World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
20782
World Ranking
1921
National Ranking
201

Neville N. Osborne publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neville N. Osborne sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 405 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Neville N. Osborne D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neville N. Osborne sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neville N. Osborne is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and specializes in the field of Physics and Astronomy. Their research interests span multiple subfields including Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, as well as Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Osborne's work covers a range of scientific topics related to magnetic confinement fusion research, fusion materials and technologies, superconducting materials and applications, atomic and subatomic physics research, and ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics.

The following represent key topics associated with Osborne's research:

  • Magnetic confinement fusion research
  • Fusion materials and technologies
  • Superconducting Materials and Applications
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

The scientist has contributed to several recent papers, including the following publications:

  • Spectroscopic investigations of detachment on the MAST Upgrade Super-X divertor, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Investigating the impact of the molecular charge-exchange rate on detached SOLPS-ITER simulations, 2023, Nuclear Fusion
  • Menopause and multiple sclerosis: the overlooked conversation in women's health, 2025, British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing

Osborne has collaborated extensively with a group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • K. Verhaegh
  • B. Lipschultz
  • J. Harrison
  • Alan Williams
  • A. Fil

The scientist's publications appear in a range of venues, among the most frequent are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nuclear Fusion
  • British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing

There are no recorded book publications or awards associated with Neville N. Osborne in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Müller Cells in the Healthy and Diseased Retina

    Andreas Bringmann;Thomas Pannicke;Jens Grosche;Mike Francke

  • Retinal ischemia: mechanisms of damage and potential therapeutic strategies.

    Neville N Osborne;Robert J Casson;John P.M Wood;Glyn Chidlow

  • Cellular signaling and factors involved in Müller cell gliosis: neuroprotective and detrimental effects.

    Andreas Bringmann;Ianors Iandiev;Thomas Pannicke;Antje Wurm

  • Neuroprotection in Relation to Retinal Ischemia and Relevance to Glaucoma

    N.N Osborne;M Ugarte;M Chao;G Chidlow

  • Mitochondria: Their role in ganglion cell death and survival in primary open angle glaucoma

    Neville N. Osborne

  • A hypothesis to explain ganglion cell death caused by vascular insults at the optic nerve head: possible implication for the treatment of glaucoma.☆

    N.N Osborne;J Melena;G Chidlow;J.P.M Wood

  • Ganglion cell death in glaucoma: what do we really know?

    Neville N Osborne;John P M Wood;Glyn Chidlow;Ji-Hong Bae

  • Zinc in the retina.

    Marta Ugarte;Neville N Osborne

  • The role of glia, mitochondria, and the immune system in glaucoma.

    Gülgün Tezel;Tamir Ben-Hur;Gary E. Gibson;Beth Stevens

  • Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy, Vol. 2: Classical Transmitters in the CNS: Part 1. Edited by A. Björklund and T. Hökfelt. ISBN 0444 90330 5. Price: $104. Elsevier, 1984

    Neville N. Osborne

  • Recent clinical findings with memantine should not mean that the idea of neuroprotection in glaucoma is abandoned.

    Neville N. Osborne

  • Pathogenesis of ganglion "cell death" in glaucoma and neuroprotection: focus on ganglion cell axonal mitochondria.

    Neville N Osborne

  • Isoquercitrin is the most effective antioxidant in the plant Thuja orientalis and able to counteract oxidative-induced damage to a transformed cell line (RGC-5 cells).

    Sang Hoon Jung;Sang Hoon Jung;Beum Jin Kim;Eun Ha Lee;Neville N. Osborne

  • Iron, zinc, and copper in retinal physiology and disease

    Marta Ugarte;Neville N. Osborne;Laurence A. Brown;Paul N. Bishop

  • In vivo and in vitro experiments show that betaxolol is a retinal neuroprotective agent.

    N.N Osborne;C Cazevieille;A.L Carvalho;A.K Larsen

  • Topically applied betaxolol attenuates NMDA-induced toxicity to ganglion cells and the effects of ischaemia to the retina.

    N.N. Osborne;L. DeSANTIS;J.H. Bae;M. Ugarte

  • A hypothesis to suggest that light is a risk factor in glaucoma and the mitochondrial optic neuropathies

    Neville N Osborne;Gerassimos Lascaratos;A J Bron;Glyn Chidlow

  • Optic nerve and neuroprotection strategies.

    N N Osborne;G Chidlow;C J Layton;J P M Wood

  • GABA neurones in retinas of different species and their postnatal development in situ and in culture in the rabbit retina.

    N. N. Osborne;S. Patel;D. W. Beaton;V. Neuhoff

  • Oxidative-induced apoptosis to an immortalized ganglion cell line is caspase independent but involves the activation of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and apoptosis-inducing factor.

    Guang-Yu Li;Neville N. Osborne

  • Biology of serotonergic transmission

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Reichenbach
Andreas Reichenbach Leipzig University
Mark Graham
Mark Graham King's College London
Thomas Pannicke
Thomas Pannicke Leipzig University
Andreas Bringmann
Andreas Bringmann Leipzig University
Peter Wiedemann
Peter Wiedemann Leipzig University
Manuel Vidal-Sanz
Manuel Vidal-Sanz University of Murcia
Graham J. Dockray
Graham J. Dockray University of Liverpool
Nigel P. Groome
Nigel P. Groome Oxford Brookes University
Paul N. Bishop
Paul N. Bishop University of Manchester
Valerio Carelli
Valerio Carelli University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Neville N. Osborne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles