World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7462 7169 7 7 217 6158

Nikolai V. Erkaev publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nikolai V. Erkaev between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nikolai V. Erkaev published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2002. 9 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2002. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
1986 2025

250 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nikolai V. Erkaev: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 1
1994 3
1995 3
1996 1
1997 3
1998 8
1999 3
2000 10
2001 10
2002 15
2003 5
2004 8
2005 10
2006 6
2007 9
2008 7
2009 9
2010 8
2011 5
2012 8
2013 10
2014 12
2015 10
2016 6
2017 12
2018 14
2019 9
2020 11
2021 2
2022 9
2023 7
2024 4
2025 5
Total 250
Download as CSV

Nikolai V. Erkaev publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikolai V. Erkaev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 217 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282 217
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Nikolai V. Erkaev D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikolai V. Erkaev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Nikolai V. Erkaev is a researcher affiliated with the Siberian Federal University in the Russian Federation. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Physics and Astronomy, with an emphasis on Astronomy and Astrophysics. Their scholarly work encompasses topics related to astro and planetary science, solar and space plasma dynamics, as well as stellar, planetary, and galactic studies.

The scientist has contributed extensively to fields including ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, planetary science and exploration, geomagnetism and paleomagnetism studies, and astrophysics and star formation studies. This multidisciplinary approach reflects the complexity and interconnectedness of space, planetary atmospheres, and related physical processes.

Notable recent publications authored or co-authored by Nikolai V. Erkaev include:

  • "Overcoming the Limitations of the Energy-limited Approximation for Planet Atmospheric Escape," 2020, SibFU Digital Repository (Siberian Federal University)
  • "Escape of rock-forming volatile elements and noble gases from planetary embryos," 2020, Icarus
  • "Escape and evolution of Titan's N2 atmosphere constrained by 14N/15N isotope ratios," 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • "The Exosphere as a Boundary: Origin and Evolution of Airless Bodies in the Inner Solar System and Beyond Including Planets with Silicate Atmospheres," 2022, Space Science Reviews
  • "Precise photoionisation treatment and hydrodynamic effects in atmospheric modelling of warm and hot Neptunes," 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics

Frequently collaborating with other experts, this scientist has worked with colleagues such as V. S. Semenov, H. Lämmer, P. Odert, N. A. Tsyganenko, and Daria Kubyshkina. These collaborations have contributed to a broad range of studies across numerous reputable publication venues.

Common venues for their research dissemination include:

  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Nikolai V. Erkaev's work largely addresses key issues in planetary atmospheres and their escape mechanisms, space plasma environments, and evolutionary processes of celestial bodies. Their research contributes to understanding the physics governing both atmospheric escape in planetary bodies and the dynamics of space plasmas affecting the solar system.

Best Publications

  • Coronal mass ejection (CME) activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. II. CME-induced ion pick up of Earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable zones.

    Helmut Lammer;Herbert I.M. Lichtenegger;Yuri N. Kulikov;Jean Mathias Grießmeier

  • Roche lobe effects on the atmospheric loss from "Hot Jupiters"

    N. V. Erkaev;Yu. N. Kulikov;H. Lammer;F. Selsis

  • Determining the mass loss limit for close-in exoplanets: what can we learn from transit observations?

    H. Lammer;P. Odert;M. Leitzinger;M. L. Khodachenko

  • Origin and loss of nebula-captured hydrogen envelopes from ‘sub’- to ‘super-Earths’ in the habitable zone of Sun-like stars

    H. Lammer;A. Stökl;N. V. Erkaev;N. V. Erkaev;E. A. Dorfi

  • The Evolution of Stellar Rotation and the Hydrogen Atmospheres of Habitable-zone Terrestrial Planets

    C. P. Johnstone;M. Güdel;A. Stökl;H. Lammer

  • Evolution of dipolarization in the near-Earth current sheet induced by Earthward rapid flux transport

    R. Nakamura;A. Retino;W. Baumjohann;M. Volwerk

  • Aeronomical constraints to the minimum mass and maximum radius of hot low-mass planets

    L. Fossati;N. V. Erkaev;H. Lammer;P. E. Cubillos

  • Grid of upper atmosphere models for 1–40 M⊕ planets: application to CoRoT-7 b and HD 219134 b,c

    D. Kubyshkina;L. Fossati;N. V. Erkaev;N. V. Erkaev;C. P. Johnstone

  • Overcoming the Limitations of the Energy-limited Approximation for Planet Atmospheric Escape

