World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
15771
World Ranking
9375
National Ranking
697

Peter A. Floyd publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Floyd sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 74 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter A. Floyd D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Floyd sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Basalt
  • Igneous rock
  • Sedimentary rock

His primary areas of study are Geochemistry, Basalt, Magma, Metamorphism and Ophiolite. His work in the fields of Geochemistry, such as Volcanic rock and Metamorphic rock, intersects with other areas such as Type. In the field of Volcanic rock, his study on Rhyodacite, Lile and Bimodal volcanism overlaps with subjects such as Tonstein.

His Basalt study deals with Greenschist intersecting with Fractional crystallization, Partial melting, Magma chamber and Sheeted dyke complex. Many of his studies on Magma involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Continental arc. His studies deal with areas such as Andesite and Granulite as well as Metamorphism.

His most cited work include:

  • Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements (3585 citations)
  • Geochemical magma type discrimination: application to altered and metamorphosed basic igneous rocks (658 citations)
  • Magma type and tectonic setting discrimination using immobile elements (609 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Peter A. Floyd mainly investigates Geochemistry, Basalt, Petrology, Volcanic rock and Ophiolite. His Geochemistry research focuses on Oceanic crust and how it relates to Pelagic sediment. His Basalt research incorporates elements of Volcano and Pillow lava.

His Volcanic rock study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Metamorphic rock, Carboniferous and Ultramafic rock. His Magma research includes elements of Alkali basalt, Precambrian, Tectonics and Rhyodacite. His research investigates the connection between Rhyodacite and topics such as Bimodal volcanism that intersect with issues in Continental arc and Mineralogy.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Geochemistry (92.75%)
  • Basalt (36.23%)
  • Petrology (27.54%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1998-2007)?

  • Geochemistry (92.75%)
  • Petrology (27.54%)
  • Massif (11.59%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Geochemistry, Petrology, Massif, Basalt and Ophiolite. His Geochemistry research includes themes of Oceanic crust and Terrane. His studies in Petrology integrate themes in fields like Quartz monzonite, Pluton and Magmatism.

Peter A. Floyd combines subjects such as Rift and Paleozoic with his study of Massif. His study in Mafic is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Rhyodacite, Dacite, Magma, Phenocryst and Hornblende. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Metamorphic rock and Volcanic rock.

Between 1998 and 2007, his most popular works were:

  • Early Palaeozoic rift‐related magmatism in Variscan Europe: fragmentation of the Armorican Terrane Assemblage (117 citations)
  • Geochemical character and tectonic environment of Neotethyan ophiolitic fragments and metabasites in the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex, Turkey (78 citations)
  • Review of geochemical variation in Lower Palaeozoic metabasites from the NE Bohemian Massif: intracratonic rifting and plume-ridge interaction (75 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Basalt
  • Igneous rock
  • Sedimentary rock

Peter A. Floyd mostly deals with Geochemistry, Petrology, Massif, Rift and Ophiolite. His Geochemistry study incorporates themes from Seismology and Tectonics. His Petrology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Nappe, Mylonite and Décollement.

His research integrates issues of Terrane and Paleozoic in his study of Massif. The various areas that Peter A. Floyd examines in his Rift study include Magmatism, Plutonism, Mafic and Oceanic crust. Peter A. Floyd has researched Ophiolite in several fields, including Shear zone, Geomorphology, Pluton, Tectonostratigraphy and Gneiss.

Best Publications

  • Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements

    J.A. Winchester;P.A. Floyd

  • Tectonic environment of the Devonian Gramscatho basin, south Cornwall: framework mode and geochemical evidence from turbiditic sandstones

    P. A. Floyd;B. E. Leveridge

  • Geochemical magma type discrimination: application to altered and metamorphosed basic igneous rocks

    J.A. Winchester;P.A. Floyd

  • Magma type and tectonic setting discrimination using immobile elements

    P.A. Floyd;J.A. Winchester

  • Identification and discrimination of altered and metamorphosed volcanic rocks using immobile elements

    P.A. Floyd;J.A. Winchester

  • Geochemistry and tectonic setting of Lewisian clastic metasediments from the Early Proterozoic Loch Maree Group of Gairloch, NW Scotland

    P.A. Floyd;J.A. Winchester;R.G. Park

  • Geochemistry and provenance of Rhenohercynian synorogenic sandstones: implications for tectonic environment discrimination

    P. A. Floyd;R. Shail;B. E. Leveridge;W. Franke

  • Geochemistry and petrogenesis of intrusive and extrusive ophiolitic plagiogranites, Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex, Turkey

    P.A. Floyd;M.K. Yaliniz;M.C. Goncuoglu

  • Early Palaeozoic rift‐related magmatism in Variscan Europe: fragmentation of the Armorican Terrane Assemblage

    Q.G. Crowley;P.A. Floyd;J.A. Winchester;W. Franke

  • SUPRA-SUBDUCTION ZONE OPHIOLITES OF CENTRAL ANATOLIA : GEOCHEMICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE SARIKARAMAN OPHIOLITE, AKSARAY, TURKEY

    M. K. Yaliniz;P. A. Floyd;M. C. Goncuoglu

  • Geochemistry and tectonic environment of basaltic rocks from the Misis ophiolitic mélange, south Turkey

    P.A. Floyd;G. Kelling;S.L. Gökçen;N. Gökçen

  • Neogene tectonics and plate convergence in the eastern Mediterranean: New data from southern Turkey

    Gilbert Kelling;Sungu L. Gökçen;Peter A. Floyd;Nuran Gökçen

  • Geochemical character and tectonic environment of Neotethyan ophiolitic fragments and metabasites in the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex, Turkey

    Peter A. Floyd;M. Cemal Göncüoğlu;John A. Winchester;M. Kenan Yaliniz

  • Review of geochemical variation in Lower Palaeozoic metabasites from the NE Bohemian Massif: intracratonic rifting and plume-ridge interaction

    P. A. Floyd;J. A. Winchester;R. Seston;R. Kryza

  • Geochemical discrimination and petrogenesis of alkalic basalt sequences in part of the Ankara melange, central Turkey

    P. A. Floyd

  • 22. LOW-TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION OF JURASSIC OCEAN CRUST, SITE 801

    Jeffrey C. Alt;Christian France-Lanord;P. A. Floyd;Paterno Castillo

  • Geochemical features of intraplate oceanic plateau basalts

    P. A. Floyd

  • Chemical variation in Hercynian basalts relative to plate tectonics

    P. A. Floyd

  • Provenance and depositional environment of Rhenohercynian synorogenic greywackes from the Giessen Nappe, Germany

    P. A. Floyd;B. E. Leveridge;W. Franke;R. Shail

  • Geochemistry and tectonic environment of Ordovician meta-igneous rocks in the Rudawy Janowickie Complex, SW Poland

    J. A. Winchester;P. A. Floyd;M. Chocyk;K. Horbowy

Frequent Co-Authors

Paterno R. Castillo
Paterno R. Castillo Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Christian France-Lanord
Christian France-Lanord University of Lorraine
Quentin Crowley
Quentin Crowley Trinity College Dublin
Jeffrey C. Alt
Jeffrey C. Alt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
M. Cemal Göncüoglu
M. Cemal Göncüoglu Middle East Technical University
Albert Galy
Albert Galy University of Lorraine
Cahit Helvacı
Cahit Helvacı Dokuz Eylül University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider an online general studies bachelor degree cheap as a flexible and cost-effective option. This approach provides foundational knowledge while allowing specialization in environmental topics later in the career.

If balancing coursework with other commitments is a priority, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help you select a program that fits your learning style and pace while still offering valuable skills for the environmental sector.

For a more focused study, pursuing an online geology degree is an excellent pathway, providing expertise in earth sciences essential for careers in conservation, resource management, and environmental consulting.

Additionally, the integration of technology in environmental studies has made Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills crucial. Many top schools offer programs recognized as the best GIS schools, equipping students with tools needed for mapping and spatial analysis roles in various environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Floyd

Recently Published Articles