip M. Jardine is recorded as deceased. No awards or honors have been registered in the available source data. The overview relies exclusively on the confirmed details of institutional affiliation and the status of the researcher.

Best Publications

  • Pilot-scale in situ bioremedation of uranium in a highly contaminated aquifer. 2. Reduction of u(VI) and geochemical control of u(VI) bioavailability.

    Wei-Min Wu;Jack Carley;Terry Gentry;Matthew A. Ginder-Vogel

  • Fate and Transport of Hexavalent Chromium in Undisturbed Heterogeneous Soil

    P. M. Jardine;S. E. Fendorf;M. A. Mayes;I. L. Larsen

  • Using soil physical and chemical properties to estimate bulk density

    Sonja A. Heuscher;Craig C. Brandt;Philip M. Jardine

  • Physical and chemical controls of preferred path flow through a forested hillslope

    R.J. Luxmoore;P.M. Jardine;G.V. Wilson;J.R. Jones

  • U(VI) Adsorption to Heterogeneous Subsurface Media: Application of a Surface Complexation Model

    Mark O Barnett;Philip M Jardine;Scott C Brooks

  • Dominance of sulfur-fueled iron oxide reduction in low-sulfate freshwater sediments.

    Colleen M Hansel;Chris J Lentini;Yuanzhi Tang;David T Johnston

  • Adsorption, sequestration, and bioaccessibility of As(V) in soils.

    Jae-Kyu Yang;Mark O Barnett;Philip M Jardine;Nicholas T Basta

  • Enhancement of Carbon Sequestration in US Soils

    Wilfred M. Post;R. Cesar Izaurralde;Julie D. Jastrow;Bruce A. McCARL

  • Hydrogeochemical Response of a Forested Watershed to Storms: Effects of Preferential Flow Along Shallow and Deep Pathways

    Patrick J. Mulholland;Glenn V. Wilson;Philip M. Jardine

  • In situ bioreduction of uranium (VI) to submicromolar levels and reoxidation by dissolved oxygen.

    Weimin Wu;Jack M Carley;Jian Luo;Matthew A. Ginder-Vogel

  • Unsaturated Transport Processes in Undisturbed Heterogeneous Porous Media: II. Co-Contaminants

    P. M. Jardine;G. K. Jacobs;G. V. Wilson

  • Potassium-Calcium Exchange in a Multireactive Soil System: I. Kinetics

    P. M. Jardine;D. L. Sparks

  • A multiple-pore-region concept to modeling mass transfer in subsurface media

    J.P. Gwo;P.M. Jardine;G.V. Wilson;G.T. Yeh

  • Sorption and binary exchange of nitrate, sulfate, and uranium on an anion-exchange resin.

    Baohua Gu;Yee-Kyoung Ku;Philip M. Jardine

  • Pilot-scale in situ bioremediation of uranium in a highly contaminated aquifer. 1. Conditioning of a treatment zone.

    Wei-Min Wu;Jack Carley;Michael Fienen;Tonia Mehlhorn

  • Microbial Communities in Contaminated Sediments, Associated with Bioremediation of Uranium to Submicromolar Levels

    Erick Cardenas;Weimin Wu;Mary Beth Leigh;Jack M Carley

  • Mobility of natural organic matter in a study aquifer

    John F. McCarthy;Thomas M. Williams;Liyuan Liang;Philip M. Jardine

  • Mobilization of transuranic radionuclides from disposal trenches by natural organic matter

    John F McCarthy;Kenneth R Czerwinski;William E Sanford;Philip M Jardine

  • Transport of Naturally Occurring Dissolved Organic Carbon in Laboratory Columns Containing Aquifer Material

    F. M. Dunnivant;P. M. Jardine;D. L. Taylor;J. F. McCarthy

  • Bioreduction of Uranium in a Contaminated Soil Column

    Baohua Gu;Wei-Min Wu;Matthew A Ginder-Vogel;Hui Yan

  • Denitrifying Bacteria Isolated from Terrestrial Subsurface Sediments Exposed to Mixed-Waste Contamination

    Stefan J. Green;Om Prakash;Thomas M. Gihring;Denise M. Akob

  • Cotransport of cadmium and hexachlorobiphenyl by dissolved organic carbon through columns containing aquifer material

    Frank M. Dunnivant;Philip M. Jardine;David L. Taylor;John F. McCarthy

  • Significant Association between Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria and Uranium-Reducing Microbial Communities as Revealed by a Combined Massively Parallel Sequencing-Indicator Species Approach

    Erick Cardenas;Wei-Min Wu;Mary Beth Leigh;Jack Carley

  • Impacts on microbial communities and cultivable isolates from groundwater contaminated with high levels of nitric acid–uranium waste

    Matthew Wayne Fields;Matthew Wayne Fields;Tingfen Yan;Sung-Keun Rhee;Sue L Carroll

  • Responses of microbial community functional structures to pilot-scale uranium in situ bioremediation

    Meiying Xu;Wei Min Wu;Liyou Wu;Zhili He

  • Speciation of uranium in sediments before and after in situ biostimulation.

    Shelly D Kelly;Kenneth M Kemner;Jack M Carley;Craig Criddle

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Watson
David B. Watson Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Craig S. Criddle
Craig S. Criddle Stanford University
Wei-Min Wu
Wei-Min Wu Stanford University
Jizhong Zhou
Jizhong Zhou University of Oklahoma
Baohua Gu
Baohua Gu Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Peter K. Kitanidis
Peter K. Kitanidis Stanford University
Scott Fendorf
Scott Fendorf Stanford University
Christopher W. Schadt
Christopher W. Schadt Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Terry J. Gentry
Terry J. Gentry Texas A&M University
James M. Tiedje
James M. Tiedje Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA opens various educational and professional doors, especially through flexible online programs. For those interested in advancing their expertise, exploring a doctorate degree online no dissertation can be a practical option. These programs often emphasize applied knowledge over traditional research, catering to working professionals.

Many educators looking to deepen their impact may consider an eds to edd bridge program, which offers a structured path from a master's-level education degree to a doctoral level. This pathway is ideal for those focused on leadership roles within environmental education.

For those who want to support communities and organizations through social work within environmental contexts, affordable dsw programs online provide an accessible way to gain expertise while maintaining flexibility.

Additionally, for individuals seeking broad knowledge or career shifts, pursuing a low cost online general studies degree can be an excellent foundation that supports diverse environmental career pathways without a heavy financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M. Jardine

Recently Published Articles