    D. Kubyshkina;L. Fossati;N. V. Erkaev;N. V. Erkaev;P. E. Cubillos

  • Loss of hydrogen and oxygen from the upper atmosphere of Venus

    H. Lammer;H.I.M. Lichtenegger;H.K. Biernat;H.K. Biernat;N.V. Erkaev

  • Probing the blow-off criteria of hydrogen-rich 'super-Earths'

    H. Lammer;N. V. Erkaev;N. V. Erkaev;P. Odert;P. Odert;K. G. Kislyakova;K. G. Kislyakova

  • XUV-exposed, non-hydrostatic hydrogen-rich upper atmospheres of terrestrial planets. Part I: atmospheric expansion and thermal escape.

    Nikolai V. Erkaev;Helmut Lammer;Petra Odert;Yuri N. Kulikov

  • EUV-driven mass-loss of protoplanetary cores with hydrogen-dominated atmospheres: the influences of ionization and orbital distance

    N. V. Erkaev;H. Lammer;P. Odert;K. G. Kislyakova

  • Atmosphere expansion and mass loss of close-orbit giant exoplanets heated by stellar XUV: I. Modeling of hydrodynamic escape of upper atmospheric material

    I. F. Shaikhislamov;M. L. Khodachenko;Yu. L. Sasunov;H. Lammer

  • Mass loss from “Hot Jupiters”—Implications for CoRoT discoveries, Part II: Long time thermal atmospheric evaporation modeling

    T. Penz;N. V. Erkaev;Yu. N. Kulikov;D. Langmayr

  • Identifying the ‘true’ radius of the hot sub-Neptune CoRoT-24b by mass-loss modelling

    H. Lammer;N. V. Erkaev;L. Fossati;I. Juvan

  • Stellar wind interaction and pick-up ion escape of the Kepler-11 “super-Earths”

    K. G. Kislyakova;C. P. Johnstone;P. Odert;P. Odert;N. V. Erkaev;N. V. Erkaev

  • Charts of joint Kelvin‐Helmholtz and Rayleigh‐Taylor instabilites at the dayside magnetopause for strongly northward interplanetary magnetic field

    Charlie J. Farrugia;F. T. Gratton;L. Bender;Helfried K. Biernat

  • Anomalous magnetosheath properties during Earth passage of an interplanetary magnetic cloud

    Charlie J. Farrugia;Nikolai V. Erkaev;Helfried K. Biernat;L. F. Burlaga

  • Ion loss on Mars caused by the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability

    T. Penz;T. Penz;N.V. Erkaev;H.K. Biernat;H.K. Biernat;H. Lammer

  • Escape of the martian protoatmosphere and initial water inventory

    N. V. Erkaev;N. V. Erkaev;H. Lammer;L. Elkins-Tanton;A. Stökl

Frequent Co-Authors

Helmut Lammer
Helmut Lammer Austrian Academy of Sciences
Charles J. Farrugia
Charles J. Farrugia University of New Hampshire
Manuel Güdel
Manuel Güdel University of Vienna
Mats Holmström
Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics
Roy Torbert
Roy Torbert University of New Hampshire
Nicola Tosi
Nicola Tosi German Aerospace Center
Ronald P. Lepping
Ronald P. Lepping Goddard Space Flight Center
Wolfgang Baumjohann
Wolfgang Baumjohann Austrian Academy of Sciences
Linda T. Elkins-Tanton
Linda T. Elkins-Tanton Arizona State University
Esa Kallio
Esa Kallio Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. For example, pursuing a dsw online programs offers pathways into environmental policy and community advocacy roles. These programs emphasize the social aspects of environmental issues, blending science with social work approaches.

Those seeking a flexible route might consider an online general studies bachelor degree cheap, which allows customization and interdisciplinary studies. This degree can cover essential environmental topics while incorporating broader knowledge areas suitable for diverse career paths.

If you’re looking for less intensive options to kickstart your education, exploring what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify manageable programs. While “easy” is subjective, degrees aligned with environmental sciences can sometimes be balanced with your personal strengths and schedule.

Moreover, specialized options like online geology degrees are directly connected to Environmental Sciences. These programs provide deeper insight into earth processes, natural resources, and environmental conservation, preparing graduates for roles in research, consulting, and environmental management.

Best Scientists Citing Nikolai V. Erkaev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles