World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
12576
World Ranking
3529
National Ranking
1698

Paul S. Goodman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul S. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Paul S. Goodman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul S. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul S. Goodman was affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research focused primarily on the intersection of environmental science and engineering, with particular attention to air quality, human-automation interaction, and transportation systems.

The scientist's main fields of study included:

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science

Key subfields explored were:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Social Psychology
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Main topics addressed in the research included:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Goodman contributed to various publication venues, notably:

  • Atmospheric Pollution Research
  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
  • Scientific Reports
  • Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment

Collaborations were an important aspect of Goodman's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Anil Namdeo
  • Margaret Bell
  • PT Blythe
  • Yanghanzi Zhang
  • Simon Edwards

The following recent papers exemplify the range of topics investigated:

  • Analysis of various transport modes to evaluate personal exposure to PM2.5 pollution in Delhi, 2020, Atmospheric Pollution Research
  • Should older people be considered a homogeneous group when interacting with level 3 automated vehicles?, 2021, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Unprecedented reduction in air pollution and corresponding short-term premature mortality associated with COVID-19 lockdown in Delhi, India, 2021, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
  • Analysing the effect of gender on the human-machine interaction in level 3 automated vehicles, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Characteristics of real-world gaseous exhaust emissions from cars in heterogeneous traffic conditions, 2021, Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment

Best Publications

  • Time: A New Research Lens

    Deborah G. Ancona;Paul S. Goodman;Barbara S. Lawrence;Michael L. Tushman

  • Groups That Work (and Those That Don't)

    Paul S. Goodman

  • Understanding groups in organizations.

    Paul S. Goodman;Elizabeth C. Ravlin;Marshall Schminke

  • New perspectives on organizational effectiveness

    Allen C. Bluedorn;Paul S. Goodman.;Johannes M. Pennings

  • Designing effective work groups

    Paul S. Goodman

  • Computer-aided systems and communities: mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments

    Paul S. Goodman;Eric D. Darr

  • An examination of referents used in the evaluation of pay

    Paul S. Goodman

  • Groups and Productivity; Analyzing the Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams

    Paul S. Goodman;Rukmini Devadas;Terri L. Griffith Hughson

  • Leading groups in organizations

    J. R Hackman;R. E. Walton;P. S. Goodman

  • Familiarity and Group Productivity

    Paul S. Goodman;Dennis Patrick Leyden

  • Creating effective University-industry alliances: An organizational learning perspective

    Richard M. Cyert;Paul S. Goodman

  • Customer-Firm Relationships, Involvement, and Customer Satisfaction

    Paul S. Goodman;Mark Fichman;F. Javier Lerch;Pamela R. Snyder

  • Technology and Organizations

    Paul S. Goodman;Lee Sproull

  • Current Thinking About Groups: Setting the Stage for New Ideas

    Paul S. Goodman;Elizabeth C. Ravlin;Linda Argote

  • Change in organizations

    Paul S Goodman;Lance B Kurke;Chris Argyris;Barry M Staw

  • An Examination of Adams' Theory of Inequity

    Paul S. Goodman;Abraham Friedman

  • Organizational errors: Directions for future research

    Paul S. Goodman;Rangaraj Ramanujam;John S. Carroll;Amy C. Edmondson

  • Productivity in Organizations

    Paul S. Goodman;Douglas H. Harris

  • Latent errors and adverse organizational consequences: a conceptualization

    Rangaraj Ramanujam;Paul S. Goodman

  • Contribution behaviors in distributed environments

    Fernando Olivera;Paul S. Goodman;Sharon Swee-Lin Tan

  • Technology and Organizations.

    Ralph C. Hybels;Paul S. Goodman;Lee S. Sproull

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Argote
Linda Argote Carnegie Mellon University
Johannes M. Pennings
Johannes M. Pennings University of Pennsylvania
Denise M. Rousseau
Denise M. Rousseau Carnegie Mellon University
Michael L. Tushman
Michael L. Tushman Harvard University
David A. Schkade
David A. Schkade University of California, San Diego
Lee Sproull
Lee Sproull New York University
Herbert Marcuse
Herbert Marcuse University of California, San Diego
David A. Hofmann
David A. Hofmann University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Laurie R. Weingart
Laurie R. Weingart Carnegie Mellon University
Marshall Schminke
Marshall Schminke University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA often leads to rewarding careers in social work, psychology, and behavioral analysis. Online education has opened new doors, making higher learning more accessible and affordable for students worldwide.

One major concern is tuition cost. For prospective social workers, there are cheap msw programs online that deliver quality education at lower prices. Pursuing positions in behavior analysis? It’s important to research bcba certification online cost to plan and budget effectively.

Another key issue is how quickly you can earn your degree. Many opt for accelerated social work degree pathways, which allow fast-tracking into the workforce. Similarly, students interested in psychology careers may choose accelerated psychology programs online to complete their studies efficiently.

Selecting the right online program involves balancing cost, speed, and accreditation. Carefully explore your options to find a pathway that meets your academic and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Paul S. Goodman

Recently Published Articles