World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
44359
World Ranking
18598
National Ranking
620

Nicholas Bellamy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Bellamy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 324 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nicholas Bellamy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Bellamy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas Bellamy is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. The academic profile does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues related to their work.

Their research focus and academic contributions are not detailed with specific fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work in the available data.

There are no listed book publications or awards associated with this scientist in the provided information.

Given the limited data on their research output and career milestones, further detailed insights into Nicholas Bellamy's academic activities or areas of expertise cannot be provided.

Best Publications

  • Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

    Nicholas Bellamy;W. Watson Buchanan;Charles H. Goldsmith;Jane Campbell

  • Topical Review and RecommendationsCore outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

    Robert H. Dworkin;Dennis C. Turk;John T. Farrar;Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite

  • Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

    Dennis C Turk;Robert H Dworkin;Robert R Allen;Nicholas Bellamy

  • Viscosupplementation for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee

    Nicholas Bellamy;Jane Campbell;V Robinson;Travis L Gee

  • Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement

    F Tubach;P Ravaud;G Baron;B Falissard

  • OMERACT-OARSI Initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited.

    T. Pham;D. van der Heijde;R. D. Altman;J. J. Anderson

  • Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee

    Nicholas Bellamy;Jane Campbell;Vivian Robinson;Travis L. Gee

  • Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis : Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritic Research Society

    Roy Altman;Kenneth Brandt;Marc Hochberg;Roland Moskowitz

  • Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state

    F Tubach;P Ravaud;G Baron;B Falissard

  • Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis.

    Elliot W. Ehrich;Glenn M. Davies;Douglas J. Watson;James A. Bolognese

  • The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium

    J. Agel;K. Akesson;P. C. Amadio;M. Anderson

  • A randomized, controlled trial of methotrexate versus placebo in early diffuse scleroderma

    Janet E. Pope;Nicholas Bellamy;James R. Seibold;Murray Baron

  • Comparison of amitriptyline, cyclobenzaprine, and placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia

    Simon Carette;Simon Carette;Mary J. Bell;W. John Reynolds;W. John Reynolds;Boulos Haraoui;Boulos Haraoui

  • Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: Experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index

    Nicholas Bellamy

  • Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

    Robert H. Dworkin;Dennis C. Turk;Sarah Peirce-Sandner;Ralf Baron

  • Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: Results from a prospective multinational study

    F. Tubach;P. Ravaud;E. Martin-Mola;H. Awada

  • Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Jean-Yves Reginster;Janusz Badurski;Nicholas Bellamy;William Bensen

  • WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire.

    Nicholas Bellamy

  • Dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in hand osteoarthritis: Development of the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index.

    N. Bellamy;J. Campbell;B. Haraoui;R. Buchbinder

  • Outcome variables for osteoarthritis clinical trials: The OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria.

    Thao Pham;Désirée Van Der Heijde;Marissa Lassere;Roy D Altman

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles H. Goldsmith
Charles H. Goldsmith Simon Fraser University
Maxime Dougados
Maxime Dougados Hôpital Cochin
George A. Wells
George A. Wells University of Ottawa
Peter Brooks
Peter Brooks University of Melbourne
Roland Chapurlat
Roland Chapurlat Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa
Claire Bombardier
Claire Bombardier University of Toronto
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
David T. Felson
David T. Felson Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their opportunities after studying Medicine in the USA, a variety of related online degrees and career pathways are available. These programs can help you specialize or transition into high-demand healthcare roles, often with the flexibility of online study.

Those looking into healthcare leadership may consider the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration. This path prepares you for administrative and managerial positions in hospitals and care organizations.

If you aim for advanced clinical practice, explore cheapest dnp online programs. A Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree can boost your expertise in patient care and clinical leadership.

For those drawn to pharmacy, earning an online pharmd opens doors to clinical, research, and community pharmacy careers. Pharmacists play a critical role in healthcare delivery and medication safety.

Finally, tech-savvy students can specialize with a health information management bachelor degree online. This field is vital for managing patient data and ensuring healthcare data security.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Bellamy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles