World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
6796
World Ranking
7128
National Ranking
167

Patrick Schleppi publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Schleppi sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Patrick Schleppi D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Schleppi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Schleppi is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with notable subfields including soil science, environmental chemistry, and ecology.

Their main research topics encompass soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, soil and water nutrient dynamics, peatlands and wetlands ecology, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, tree-ring climate responses, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and mycorrhizal fungi and plant interactions.

Patrick Schleppi has contributed to various scientific papers published in respected journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • Lessons learned from a long-term irrigation experiment in a dry Scots pine forest: Impacts on traits and functioning (2022, Ecological Monographs)
  • Only Minor Changes in the Soil Microbiome of a Sub-alpine Forest After 20 Years of Moderately Increased Nitrogen Loads (2020, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change)
  • Atmospheric deposition and precipitation are important predictors of inorganic nitrogen export to streams from forest and grassland watersheds: a large-scale data synthesis (2022, Biogeochemistry)
  • Leaf Morphological Traits and Leaf Nutrient Concentrations of European Beech Across a Water Availability Gradient in Switzerland (2020, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change)
  • Variation in Leaf Morphological Traits of European Beech and Norway Spruce Over Two Decades in Switzerland (2022, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change)

Frequent publication venues for Schleppi include:

  • Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Biogeochemistry
  • Biogeosciences
  • Ecological Monographs
  • Frontiers in Environmental Science

Collaborations have been established with several coauthors, notably Ivano Brunner (3 publications), Frank Hagedorn (2 publications), Sophia Etzold (2 publications), Katrin Meusburger (2 publications), and Marcus Schaub (2 publications).

Best Publications

  • Nitrogen deposition makes a minor contribution to carbon sequestration in temperate forests

    Knute J. Nadelhoffer;Bridget A. Emmett;Per Gundersen;O. Janne Kjønaas

  • Export of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen from Gleysol dominated catchments – the significance of water flow paths

    Frank Hagedorn;Patrick Schleppi;Peter Waldner;Hannes Flühler

  • Sinks for nitrogen inputs in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta‐analysis of 15N tracer field studies

    P. H. Templer;M. C. Mack;F. S. Chapin;L. M. Christenson

  • Predicting the Effects of Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition in Conifer Stands: Evidence from the NITREX Ecosystem-Scale Experiments

    B. A. Emmett;D. Boxman;M. Bredemeier;P. Gundersen

  • Rare earth elements in soil and in soil-grown plants

    A. Wyttenbach;V. Furrer;P. Schleppi;L. Tobler

  • Correcting non-linearity and slope effects in the estimation of the leaf area index of forests from hemispherical photographs

    Patrick Schleppi;Marco Conedera;Isabella Sedivy;Anne Thimonier

  • Estimating leaf area index in different types of mature forest stands in Switzerland: a comparison of methods

    Anne Thimonier;Isabella Sedivy;Patrick Schleppi

  • Regional assessment of N saturation using foliar and root δ15N

    L. H. Pardo;P. H. Templer;C. L. Goodale;S. Duke

  • Central European hardwood trees in a high‐CO2 future: synthesis of an 8‐year forest canopy CO2 enrichment project

    Martin K.-F. Bader;Martin K.-F. Bader;Sebastian Leuzinger;Sebastian Leuzinger;Sonja Gisela Yin Keel;Sonja Gisela Yin Keel;Rolf T.W. Siegwolf

  • Effect of irrigation on needle morphology, shoot and stem growth in a drought-exposed Pinus sylvestris forest.

    Matthias Dobbertin;Britta Eilmann;Peter Bleuler;Arnaud Giuggiola

  • Soil warming opens the nitrogen cycle at the alpine treeline.

    Melissa A. Dawes;Patrick Schleppi;Stephan Hättenschwiler;Christian Rixen

  • Input-output budgets at the NITREX sites.

    M Bredemeier;K Blanck;YJ Xu;A Tietema

  • Effects of Redox Conditions and Flow Processes on the Mobility of Dissolved Organic Carbon and Nitrogen in a Forest Soil

    Frank Hagedorn;Klaus Kaiser;H. Feyen;Patrick Schleppi

  • Canopy closure, LAI and radiation transfer from airborne LiDAR synthetic images

    David Moeser;Jiri Roubinek;Patrick Schleppi;Felix Morsdorf

  • Nitrogen saturation experiments (NITREX) in coniferous forest ecosystems in Europe: a summary of results

    A. Tietema;A.W. Boxman;M. Bredemeier;B.A. Emmett

  • Nitrogen budgets of two small experimental forested catchments at Alptal, Switzerland

    Patrick Schleppi;Nathalie Muller;Hans Feyen;Andreas Papritz

  • The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe

    P. Gundersen;J. R. Christiansen;J. R. Christiansen;G. Alberti;N. Brüggemann;N. Brüggemann

  • Runoff-driven export of particulate organic carbon from soil in temperate forested uplands

    Joanne C. Smith;Albert Galy;Niels Hovius;Andrew M. Tye

  • Contrasting dynamics of dissolved inorganic and organic nitrogen in soil and surface waters of forested catchments with Gleysols

    Frank Hagedorn;Jürg B Bucher;Patrick Schleppi

  • Simulation of Increased Nitrogen Deposition to a Montane Forest Ecosystem: Partitioning of the Added 15N

    P. Schleppi;I. Bucher-Wallin;R. Siegwolf;M. Saurer

  • Regional Assessment of N Saturation using Foliar and Root <img src="/fulltext-image.asp?format=htmln

    Linda H. Pardo;Pamela H. Templer;Christine L. Goodale;Sara E. Duke;Sara E. Duke

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Gundersen
Per Gundersen University of Copenhagen
Frank Hagedorn
Frank Hagedorn Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Filip Moldan
Filip Moldan Czech Academy of Sciences
Bridget A. Emmett
Bridget A. Emmett Natural Environment Research Council
Albert Tietema
Albert Tietema University of Amsterdam
Rolf T. W. Siegwolf
Rolf T. W. Siegwolf Paul Scherrer Institute
Knute J. Nadelhoffer
Knute J. Nadelhoffer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard F. Wright
Richard F. Wright Norwegian Institute for Water Research
Harald Bugmann
Harald Bugmann ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of related online degrees that can enhance your expertise and career prospects. For those interested in spatial data and mapping technologies, exploring the best gis programs is a smart choice. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly essential for environmental analysis and resource management roles.

Leadership and policy development are critical in addressing environmental challenges. Pursuing a degree through one of the top online mpa programs offers advanced knowledge in public administration, preparing graduates to implement sustainable policies within government or nonprofit sectors.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is equally important. Degrees like the best online bachelor degree in sociology can provide valuable insights into human behavior and social systems, complementing environmental science studies and broadening career versatility.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise without lengthy research commitments, there are flexible options such as online doctoral programs without dissertation. These programs allow for focused study, making them ideal for environmental educators or administrators seeking the highest credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Schleppi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles