World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
6541
World Ranking
7518
National Ranking
2527

Ned Fetcher publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ned Fetcher sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 85 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ned Fetcher D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ned Fetcher sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ned Fetcher is a researcher affiliated with Wilkes University in the United States whose work primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research contributions focus extensively on Atmospheric Science and Ecology, with additional interests in Global and Planetary Change, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, and Pollution.

The scientist's work addresses key topics within climate and environmental sciences, particularly:

  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Polar Research and Ecology
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Particle Detector Development and Performance

Fetcher has published in various scientific venues, most frequently in Arctic Science, followed by contributions to Nature, Journal of Plant Ecology, Environmental Research Letters, and New Phytologist. Their recent significant publications include:

  • "A review of open top chamber (OTC) performance across the ITEX Network" (2022, Arctic Science)
  • "Environmental drivers of increased ecosystem respiration in a warming tundra" (2024, Nature)
  • "Leaf and root phenology and biomass of Eriophorum vaginatum in response to warming in the Arctic" (2022, Journal of Plant Ecology)
  • "Range shifts in a foundation sedge potentially induce large Arctic ecosystem carbon losses and gains" (2022, Environmental Research Letters)
  • "Intraspecific variation in phenology offers resilience to climate change for Eriophorum vaginatum" (2021, Arctic Science)

The scientist's collaborations are notable with frequent coauthors including Jianwu Tang, Thomas C. Parker, Michael L. Moody, Steven Unger, and Robert G. Björk. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications, reflecting ongoing interdisciplinary research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Light Environments of Tropical Forests

    R. L. Chazdon;N. Fetcher

  • Photosynthetic light environments in a lowland tropical rain forest in Costa Rica.

    Robin L. Chazdon;Ned Fetcher

  • Photosynthetic Responses of Tropical Forest Plants to Contrasting Light Environments

    Robin L. Chazdon;Robert W. Pearcy;David W. Lee;Ned Fetcher

  • Productivity and Nutrient Cycling of Alaskan Tundra: Enhancement by Flowing Soil Water

    F. Stuart Chapin;Ned Fetcher;Knut Kielland;Kaye R. Everett

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: an expert assessment

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

  • Effects of light regime on the growth, leaf morphology, and water relations of seedlings of two species of tropical trees

    Ned Fetcher;Boyd R. Strain;Steven F. Oberbauer

  • ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND PLANT SUCCESSION ON LANDSLIDES IN THE CARIBBEAN

    Lawrence R. Walker;Daniel J. Zarin;Ned Fetcher;Randall W. Myster

  • Vegetation effects on microclimate in lowland tropical forest in Costa Rica

    N. Fetcher;S. F. Oberbauer;B. R. Strain

  • Nitrogen immobilization by decomposing woody debris and the recovery of tropical wet forest from hurricane disturbance

    Jess K. Zimmerman;William M. Pulliam;D. Jean Lodge;Vanessa Quinones-Orfila

  • Effect of CO2‐enrichnient on seedling physiology and growth of two tropical tree species

    Steven F. Oberbauer;Boyd R. Strain;Ned Fetcher

  • Changes in Light Availability Following Hurricane Hugo in a Subtropical Montane Forest in Puerto Rico

    Denny S. Fernandez;Ned Fetcher

  • LIFE HISTORIES OF TILLERS OF ERIOPHORUM VAGINATUM IN RELATION TO TUNDRA DISTURBANCE

    Ned Fetcher;G. R. Shaver

  • Natural disturbance and human land use as determinants of tropical forest dynamics: results from a forest simulator

    Maria Uriarte;Charles D. Canham;Jill Thompson;Jess K. Zimmerman

  • RESPONSES OF TROPICAL PLANTS TO NUTRIENTS AND LIGHT ON A LANDSLIDE IN PUERTO RICO

    N. Fetcher;B. L. Haines;R. A. Cordero;D. J. Lodge

  • Modeling the spatial and temporal variability in climate and primary productivity across the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico

    Hongqing Wang;Charles A.S. Hall;Frederick N. Scatena;Ned Fetcher

  • Home site advantage in two long-lived arctic plant species: results from two 30-year reciprocal transplant studies

    Cynthia C. Bennington;Ned Fetcher;Milan C. Vavrek;Gaius R. Shaver

  • The relationship between treefall gap size and light flux in a Neotropical rain forest in Costa Rica

    Andrew M. Barton;Ned Fetcher;Steven Redhead

  • Immediate Impact of Hurricance Hugo on a Puerto Rican Rain Forest

    Lawrence R. Walker;Janice Voltzow;James D. Ackerman;Denny S. Fernandez

  • Growth and flowering in Eriophorum vaginatum: annual and latitudinal variation

    Gaius R. Shaver;Ned Fetcher;F. Stuart Chapin

  • Growth and tillering patterns within tussocks of Eriophorum vaginatum

    Ned Fetcher;Gaius R. Shaver

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

Frequent Co-Authors

Jianwu Tang
Jianwu Tang East China Normal University
Gaius R. Shaver
Gaius R. Shaver Marine Biological Laboratory
James B. McGraw
James B. McGraw West Virginia University
Adrian V. Rocha
Adrian V. Rocha University of Notre Dame
Lawrence R. Walker
Lawrence R. Walker University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Steven F. Oberbauer
Steven F. Oberbauer Florida International University
F. Stuart Chapin
F. Stuart Chapin University of Alaska Fairbanks
Jess K. Zimmerman
Jess K. Zimmerman University of Puerto Rico
Boyd R. Strain
Boyd R. Strain Duke University
Robin L. Chazdon
Robin L. Chazdon University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your career options beyond Ecology and Evolution? Many students explore healthcare and nursing fields due to growing demand and flexible online programs. For registered nurses looking to upskill quickly, the rn to bsn in 6 months pathway allows professionals to earn a bachelor’s degree in an accelerated, flexible timeframe.

Those with an associate nursing degree can consider the asn to np bridge, a route designed to help nurses become nurse practitioners with less disruption to their careers. Even students without prior nursing experience can transition into healthcare by enrolling in direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online, which fast-track graduates into advanced nursing roles.

Choosing the right university is key. For those comparing options, see insights from capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn to weigh program features, flexibility, and outcomes.

Whether you pursue environmental science or healthcare, online degrees open doors to diverse, impactful career pathways that complement studies in Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Ned Fetcher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles